• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从咨询者到合作者——推动科学领域伦理参与的标准操作规程

From consultors to collaborators - An SOP for advancing ethics engagement in science.

作者信息

Paleri Varsha Aravind, Hens Kristien

机构信息

Centre for Ethics, Department of Philosophy, Universiteit Antwerpen, Stadscampus, 2000, Antwerpen, Belgium.

出版信息

Synth Syst Biotechnol. 2025 Jun 23;10(4):1180-1189. doi: 10.1016/j.synbio.2025.06.006. eCollection 2025 Dec.

DOI:10.1016/j.synbio.2025.06.006
PMID:40689230
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12271606/
Abstract

Synthetic Biology (SynBio) is an interdisciplinary field that tackles global challenges in healthcare, sustainability, food production, among others. However, it also presents critical ethical concerns, including biosecurity, justice, and the unintended consequences of research biases. Addressing these concerns requires timely and systematic ethical evaluation. Conventional approaches often relegate ethics to an external, procedural role rather than embedding it within the core of scientific inquiry, leading to delayed engagement and associated challenges. This article introduces a structured, stage-wise Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) to support the systematic integration of ethics into scientific research. Particularly beneficial for early-career researchers and ethicists, this framework offers a practical method for incorporating ethical reflection throughout the research process.

摘要

合成生物学(SynBio)是一个跨学科领域,致力于应对医疗保健、可持续发展、粮食生产等方面的全球挑战。然而,它也引发了关键的伦理问题,包括生物安全、公正以及研究偏差的意外后果。解决这些问题需要及时且系统的伦理评估。传统方法往往将伦理置于外部的程序角色,而非将其融入科学探究的核心,导致参与延迟及相关挑战。本文介绍一种结构化、分阶段的标准操作规程(SOP),以支持将伦理系统地融入科学研究。该框架对早期职业研究人员和伦理学家特别有益,提供了一种在整个研究过程中纳入伦理思考的实用方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c37f/12271606/201ab441790b/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c37f/12271606/56a32850c1d8/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c37f/12271606/201ab441790b/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c37f/12271606/56a32850c1d8/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c37f/12271606/201ab441790b/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
From consultors to collaborators - An SOP for advancing ethics engagement in science.从咨询者到合作者——推动科学领域伦理参与的标准操作规程
Synth Syst Biotechnol. 2025 Jun 23;10(4):1180-1189. doi: 10.1016/j.synbio.2025.06.006. eCollection 2025 Dec.
2
Stench of Errors or the Shine of Potential: The Challenge of (Ir)Responsible Use of ChatGPT in Speech-Language Pathology.错误的恶臭还是潜力的光辉:言语病理学中(不)负责任地使用ChatGPT的挑战。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025 Jul-Aug;60(4):e70088. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.70088.
3
Short-Term Memory Impairment短期记忆障碍
4
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
5
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
6
Responsible research impact: Ethics for making a difference.负责任的研究影响:创造改变的伦理准则。
Open Res Eur. 2025 Mar 31;5:92. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.19649.1. eCollection 2025.
7
Navigating Neurotypical Norms in Academic Research: A Perspective from an Autistic Early Career Researcher.在学术研究中探寻神经典型规范:一位自闭症早期职业研究者的视角
Autism Adulthood. 2025 Apr 3;7(2):133-140. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0182. eCollection 2025 Apr.
8
Trust, Trustworthiness, and the Future of Medical AI: Outcomes of an Interdisciplinary Expert Workshop.信任、可信度与医学人工智能的未来:跨学科专家研讨会成果
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 2;27:e71236. doi: 10.2196/71236.
9
Developing a role for patients and the public in the implementation of health and social care research evidence into practice: the PIPER study (Pathways to Implementation for Public Engagement in Research) realist evaluation protocol.让患者和公众在将健康与社会护理研究证据转化为实践中发挥作用:PIPER研究(公众参与研究的实施途径)的实在论评价方案。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jul 14;11(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00728-w.
10
Evidence-based toxicology: a comprehensive framework for causation.循证毒理学:因果关系的综合框架。
Hum Exp Toxicol. 2005 Apr;24(4):161-201. doi: 10.1191/0960327105ht517oa.

本文引用的文献

1
Art-science collaborations in biotechnology research: a transdisciplinary approach.生物技术研究中的艺术与科学合作:一种跨学科方法。
Trends Biotechnol. 2025 Apr;43(4):735-737. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2025.01.009. Epub 2025 Feb 20.
2
Embedded Ethics in Practice: A Toolbox for Integrating the Analysis of Ethical and Social Issues into Healthcare AI Research.实践中的嵌入式伦理:将伦理与社会问题分析融入医疗人工智能研究的工具箱
Sci Eng Ethics. 2024 Dec 24;31(1):3. doi: 10.1007/s11948-024-00523-y.
3
Data hazards in synthetic biology.合成生物学中的数据风险。
Synth Biol (Oxf). 2024 Jun 21;9(1):ysae010. doi: 10.1093/synbio/ysae010. eCollection 2024.
4
Collaborative ethics: innovating collaboration between ethicists and life scientists.合作伦理:伦理学家与生命科学家之间的创新合作
Nat Methods. 2024 Sep;21(9):1571-1574. doi: 10.1038/s41592-024-02320-8.
5
Beyond the Organism versus Machine Dichotomy: A Review of Ethical Concerns in Synthetic Biology.超越生物体与机器的二分法:合成生物学中的伦理问题综述。
ACS Synth Biol. 2024 Jan 19;13(1):3-14. doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.3c00456. Epub 2023 Dec 9.
6
How to embed ethics into laboratory research.如何将伦理道德融入实验室研究。
Account Res. 2024 Oct;31(7):767-785. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2023.2165916. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
7
How to design an art-science program? Self-reported benefits for artists and scientists in the VI4 artist-in-residence program.如何设计一个艺术与科学项目?VI4 驻留艺术家项目中艺术家和科学家的自我报告收益。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 30;17(12):e0279183. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279183. eCollection 2022.
8
Embedded ethics: a proposal for integrating ethics into the development of medical AI.嵌入式伦理:将伦理融入医疗 AI 开发的建议。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Jan 26;23(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00746-3.
9
Recommendations for strengthening the role of embedded researchers to accelerate implementation in health systems: Findings from a state-of-the-art (SOTA) conference workgroup.加强嵌入式研究人员作用以加速卫生系统实施的建议:一项最先进(SOTA)会议工作组的研究结果。
Healthc (Amst). 2021 Jun;8 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):100455. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2020.100455.
10
Ethics parallel research: an approach for (early) ethical guidance of biomedical innovation.伦理平行研究:一种用于生物医学创新(早期)伦理指导的方法。
BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Sep 1;21(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-00524-z.