Bohl Mette, Gregersen Søren, Li Zhihang, Blennow Andreas, Hebelstrup Kim H, Hermansen Kjeld
Steno Diabetes Center Aarhus, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200, Aarhus N, Aarhus, Denmark.
Medical Diagnostic Center, University Clinic for Innovative Patient Pathways, Regional Hospital Central Jutland, Silkeborg, Denmark.
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2025 Jul 21. doi: 10.1038/s41430-025-01646-6.
Genetically modified (GMO) high-amylose barley lowers postprandial glucose. Since certain EU countries do not allow GMO barley, we therefore assessed if high-amylose barley made from traditional breeding (Lean Baking Barley, LBB) lowers postprandial glucose compared to bread made from regular barley (RB) or wheat (WF) in individuals with or without type 2 diabetes (T2D).
In a randomised crossover design, 38 participants (18 T2D and 20 non-T2D) consumed 160 g of bread made from 100% LBB, RB, or WF. Postprandial metabolic responses, appetite and bread perception were measured. A mixed model ANOVA was used for analysis.
LBB bread reduced 4 h postprandial glucose measured as incremental area under the curve (iAUC) by 41% and 39% vs. WF and RB bread in T2D and by 28% and 32% in non-T2D (all, P < 0.05). In T2D, LBB reduced postprandial insulin (iAUC) by 52% and 38% vs. WF and RB, and by 60% vs. WF in non-T2D (all, P < 0.05). Postprandial GIP (iAUC) was lower after LBB in both groups vs. RB and WF (P < 0.05). GLP-1 (iAUC) and FFA (tAUC) were lower after LBB vs. WF in non-T2D (P < 0.05), but not in T2D. Appetite scores were similar for all breads. Overall liking was higher for WF but did not differ between barley types.
LBB breads reduce postprandial glucose and insulin compared to RB and WF bread in individuals irrespective of T2D. LBB may have potential as a functional food in prevention and management of T2D. ClinicalTrails.gov registration: NCT04702672.
转基因(GMO)高直链淀粉大麦可降低餐后血糖。由于某些欧盟国家不允许种植转基因大麦,因此我们评估了与由普通大麦(RB)或小麦(WF)制成的面包相比,传统育种培育的高直链淀粉大麦(精益烘焙大麦,LBB)是否能降低2型糖尿病(T2D)患者或非T2D个体的餐后血糖。
采用随机交叉设计,38名参与者(18名T2D患者和20名非T2D个体)食用了160克由100% LBB、RB或WF制成的面包。测量了餐后代谢反应、食欲和面包口感。采用混合模型方差分析进行分析。
与WF和RB面包相比,LBB面包在T2D患者中使餐后4小时血糖以曲线下增量面积(iAUC)衡量降低了41%和39%,在非T2D个体中降低了28%和32%(均P<0.05)。在T2D患者中,LBB使餐后胰岛素(iAUC)相较于WF和RB分别降低了52%和38%,在非T2D个体中相较于WF降低了60%(均P<0.05)。两组中,LBB餐后的GIP(iAUC)均低于RB和WF(P<0.05)。在非T2D个体中,LBB后的GLP-1(iAUC)和FFA(tAUC)低于WF(P<0.05),但在T2D患者中并非如此。所有面包的食欲评分相似。总体而言,对WF的喜爱度更高,但不同类型大麦面包之间没有差异。
无论是否患有T2D,与RB和WF面包相比,LBB面包均可降低个体的餐后血糖和胰岛素水平。LBB作为功能性食品在T2D的预防和管理方面可能具有潜力。ClinicalTrails.gov注册号:NCT04702672。