Keith S N, Bell R M, Swanson A G, Williams A P
N Engl J Med. 1985 Dec 12;313(24):1519-25. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198512123132406.
In the early 1970s, affirmative-action programs were introduced to accomplish a number of social goals, including increasing the supply of minority physicians and improving the health care of the poor. To assess the success of such programs, we analyzed data on people who graduated from U.S. medical schools in 1975 to determine how specialty choice, practice locations, patient populations served, and board-certification rates differ between minority and nonminority graduates. A larger proportion of minority graduates (55 per cent vs. 41 per cent, P less than 0.001) chose the primary-care specialties of family practice, general internal medicine, general pediatrics, and obstetrics-gynecology. Significantly more minority physicians (12 per cent vs. 6 per cent, P less than 0.01) practiced in locations designated as health-manpower shortage areas by the federal government and had more Medicaid recipients in their patient populations (31 per cent for blacks, 24 per cent for Hispanics, 14 per cent for whites; P less than 0.001). Physicians from each racial or ethnic group served disproportionately more patients of their own racial or ethnic group (P less than 0.001), but minority physicians did not serve significantly more persons from other racial or ethnic minority groups than did nonminority physicians. Many minority physicians served patient populations much like those of their nonminority colleagues, which indicates that substantial integration of the medical marketplace has taken place. Significantly fewer minority graduates had become board-certified by 1984 (48 per cent vs. 80 per cent, P less than 0.001), and most of this disparity was associated with differences in premedical-school characteristics and in the patient populations they served. Our analysis shows that minority graduates of the medical school class of 1975 are fulfilling many of the objectives of affirmative-action programs.
20世纪70年代初,为实现一系列社会目标,包括增加少数族裔医生数量以及改善穷人的医疗保健状况,实施了平权行动计划。为评估此类计划的成效,我们分析了1975年毕业于美国医学院校的人员数据,以确定少数族裔毕业生与非少数族裔毕业生在专业选择、执业地点、服务的患者群体以及获得委员会认证率方面有何差异。更大比例的少数族裔毕业生(55%对41%,P<0.001)选择了家庭医学、普通内科、普通儿科和妇产科这些初级保健专业。显著更多的少数族裔医生(12%对6%,P<0.01)在被联邦政府指定为卫生人力短缺地区的地点执业,且其患者群体中有更多医疗补助接受者(黑人占31%,西班牙裔占24%,白人占14%;P<0.001)。每个种族或族裔群体的医生为其自身种族或族裔群体的患者提供服务的比例过高(P<0.001),但少数族裔医生为其他种族或族裔少数群体服务的人数并不比非少数族裔医生显著更多。许多少数族裔医生服务的患者群体与他们的非少数族裔同事非常相似,这表明医疗市场已实现了实质性融合。到1984年,获得委员会认证的少数族裔毕业生显著更少(48%对80%,P<0.001),而且这种差异大多与医学院校入学前的特征以及他们服务的患者群体差异有关。我们的分析表明,1975年医学院班级的少数族裔毕业生正在实现平权行动计划的许多目标。