• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全国整骨疗法基于实践的研究网络(PBRN)的发展:NCOR研究网络。

Development of a national osteopathic Practice-Based Research Network (PBRN): the NCOR Research Network.

作者信息

Draper-Rodi Jerry, Fawkes Carol, Bailey Daniel

机构信息

National Council for Osteopathic Research, Health Sciences University, 275 Borough High Street, London, SE1 1JE, UK.

Centre for Osteopathic Research and Leadership, UCO School of Osteopathy, Health Sciences University, 275 Borough High Street, London, SE1 1JE, UK.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 21;15(1):26396. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-11527-4.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-11527-4
PMID:40691689
Abstract

This original research details the development of the UK's first osteopathic Practice-Based Research Network (PBRN), the NCOR Research Network, which represents a significant advancement in research capacity. This intellectually coherent framework provides essential baseline data on practitioners, their clinical activities, and patient demographics, with significant potential to influence professional development, education, and healthcare policy. Data were collected through a cross-sectional online survey study conducted between September 2023 and December 2023. The study included 570 osteopaths registered with the General Osteopathic Council who consented to participate in the NCOR Research Network. We examined demographic characteristics of osteopaths, details of their clinical practice, patient demographics, common presenting complaints, treatment approaches, and attitudes towards evidence-based practice. The median age bracket of participants was 50-59 years, with 55% identifying as women. Participants had a median of 17 years of clinical experience. Most worked in private practice (71% as principals, 32% as associates), seeing 20-39 h of patients per week. The majority (87%) regularly treated adults aged 65 or older. Low back pain was the most common complaint seen daily (56%). Spinal articulation/mobilization (79%) and soft tissue massage (78%) were the most frequently used techniques. Participants reported positive views towards evidence-based practice but cited lack of research skills and time as barriers to engagement. The NCOR Research Network provides a foundation for future osteopathic research in the UK. While the sample was not fully representative of UK osteopaths, it offers insights into current osteopathic practice. The network aims to foster collaboration between clinicians and academics, potentially bridging the gap between research and practice in osteopathy. Protocol registration: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/HPWG4.

摘要

这项原创研究详细介绍了英国首个基于整骨疗法实践的研究网络(PBRN)——NCOR研究网络的发展情况,该网络代表了研究能力的重大进步。这个逻辑连贯的框架提供了关于从业者、他们的临床活动以及患者人口统计学的重要基线数据,对专业发展、教育和医疗政策具有重大影响潜力。数据通过2023年9月至2023年12月进行的一项横断面在线调查研究收集。该研究纳入了570名在整骨疗法总会注册并同意参与NCOR研究网络的整骨疗法师。我们研究了整骨疗法师的人口统计学特征、他们临床实践的细节、患者人口统计学、常见就诊主诉、治疗方法以及对循证实践的态度。参与者的年龄中位数在50 - 59岁之间,55%为女性。参与者的临床经验中位数为17年。大多数人从事私人执业(71%为主治医师,32%为助理医师),每周看诊患者20 - 39小时。大多数人(87%)经常治疗65岁及以上的成年人。腰痛是每天最常见的主诉(56%)。脊柱关节调整/松动术(79%)和软组织按摩(78%)是最常用的技术。参与者对循证实践持积极态度,但表示缺乏研究技能和时间是参与的障碍。NCOR研究网络为英国未来的整骨疗法研究奠定了基础。虽然样本并不完全代表英国的整骨疗法师,但它提供了对当前整骨疗法实践的见解。该网络旨在促进临床医生和学者之间的合作,有可能弥合整骨疗法研究与实践之间的差距。方案注册:https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/HPWG4 。

相似文献

1
Development of a national osteopathic Practice-Based Research Network (PBRN): the NCOR Research Network.全国整骨疗法基于实践的研究网络(PBRN)的发展:NCOR研究网络。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 21;15(1):26396. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-11527-4.
2
Characteristics of the practice of New Zealand osteopaths who manage patients with chronic pain.管理慢性疼痛患者的新西兰整骨疗法师的执业特点。
Pain Manag. 2024 Dec;14(12):625-632. doi: 10.1080/17581869.2024.2436836. Epub 2024 Dec 6.
3
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
4
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
5
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
6
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
7
Variation within and between digital pathology and light microscopy for the diagnosis of histopathology slides: blinded crossover comparison study.数字病理学与光学显微镜检查在组织病理学切片诊断中的内部及相互间差异:双盲交叉对比研究
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul;29(30):1-75. doi: 10.3310/SPLK4325.
8
What is the value of routinely testing full blood count, electrolytes and urea, and pulmonary function tests before elective surgery in patients with no apparent clinical indication and in subgroups of patients with common comorbidities: a systematic review of the clinical and cost-effective literature.在没有明显临床指征的患者和常见合并症患者亚组中,在择期手术前常规检测全血细胞计数、电解质和尿素以及肺功能测试的价值:对临床和成本效益文献的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2012 Dec;16(50):i-xvi, 1-159. doi: 10.3310/hta16500.
9
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
10
Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.我们能否加强髋臼周围截骨术的共同决策?一项关于患者体验的定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):120-136. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003198. Epub 2024 Jul 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Investigating the trustworthiness of randomized controlled trials in osteopathic research: a systematic review with meta-analysis.整骨疗法研究中随机对照试验的可信度调查:一项荟萃分析的系统评价
J Clin Epidemiol. 2025 Jul;183:111788. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111788. Epub 2025 Apr 17.
2
The value of allied health professional research engagement on healthcare performance: a systematic review.卫生保健专业人员参与研究对医疗保健绩效的价值:系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jul 18;23(1):766. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09555-9.
3
The Swiss chiropractic practice-based research network: a population-based cross-sectional study to inform future musculoskeletal research.
瑞士整脊实践为基础的研究网络:一项基于人群的横断面研究,旨在为未来的肌肉骨骼研究提供信息。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 6;13(1):5655. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32437-3.
4
Osteopathic practice in the United Kingdom: A retrospective analysis of practice data.英国整骨疗法实践:实践数据的回顾性分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 6;17(7):e0270806. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270806. eCollection 2022.
5
How useful is the Making Every Contact Count Healthy Conversation Skills approach for supporting people with musculoskeletal conditions?“让每次接触都重要”健康对话技能方法在支持肌肉骨骼疾病患者方面有多大作用?
Z Gesundh Wiss. 2022;30(10):2389-2405. doi: 10.1007/s10389-022-01718-y. Epub 2022 May 4.
6
Efficacy and safety of osteopathic manipulative treatment: an overview of systematic reviews.整骨疗法治疗效果和安全性的系统评价综述。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 12;12(4):e053468. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053468.
7
Patient reported outcomes in a large cohort of patients receiving osteopathic care in the United Kingdom.英国接受整骨疗法的大量患者的患者报告结局。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 16;16(4):e0249719. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249719. eCollection 2021.
8
Integration of Improvement and Implementation Science in Practice-Based Research Networks: a Longitudinal, Comparative Case Study.基于实践的研究网络中改进和实施科学的整合:一项纵向、比较案例研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Jun;36(6):1503-1513. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06610-1. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
9
Guidelines for the use of diagnostic imaging in musculoskeletal pain conditions affecting the lower back, knee and shoulder: A scoping review.影响下背部、膝盖和肩部的肌肉骨骼疼痛病症中诊断性成像的使用指南:一项范围综述
Musculoskeletal Care. 2020 Dec;18(4):546-554. doi: 10.1002/msc.1497. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
10
Introducing national osteopathy practice-based research networks in Australia and New Zealand: an overview to inform future osteopathic research.引入澳大利亚和新西兰的国家整骨医学实践为基础的研究网络:为未来的整骨医学研究提供信息概述。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jan 21;10(1):846. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-57918-7.