Triantafyllias Konstantinos, Dapper Ann-Kathrin, Schwarting Andreas
Rheumazentrum Rheinland-Pfalz, Bad Kreuznach, Deutschland.
Schwerpunkt Rheumatologie und klinische Immunologie, I. Med. Klinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland.
Z Rheumatol. 2025 Aug;84(6):452-461. doi: 10.1007/s00393-025-01677-1. Epub 2025 Jul 22.
Systemic inflammatory rheumatic diseases are frequently linked to significant morbidity and, in some cases, can lead to severe, chronic disease courses. Early and effective treatment strategies are required to prevent irreversible damage. Drug-based immunosuppression is not possible for all patients. In such cases the use of alternative treatment, such as immunoadsorption (IA) is of particular interest. Despite positive clinical experiences, the data on the use of IA in rheumatic diseases are limited.
The aim was to analyze the application, efficacy and safety of IA under routine conditions.
In this retrospective study immunoadsorption (IA) treatment was performed 373 times in 31 patients with various rheumatic diseases.
The results show that IA was predominantly used in combination with other medicinal procedures, often as a bridging therapy or as a last resort in complex cases. The treatment showed a good safety profile: 25% of patients experienced mainly mild side effects such as a short-term drops in blood pressure. The use of IA led to a significant reduction in immunoglobulin levels. A positive clinical therapeutic effect was observed in 48% of the cases. Shorter intervals between treatments were associated with a better clinical response (p = 0.004). A correlation between a positive therapeutic effect and the concomitant glucocorticoid therapy could not be established (p = 0.611), which could potentially indicate an independent effect of IA.
The use of IA can be a valuable addition to individualized treatment approaches and should be further evaluated in future studies.
全身性炎性风湿性疾病常与严重的发病率相关,在某些情况下,可导致严重的慢性病程。需要早期有效的治疗策略来预防不可逆转的损害。并非所有患者都能进行基于药物的免疫抑制。在这种情况下,使用替代治疗方法,如免疫吸附(IA),就特别受关注。尽管有积极的临床经验,但关于IA在风湿性疾病中的应用数据有限。
旨在分析常规条件下IA的应用、疗效和安全性。
在这项回顾性研究中,对31例患有各种风湿性疾病的患者进行了373次免疫吸附(IA)治疗。
结果表明,IA主要与其他治疗方法联合使用,通常作为过渡治疗或复杂病例的最后手段。治疗显示出良好的安全性:25%的患者主要经历轻度副作用,如血压短期下降。IA的使用导致免疫球蛋白水平显著降低。48%的病例观察到积极的临床治疗效果。治疗间隔较短与更好的临床反应相关(p = 0.004)。无法确定积极的治疗效果与同时进行的糖皮质激素治疗之间的相关性(p = 0.611),这可能表明IA具有独立作用。
IA的使用可以成为个体化治疗方法的有价值补充,应在未来研究中进一步评估。