Roemer Frank W, Kast Stephanie, Kemmler Wolfgang, Collins Jamie E, Engelke Klaus, Guermazi Ali, Uder Michael, von Stengel Simon
Department of Radiology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen & Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Maximiliansplatz 3, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Quantitative Imaging Center, Department of Radiology, Boston University School of Medicine, 820 Harrison Avenue, FGH Building, 4820 Harrison Avenue, FGH Building, 4th floor, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.
Skeletal Radiol. 2025 Jul 22. doi: 10.1007/s00256-025-04984-5.
OBJECTIVE: Whole-body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) might be an alternative option to conventional strength training for patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Our aim was to compare structural changes of knee OA between patients treated with WB-EMS and a control group (CG) treated with a standard of care approach. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventy-two overweight participants with symptomatic knee OA were assigned to either WB-EMS or CG. MRIs were acquired at baseline and 7 months using a 3 T system. MRIs were read according to the MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score (MOAKS) instrument. Between-group differences in regard to change in cartilage, bone marrow lesions (BMLs), osteophytes, meniscus damage and extrusion, and markers of inflammation were analyzed using Fisher's Exact and Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests. RESULTS: Fewer knees in the WB-EMS groups showed cartilage worsening compared to the CG (18% vs. 40%, p = 0.046). There were fewer knees in the WB-EMS group showing an increase in BML size score of ≥ 1 (30% vs 46%, p = 0.43). Regarding prevalent BMLs that showed improvement, no change, or worsening, no differences were seen (p = 0.56). Little osteophyte and meniscal changes were observed during the observational period. Differences regarding change in inflammatory markers were not significant. CONCLUSION: While there was a difference with fewer subregions showing worsening cartilage damage in the WB-EMS group, no significant differences were observed for change in BMLs, inflammation, osteophytes, and meniscal parameters. The observed improvement in clinical outcome parameters in favor of the WB-EMS group is likely due to other effects than improvement or less worsening of structural changes.
目的:对于膝骨关节炎(OA)患者,全身肌电刺激(WB - EMS)可能是传统力量训练的替代选择。我们的目的是比较接受WB - EMS治疗的患者与采用标准护理方法治疗的对照组(CG)之间膝OA的结构变化。 材料与方法:72名有症状的超重膝OA参与者被分配到WB - EMS组或CG组。在基线和7个月时使用3T系统进行磁共振成像(MRI)检查。根据膝关节骨关节炎MRI评分(MOAKS)工具对MRI进行解读。使用Fisher精确检验和Wilcoxon秩和检验分析两组之间在软骨变化、骨髓损伤(BMLs)、骨赘、半月板损伤和挤出以及炎症标志物方面的差异。 结果:与CG组相比,WB - EMS组中显示软骨恶化的膝关节较少(18%对40%,p = 0.046)。WB - EMS组中BML大小评分增加≥1的膝关节较少(30%对46%,p = 0.43)。对于显示改善、无变化或恶化的普遍BMLs,未观察到差异(p = 0.56)。在观察期内观察到骨赘和半月板变化较小。炎症标志物变化方面的差异不显著。 结论:虽然WB - EMS组中显示软骨损伤恶化的亚区域较少存在差异,但在BMLs、炎症、骨赘和半月板参数变化方面未观察到显著差异。WB - EMS组临床结局参数的观察到的改善可能是由于结构变化改善或恶化较少之外的其他影响。
Skeletal Radiol. 2025-7-22
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-5-22
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2025-6-19
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007-7-18
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-10-21
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-4-17
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-1-31
Lancet. 2025-1-4
Radiology. 2020-5-19
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2019-4-20