Suppr超能文献

阴道臀位分娩与阴道头位分娩产妇及新生儿结局的比较分析:一项回顾性队列研究

Comparative analysis of maternal and neonatal outcomes in cases of vaginal breech births versus cases of vaginal cephalic births: a retrospective cohort study.

作者信息

Kriegs Hanna, Graf Joachim, Abele Harald, Plappert Claudia

机构信息

Section of Midwifery Science, Institute for Health Sciences, University Hospital Tübingen, Calwer Street 7, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.

Department for Women's Health, University Hospital Tübingen, Calwer Street 7, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.

出版信息

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025 Jul 22. doi: 10.1007/s00404-025-08126-z.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study examines whether the perinatal mortality rates (up to 7 days postpartum) of successful vaginal breech birth (VBB) align with those of vaginal cephalic birth (VCB) under the current practice of risk stratification and promotion of VBB in Germany. This study excludes births that did not result in vaginal breech birth, i.e., cases where a vaginal birth was attempted but discontinued.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis of the 2021 German population dataset compared 1435 VBBs to 422,019 VCBs. Maternal and neonatal short-term outcomes were analyzed using Chi-squared and Mann-Whitney U tests.

RESULTS

Main outcome: No significant difference in perinatal mortality rates between VBB and VCB. Other neonatal outcomes: Mean arterial blood gas levels and mean APGAR levels were lower in the breech group. The need for resuscitation measures and transfers to the pediatric hospital were increased. Maternal outcomes: Births in the breech group received labor augmentation more frequently and had higher rates of episiotomies. They had lower rates of perineal tears and postpartum complications. The rates of hysterectomies and increased postpartum hemorrhage did not differ significantly.

CONCLUSION

With thorough risk stratification and interdisciplinary expert management, perinatal mortality rates (up to 7 days postpartum) of VBBs align with VCBs. However, higher neonatal intervention rates in VBB highlight the need to ensure adequate resources and preparedness for postnatal support.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨在德国当前的风险分层和臀位阴道分娩(VBB)推广实践下,成功的臀位阴道分娩(产后7天内)的围产期死亡率是否与头位阴道分娩(VCB)的围产期死亡率一致。本研究排除了未成功进行臀位阴道分娩的情况,即尝试阴道分娩但中途停止的病例。

方法

对2021年德国人口数据集进行回顾性队列分析,将1435例臀位阴道分娩与422,019例头位阴道分娩进行比较。使用卡方检验和曼-惠特尼U检验分析母婴短期结局。

结果

主要结局:臀位阴道分娩和头位阴道分娩的围产期死亡率无显著差异。其他新生儿结局:臀位组的平均动脉血气水平和平均阿氏评分较低。复苏措施的需求和转至儿科医院的情况增加。产妇结局:臀位组分娩时更频繁地使用引产,会阴切开率更高。会阴撕裂和产后并发症的发生率较低。子宫切除术和产后出血增加的发生率无显著差异。

结论

通过全面的风险分层和跨学科专家管理,臀位阴道分娩(产后7天内)的围产期死亡率与头位阴道分娩一致。然而,臀位阴道分娩中较高的新生儿干预率凸显了确保有足够资源和产后支持准备的必要性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验