Milford Stephen R
Institute for Biomedical Ethics, Basel University, Basel, Switzerland.
Department of Theology, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa.
Glob Bioeth. 2025 Jul 21;36(1):2532920. doi: 10.1080/11287462.2025.2532920. eCollection 2025.
Dementia is responsible for untold suffering, most significant is the fear that someone will lose themselves. This fear raises very serious pastoral questions: Who is the person living with dementia? Are they the same person they have always been or someone new? In either case, how do we treat them? Using the well-known case of Margo and the discussions between Dworkin and Dresser around advanced care directives, this article radically challenges the standard psychology view of personhood as being pastorally unhelpful in dementia cases. We argue that a relational view of personhood is not only epistemologically consistent but better suited to the pastoral challenge presented by dementia than that of the standard psychological view. While dementia represents the loss of cognitive abilities, and in many cases an entire change in personality, it does not represent either the loss of a person nor a change of personhood. Through dementia a person remains a person because they are personally related to by the same community of persons who have always loved them. This normative framework offers those living with dementia, their community, and their carers with a coherent, yet pastorally helpful response to the existential questions raised by dementia.
痴呆症造成了难以言表的痛苦,其中最严重的是担心有人会迷失自我。这种担忧引发了非常严肃的牧师问题:患有痴呆症的人是谁?他们还是原来的那个人,还是变成了一个新人?不管是哪种情况,我们该如何对待他们?本文以玛戈的著名案例以及德沃金和德雷瑟围绕生前预嘱展开的讨论为例,从根本上挑战了将人格视为对痴呆症病例毫无牧师帮助的标准心理学观点。我们认为,人格的关系性观点不仅在认识论上是一致的,而且比标准心理学观点更适合应对痴呆症带来的牧师挑战。虽然痴呆症意味着认知能力的丧失,在许多情况下还意味着性格的彻底改变,但它既不代表一个人的丧失,也不代表人的身份改变。通过痴呆症,一个人仍然是一个人,因为他们与一直爱他们的同一群人有着个人联系。这个规范框架为患有痴呆症的人、他们的社区以及他们的护理人员提供了一个连贯且对牧师有帮助的回应,以应对痴呆症引发的生存问题。