Grgic Valentina, Grossio Ludovico, Mulasso Anna, Boccia Gennaro, Rainoldi Alberto
Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Neuromuscular Function Research Group, School of Exercise and Sport Science, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy.
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2025 Jun 26;10(3):243. doi: 10.3390/jfmk10030243.
: Whole-body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) combines full-body electrical muscle stimulation with instructor-assigned exercise. Electrical impulses are transmitted to the peripheral muscles through electrodes applied to the body. This study compared two training methodologies, WB-EMS training and traditional resistance training, to determine which approach leads to greater strength improvement in terms of 1-repetition maximum (1-RM). : Twenty sedentary women participated in a 10 weeks protocol with five evaluations conducted every two weeks. The WB-EMS group trained for 20 min per week, and the resistance training group (RT) performed an average of two training sessions per week, lasting 60 min each. Both groups were evaluated using three exercises: back squat and hammer curl (1-RM), and plank exercise (time to exhaustion). : Both groups increased their performance in squat (WB-EMS +36%, = 0.0001; RT +34%, = 0.0001), curl (WB-EMS +42%, = 0.0001; RT +33%, = 0.0001), and plank (WB-EMS +103%, = 0.0001; RT +65%, = 0.0001). No significant time × training interaction was found for any exercise, indicating that the two groups improved similarly. : Although WB-EMS did not confer greater strength improvement than traditional resistance training, it offers a time-efficient alternative, achieving similar results with reduced time commitment.
全身肌电刺激(WB - EMS)将全身电肌肉刺激与教练指导的运动相结合。电脉冲通过贴在身体上的电极传输到外周肌肉。本研究比较了两种训练方法,即WB - EMS训练和传统阻力训练,以确定哪种方法在1次重复最大值(1 - RM)方面能带来更大的力量提升。20名久坐不动的女性参与了一项为期10周的方案,每两周进行五次评估。WB - EMS组每周训练20分钟,阻力训练组(RT)平均每周进行两次训练,每次持续60分钟。两组均通过三项运动进行评估:后深蹲和锤式弯举(1 - RM)以及平板支撑运动(疲劳时间)。两组在深蹲(WB - EMS组提升36%,P = 0.0001;RT组提升34%,P = 0.0001)、弯举(WB - EMS组提升42%,P = 0.0001;RT组提升33%,P = 0.0001)和平板支撑(WB - EMS组提升103%,P = 0.0001;RT组提升65%,P = 0.0001)方面的表现均有所提高。对于任何一项运动,均未发现显著的时间×训练交互作用,表明两组的改善情况相似。虽然WB - EMS在力量提升方面并不比传统阻力训练更显著,但它提供了一种省时的替代方案,以更少的训练时间投入取得了相似的结果。