• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

爱丁堡大学的生物科学家们开放数据实践的兴起。

The rise of open data practices among bioscientists at the University of Edinburgh.

作者信息

Deeb Haya, Creasey Suzanna, de Ugarte Diego Lucini, Strevens George, Usman Trisha, Wong Hwee Yun, Kutzer Megan A M, Wilson Emma, Zieliński Tomasz, Millar Andrew J

机构信息

Centre for Engineering Biology and School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Institute of Ecology and Evolution and School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Jul 23;20(7):e0328065. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328065. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0328065
PMID:40700356
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12286402/
Abstract

Open science promotes the accessibility of scientific research and data, emphasising transparency, reproducibility, and collaboration. This study assesses the Openness and FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) aspects of data-sharing practices within the biosciences at the University of Edinburgh from 2014 to 2023. We analysed 555 research papers across biotechnology, regenerative medicine, infectious diseases, and non-communicable diseases. Our scoring system evaluated data completeness, reusability, accessibility, and licensing, finding a progressive shift towards better data-sharing practices. The fraction of publications that share all relevant data increased significantly, from 7% in 2014 to 45% in 2023. Data involving genomic sequences were shared more frequently than image data or data on human subjects or samples. The presence of data availability statement (DAS) or preprint sharing correlated with more and better data sharing, particularly in terms of completeness. We discuss local and systemic factors underlying the current and future Open data sharing. Evaluating the automated ODDPub (Open Data Detection in Publications) tool on this manually-scored dataset demonstrated high specificity in identifying cases where no data was shared. ODDPub sensitivity improved with better documentation in the DAS. This positive trend highlights improvements in data-sharing, advocating for continued advances and addressing challenges with data types and documentation.

摘要

开放科学促进了科学研究和数据的可获取性,强调透明度、可重复性和协作性。本研究评估了2014年至2023年爱丁堡大学在生物科学领域内数据共享实践的开放性和FAIR(可查找、可获取、可互操作和可重用)方面。我们分析了生物技术、再生医学、传染病和非传染性疾病领域的555篇研究论文。我们的评分系统对数据的完整性、可重用性、可获取性和许可进行了评估,发现数据共享实践正逐步朝着更好的方向转变。共享所有相关数据的出版物比例显著增加,从2014年的7%增至2023年的45%。涉及基因组序列的数据比图像数据或关于人类受试者或样本的数据共享得更频繁。数据可用性声明(DAS)或预印本共享的存在与更多且更好的数据共享相关,尤其是在完整性方面。我们讨论了当前及未来开放数据共享背后的局部和系统因素。在这个人工评分的数据集上评估自动化的ODDPub(出版物中的开放数据检测)工具,结果表明在识别未共享数据的情况时具有高特异性。随着DAS中文档记录的改善,ODDPub的灵敏度有所提高。这一积极趋势凸显了数据共享方面的进步,倡导持续推进并应对数据类型和文档记录方面的挑战。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecf8/12286402/e99323a43882/pone.0328065.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecf8/12286402/0ce3d7514227/pone.0328065.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecf8/12286402/eed03b5fe082/pone.0328065.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecf8/12286402/cd857a97d156/pone.0328065.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecf8/12286402/e99323a43882/pone.0328065.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecf8/12286402/0ce3d7514227/pone.0328065.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecf8/12286402/eed03b5fe082/pone.0328065.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecf8/12286402/cd857a97d156/pone.0328065.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecf8/12286402/e99323a43882/pone.0328065.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
The rise of open data practices among bioscientists at the University of Edinburgh.爱丁堡大学的生物科学家们开放数据实践的兴起。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 23;20(7):e0328065. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328065. eCollection 2025.
2
Daily life in the Open Biologist's second job, as a Data Curator.开放生物学家的第二份工作——数据管理员的日常生活。
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Dec 5;9:523. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.22899.1. eCollection 2024.
3
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
4
Sertindole for schizophrenia.用于治疗精神分裂症的舍吲哚。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD001715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001715.pub2.
5
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
6
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
7
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
8
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
9
"A System That Wasn't Really Optimized for Me": Factors Influencing Autistic University Students' Access to Information.“一个并非真正为我优化的系统”:影响自闭症大学生获取信息的因素
Autism Adulthood. 2025 Apr 3;7(2):171-184. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0139. eCollection 2025 Apr.
10
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Data sharing in circadian rhythm and mental health research: current status, challenges, recommendations and future directions.昼夜节律与心理健康研究中的数据共享:现状、挑战、建议及未来方向
BMJ Ment Health. 2024 Dec 22;27(1):e301333. doi: 10.1136/bmjment-2024-301333.
2
Daily life in the Open Biologist's second job, as a Data Curator.开放生物学家的第二份工作——数据管理员的日常生活。
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Dec 5;9:523. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.22899.1. eCollection 2024.
3
Sharing brain imaging data in the Open Science era: how and why?
开放科学时代的脑影像数据共享:如何与为何?
Lancet Digit Health. 2024 Jul;6(7):e526-e535. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00069-4.
4
Workflow for detecting biomedical articles with underlying open and restricted-access datasets.检测具有潜在开放和限制访问数据集的生物医学文章的工作流程。
PLoS One. 2024 May 8;19(5):e0302787. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302787. eCollection 2024.
5
Prevalence and predictors of data and code sharing in the medical and health sciences: systematic review with meta-analysis of individual participant data.在医学和健康科学领域中,数据和代码共享的流行率及其预测因素:基于个体参与者数据的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2023 Jul 11;382:e075767. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-075767.
6
Biomedical supervisors' role modeling of open science practices.生物医学导师对开放科学实践的榜样作用。
Elife. 2023 May 22;12:e83484. doi: 10.7554/eLife.83484.
7
DORA-compliant measures of research quality and impact to assess the performance of researchers in biomedical institutions: Review of published research, international best practice and Delphi survey.符合 DORA 标准的研究质量和影响力衡量指标,用于评估生物医学机构研究人员的表现:已发表研究的回顾、国际最佳实践和德尔菲调查。
PLoS One. 2023 May 12;18(5):e0270616. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270616. eCollection 2023.
8
Why don't we share data and code? Perceived barriers and benefits to public archiving practices.为什么我们不共享数据和代码?对公共存档实践的感知障碍和收益。
Proc Biol Sci. 2022 Nov 30;289(1987):20221113. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2022.1113. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
9
Modeling community standards for metadata as templates makes data FAIR.将元数据的社区标准建模为模板可使数据变得 FAIR。
Sci Data. 2022 Nov 12;9(1):696. doi: 10.1038/s41597-022-01815-3.
10
How often do cancer researchers make their data and code available and what factors are associated with sharing?癌症研究人员多久会分享他们的数据和代码,以及哪些因素与分享有关?
BMC Med. 2022 Nov 9;20(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02644-2.