• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伊朗农业灌溉中柴油与电网电力的比较生命周期评估:为何在依赖化石燃料的电网中柴油表现更优。

Comparative LCA of diesel and grid electricity for agricultural irrigation in Iran: why diesel outperforms in fossil-reliant grids.

作者信息

Namdari Majid

机构信息

Department of Plant Production and Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Jul 23;20(7):e0324371. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324371. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0324371
PMID:40700457
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12286319/
Abstract

This study presents a comparative environmental impact assessment of well water extraction systems employed for agricultural irrigation in Iran, focusing on two prevalent energy sources: diesel engines and grid-connected electricity. Utilizing life cycle assessment methodology, the research evaluates key environmental indicators, encompassing abiotic depletion, global warming potential (GWP), human toxicity, aquatic ecotoxicity, acidification, eutrophication, and photochemical oxidation. Data collected from 100 agricultural wells were analyzed to compare the environmental performance of each energy source. The objective is to provide policymakers with data-driven insights for the development of effective mitigation strategies. Environmental analysis revealed that diesel systems emit 1.34 kg CO2/m3, compared to 1.59 kg CO2/m3 in grid systems. While grid-connected systems avoid on-farm emissions, they suffer from high upstream impacts due to Iran's fossil fuel-dominant electricity generation mix (94%). The diesel system showed lower impacts in seven of eleven categories, including GWP, abiotic depletion, and marine ecotoxicity. In contrast, grid systems had slightly lower values in eutrophication (5.29 × 10-4 vs. 1.66 × 10-3 kg PO4 eq) and ozone layer depletion. The overall Environmental Composite Index (ECI) was 3.68 × 10-4 nPt for diesel and 5.77 × 10-4 nPt for electricity, indicating a 56.79% higher burden for the grid-powered system. The findings emphasize the role of local energy mix, pump efficiency, and transmission losses in environmental outcomes, suggesting that improvements in Iran's grid efficiency and a transition to renewable energy are key to reducing impacts.

摘要

本研究对伊朗农业灌溉中使用的井水提取系统进行了比较环境影响评估,重点关注两种常见能源:柴油发动机和并网电力。利用生命周期评估方法,该研究评估了关键环境指标,包括非生物耗竭、全球变暖潜势(GWP)、人体毒性、水生生态毒性、酸化、富营养化和光化学氧化。分析了从100口农业井收集的数据,以比较每种能源的环境绩效。目的是为政策制定者提供数据驱动的见解,以制定有效的缓解策略。环境分析表明,柴油系统每立方米排放1.34千克二氧化碳,而电网系统为1.59千克二氧化碳。虽然并网系统避免了农场内的排放,但由于伊朗以化石燃料为主的发电结构(94%),它们受到较高的上游影响。柴油系统在11个类别中的7个类别中影响较低,包括全球变暖潜势、非生物耗竭和海洋生态毒性。相比之下,电网系统在富营养化(5.29×10-4对1.66×10-3千克磷酸根当量)和臭氧层损耗方面的值略低。柴油的总体环境综合指数(ECI)为3.68×10-4 nPt,电力为5.77×10-4 nPt,表明电网供电系统的负担高出56.79%。研究结果强调了当地能源结构、泵效率和传输损耗在环境结果中的作用,表明提高伊朗电网效率和向可再生能源转型是减少影响的关键。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77b4/12286319/b9915589e261/pone.0324371.g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77b4/12286319/a888c7cee5b3/pone.0324371.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77b4/12286319/d3a2f544199a/pone.0324371.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77b4/12286319/289836a26990/pone.0324371.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77b4/12286319/7ae96d23cfcd/pone.0324371.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77b4/12286319/dfd30aa26bca/pone.0324371.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77b4/12286319/a90723b8c0c0/pone.0324371.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77b4/12286319/65366f9b131b/pone.0324371.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77b4/12286319/7736b09d062c/pone.0324371.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77b4/12286319/5c66066d6beb/pone.0324371.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77b4/12286319/94042de019d6/pone.0324371.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77b4/12286319/b9915589e261/pone.0324371.g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77b4/12286319/a888c7cee5b3/pone.0324371.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77b4/12286319/d3a2f544199a/pone.0324371.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77b4/12286319/289836a26990/pone.0324371.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77b4/12286319/7ae96d23cfcd/pone.0324371.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77b4/12286319/dfd30aa26bca/pone.0324371.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77b4/12286319/a90723b8c0c0/pone.0324371.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77b4/12286319/65366f9b131b/pone.0324371.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77b4/12286319/7736b09d062c/pone.0324371.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77b4/12286319/5c66066d6beb/pone.0324371.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77b4/12286319/94042de019d6/pone.0324371.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77b4/12286319/b9915589e261/pone.0324371.g011.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative LCA of diesel and grid electricity for agricultural irrigation in Iran: why diesel outperforms in fossil-reliant grids.伊朗农业灌溉中柴油与电网电力的比较生命周期评估:为何在依赖化石燃料的电网中柴油表现更优。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 23;20(7):e0324371. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324371. eCollection 2025.
2
Precision feeding as a tool to reduce the environmental footprint of pig production systems: a life-cycle assessment.精准饲养作为减少猪生产系统环境足迹的工具:生命周期评估。
J Anim Sci. 2024 Jan 3;102. doi: 10.1093/jas/skae225.
3
How Can the Environmental Impact of Orthopaedic Surgery Be Measured and Reduced? Using Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction as a Test Case.如何衡量和减少骨科手术对环境的影响?以前交叉韧带重建为例进行分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):7-19. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003242.
4
Comparison of the emission factors of air pollutants from gasoline, CNG, LPG and diesel fueled vehicles at idle speed.比较汽油、CNG、LPG 和柴油燃料车辆在怠速时的空气污染物排放因子。
Environ Pollut. 2022 Jul 15;305:119296. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119296. Epub 2022 Apr 12.
5
[Comparative life cycle environmental assessment between electric taxi and gasoline taxi in Beijing].[北京电动出租车与汽油出租车的生命周期环境影响比较评估]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2015 Mar;36(3):1105-16.
6
Developing a carbon footprint model and environmental impact analysis of municipal solid waste transportation: A case study of Tehran, Iran.开发城市固体废物运输的碳足迹模型和环境影响分析:以伊朗德黑兰为例。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2023 Dec;73(12):890-901. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2023.2271424. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
7
Integrated multivariate and life cycle assessment of heavy metal contamination in sediments from arid-region water reservoirs in Iran with reuse scenario evaluation.伊朗干旱地区水库沉积物中重金属污染的综合多变量和生命周期评估及再利用情景评估。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2025 Jun;32(27):16413-16431. doi: 10.1007/s11356-025-36675-y. Epub 2025 Jun 26.
8
Estimates of emissions from hydrogen transportation fueling infrastructure and vehicles.氢运输燃料基础设施和车辆的排放估算。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2025 Jul;75(7):559-590. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2025.2495811. Epub 2025 Jun 16.
9
Occupational Exposure to Engine Exhausts and Prostate Cancer Risk.职业性接触发动机尾气与前列腺癌风险
Environ Health. 2025 Jul 25;24(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12940-025-01205-3.
10
Microplastics and heavy metals emissions from healthcare waste management: A comparative life cycle assessment.
Waste Manag. 2025 Aug 1;204:114932. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2025.114932. Epub 2025 Jun 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Microbial mechanisms for higher hydrogen production in anaerobic digestion at constant temperature versus gradient heating.在恒温与梯度加热条件下厌氧消化中提高氢气产量的微生物机制。
Microbiome. 2024 Sep 10;12(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s40168-024-01908-8.
2
Impacts of Fuel Stage Ratio on the Morphological and Nanostructural Characteristics of Soot Emissions from a Twin Annular Premixing Swirler Combustor.燃料级比对双环预混旋流燃烧室碳烟排放的形态和纳米结构特征的影响。
Environ Sci Technol. 2024 Jun 18;58(24):10558-10566. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.4c03478. Epub 2024 Jun 4.
3
Techno-economic and environmental analysis of renewable energy integration in irrigation systems: A comparative study of standalone and grid-connected PV/diesel generator systems in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.
灌溉系统中可再生能源整合的技术经济与环境分析:开伯尔-普赫图赫瓦省独立式和并网式光伏/柴油发电机系统的比较研究
Heliyon. 2024 May 10;10(10):e31025. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31025. eCollection 2024 May 30.
4
How do environmental regulations affect carbon emission and energy efficiency patterns? A provincial-level analysis of Chinese energy-intensive industries.环境规制如何影响碳排放和能源效率模式?中国能源密集型产业的省级分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jan;29(3):3446-3462. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-15843-w. Epub 2021 Aug 13.
5
Trends in Water Use, Energy Consumption, and Carbon Emissions from Irrigation: Role of Shifting Technologies and Energy Sources.灌溉用水、能源消耗和碳排放的趋势:技术和能源来源转变的作用。
Environ Sci Technol. 2020 Dec 1;54(23):15329-15337. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c02897. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
6
A novel and simple approach to the good process performance of methane recovery from lignocellulosic biomass alone.一种新颖且简单的方法,可单独从木质纤维素生物质中实现良好的甲烷回收工艺性能。
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2016 Jun 1;9:115. doi: 10.1186/s13068-016-0530-1. eCollection 2016.