Suppr超能文献

经颅磁刺激疗法治疗阿尔茨海默病时针对背外侧前额叶皮质的靶向方法中的电场变化。

Electric field variations across DLPFC targeting methods in TMS therapy for Alzheimer's disease.

作者信息

Wu Nianshuang, Shao Yuxuan, Wu Zhen, Zhu Shuxiang, Wang Penghao, Zhu Ziyan, Zhang Cheng, Wu Changzhe, Huo Xiaolin, Lin Hua, Zhang Guanghao

机构信息

Beijing Key Laboratory of Bioelectromagnetism, Institute of Electrical Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; School of Electronic, Electrical and Communication Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.

Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China.

出版信息

Neuroimage Clin. 2025 Jul 17;48:103847. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2025.103847.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is crucial for cognitive control and a primary target for transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, understanding the distribution of TMS-induced electric field (E-field) across different targeting methods remains limited, as does its relationship to therapeutic outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

This study assesses differences in TMS-induced E-field using functional versus anatomical targeting methods for DLPFC stimulation.

METHODS

Functional and anatomical targets were identified in 30 (11 M/19F) AD patients and 30 (13 M/17F) age-matched healthy controls (HCs) using T1 and fMRI data. E-field characteristics, including magnitude (E) and normal component (E), were calculated via SimNIBS software for comparisons across stimulation targets.

RESULTS

Functional targeting showed greater spatial dispersion compared to anatomical targeting in both groups. Significant E-field differences were observed between the functional target and adjacent anatomical regions when the coil was positioned over the functional target in both groups. Optimal coil orientation exhibited directional specificity: parallel alignment with the LOI E-field produced higher field intensity in the functional target compared to the anatomical target (AD patients: P < 0.001; HCs: P = 0.052), while perpendicular orientation maintained functional stability with reduced anatomical interference (both groups: P < 0.001). And significant variations in E-field ratios were observed across coil orientations.

CONCLUSION

This study reveals key E-field disparities across DLPFC targeting approaches and establishes coil orientation optimization as a critical strategy to improve TMS precision, offering actionable insights for developing personalized protocols in AD therapy that may enhance treatment efficacy while minimizing adverse effects.

摘要

背景

背外侧前额叶皮质(DLPFC)对认知控制至关重要,是阿尔茨海默病(AD)经颅磁刺激(TMS)的主要靶点。然而,对于不同靶向方法下TMS诱导电场(E场)的分布及其与治疗效果的关系,目前的了解仍然有限。

目的

本研究评估使用功能靶向与解剖靶向方法刺激DLPFC时TMS诱导E场的差异。

方法

利用T1和功能磁共振成像(fMRI)数据,在30例(11男/19女)AD患者和30例(13男/17女)年龄匹配的健康对照(HC)中确定功能靶点和解剖靶点。通过SimNIBS软件计算E场特征,包括大小(E)和法向分量(E),以比较不同刺激靶点。

结果

在两组中,功能靶向显示出比解剖靶向更大的空间分散性。当线圈置于两组的功能靶点上方时,在功能靶点与相邻解剖区域之间观察到显著的E场差异。最佳线圈方向表现出方向特异性:与感兴趣线(LOI)E场平行排列时,功能靶点中的场强高于解剖靶点(AD患者:P < 0.001;HC:P = 0.052),而垂直方向可保持功能稳定性并减少解剖干扰(两组:P < 0.001)。并且在不同线圈方向上观察到E场比率的显著变化。

结论

本研究揭示了DLPFC靶向方法之间关键的E场差异,并将线圈方向优化确立为提高TMS精度的关键策略,为制定AD治疗个性化方案提供了可行的见解,这可能提高治疗效果同时将不良反应降至最低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c19e/12305317/80030b0fee06/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验