• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索伊朗医疗服务提供者对安乐死的态度:影响因素的系统评价

Exploring attitudes toward euthanasia in Iranian healthcare providers: a systematic review of influencing factors.

作者信息

Fard Moghadam Nazanin, Hassani Azin, Khaninezhad Loghman

机构信息

Student Research Committee, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran, Islamic Republic of.

Department of Medical-Surgical Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran, Islamic Republic of.

出版信息

Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2025 Jul 23;20(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s13010-025-00186-y.

DOI:10.1186/s13010-025-00186-y
PMID:40702485
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Euthanasia is a polarizing topic in healthcare, particularly in Iran, where Islamic principles emphasizing the sanctity of life shape ethical perspectives. Understanding the attitudes of Iranian healthcare providers toward euthanasia and the factors influencing these views is critical, given the cultural and religious context. The primary objective of this study was to systematically identify and synthesize the key factors influencing healthcare providers' attitudes toward euthanasia in Iran.

METHODS

Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Magiran, and SID databases up to March 10, 2025. Inclusion criteria encompassed observational studies reporting quantitative data on euthanasia attitudes among Iranian healthcare providers. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the Joanna Briggs Institute tools. Due to heterogeneity in study designs and measurement tools, a narrative synthesis was performed.

RESULTS

Of 595 identified records, 36 studies involving 7,790 participants met inclusion criteria. Attitudes toward euthanasia were predominantly cautious or negative, with stronger opposition among older providers, females, and those with deep religious beliefs. Younger age, male gender, clinical experience, and exposure to terminal patients correlated with more positive attitudes. Religious and cultural factors, particularly Islamic teachings, were significant barriers to acceptance, while urban settings and higher education were linked to neutral or mixed views.

CONCLUSION

Iranian healthcare providers' attitudes toward euthanasia reflect a complex interplay of religious, cultural, and professional influences. These findings underscore the need for enhanced palliative care and ethical training in Iran's healthcare system to address end-of-life dilemmas while respecting cultural boundaries.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

Not applicable.

摘要

背景

安乐死是医疗保健领域一个极具争议的话题,在伊朗尤其如此,在那里强调生命神圣性的伊斯兰原则塑造了伦理观念。鉴于文化和宗教背景,了解伊朗医疗保健提供者对安乐死的态度以及影响这些观点的因素至关重要。本研究的主要目的是系统地识别和综合影响伊朗医疗保健提供者对安乐死态度的关键因素。

方法

遵循PRISMA指南,截至2025年3月10日,在PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science、Magiran和SID数据库中进行了系统检索。纳入标准包括报告伊朗医疗保健提供者对安乐死态度的定量数据的观察性研究。两名评审员独立筛选研究、提取数据,并使用乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的工具评估偏倚风险。由于研究设计和测量工具的异质性,进行了叙述性综合分析。

结果

在595条识别出的记录中,36项研究涉及7790名参与者,符合纳入标准。对安乐死的态度主要是谨慎或消极的,年龄较大的提供者、女性以及宗教信仰深厚的人反对态度更强。年龄较小、男性、临床经验以及接触临终患者与更积极的态度相关。宗教和文化因素,特别是伊斯兰教义,是接受安乐死观念的重大障碍,而城市环境和高等教育与中立或混合观点有关。

结论

伊朗医疗保健提供者对安乐死的态度反映了宗教、文化和专业影响的复杂相互作用。这些发现强调了在伊朗医疗保健系统中加强姑息治疗和伦理培训的必要性,以解决临终困境,同时尊重文化界限。

临床试验编号

不适用。

相似文献

1
Exploring attitudes toward euthanasia in Iranian healthcare providers: a systematic review of influencing factors.探索伊朗医疗服务提供者对安乐死的态度:影响因素的系统评价
Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2025 Jul 23;20(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s13010-025-00186-y.
2
"Healthcare professionals' attitudes towards euthanasia in the Balearic Islands.".巴利阿里群岛医疗保健专业人员对安乐死的态度。
BMC Med Ethics. 2025 Jul 19;26(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01262-w.
3
Awareness and attitudes toward fertility preservation among healthcare providers: a scoping review of quantitative evidence.医疗保健提供者对生育力保存的认识和态度:定量证据的范围综述
Hum Reprod Update. 2025 Sep 1;31(5):497-511. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmaf014.
4
The impact of educational interventions on attitudes of emergency department staff towards patients with substance-related presentations: a quantitative systematic review.教育干预措施对急诊科工作人员对待物质相关疾病患者态度的影响:一项定量系统评价。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2017 Aug;15(8):2153-2181. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003006.
5
The experience of adults who choose watchful waiting or active surveillance as an approach to medical treatment: a qualitative systematic review.选择观察等待或主动监测作为治疗方法的成年人的经历:一项定性系统评价。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Feb;14(2):174-255. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2270.
6
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.
7
Women's experience of menopause: a systematic review of qualitative evidence.女性更年期经历:定性证据的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Sep 16;13(8):250-337. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1948.
8
Effectiveness of culturally focused interventions in increasing the satisfaction of hospitalized Asian patients: a systematic review.以文化为重点的干预措施对提高住院亚洲患者满意度的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Aug;14(8):219-56. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003048.
9
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
10
The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.医疗机构内协作的测量:对测量工具属性的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of openness to experience personality trait on attitudes of medical students toward euthanasia: the moderating role of spiritual intelligence.经验开放性人格特质对医学生安乐死态度的影响:精神智力的调节作用。
Eur J Transl Myol. 2023 Oct 10;33(4):11845. doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2023.11845.
2
The Attitude of Iranian Critical Care Nurses Toward Euthanasia: A Multicenter Cross-sectional Study.伊朗重症监护护士对安乐死的态度:一项多中心横断面研究。
Crit Care Nurs Q. 2022;45(1):62-73. doi: 10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000389.
3
Comparison of attitude of nurses and nursing students toward euthanasia.
护士和护理学生对安乐死的态度比较。
Nurs Ethics. 2022 Feb;29(1):208-216. doi: 10.1177/0969733021999751. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
4
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
5
Methodological quality of case series studies: an introduction to the JBI critical appraisal tool.病例系列研究的方法学质量:JBI 批判性评价工具介绍。
JBI Evid Synth. 2020 Oct;18(10):2127-2133. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00099.
6
Attitude of nurses towards euthanasia: a cross-sectional study in Iran.护士对安乐死的态度:伊朗的一项横断面研究。
Int J Palliat Nurs. 2019 Jun 2;25(6):274-282. doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2019.25.6.274.
7
Physicians and nurses' knowledge and attitudes towards advance directives for cancer patients in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯的医生和护士对癌症患者预先指示的知识和态度。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 12;14(4):e0213938. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213938. eCollection 2019.
8
Attitudes toward euthanasia among hospice nurses: Political ideology or religious commitment?临终关怀护士对安乐死的态度:政治意识形态还是宗教信仰?
Death Stud. 2020;44(3):195-200. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2018.1539050. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
9
Finnish nurses' attitudes towards their role in the euthanasia process.芬兰护士对其在安乐死过程中角色的态度。
Nurs Ethics. 2019 May;26(3):700-714. doi: 10.1177/0969733017720850. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
10
Nursing Student Attitudes toward Euthanasia: A Cross-Sectional Study.护生对安乐死的态度:一项横断面研究。
Nurs Ethics. 2019 Mar;26(2):496-503. doi: 10.1177/0969733017718393. Epub 2017 Jul 27.