Ao Qi, Chen Jindong, Xie Yingguang, Wang Yonghua, Wang Xiaoxi, Liu Feng, Bai Zhigang, Zhao Shuaifei, Du Xiaoyan, Zhang Liang, Gao Xiaoyu, Suyalatu Xin
Ordos School of Clinical Medicine Orthopedics Department, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Ordos, Inner Mongolia, China.
Orthopedics Department, Tengzhou Central People's Hospital, Tengzhou, Shandong, China.
J Cell Mol Med. 2025 Jul;29(14):e70690. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.70690.
The stability of the knee joint following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) restoration combined with medial collateral ligament (MCL) injury repair is crucial. It is yet unknown how posterior oblique ligament (POL) suturing functions in these procedures. This study aimed to assess the impact of POL repair on knee joint stability in patients undergoing ACL reconstruction with MCL repair. We hypothesised that POL repair would further enhance knee joint stability compared to conservative treatment in patients with combined ACL and MCL injuries. A total of 104 patients with ACL and grade III MCL injuries were enrolled and divided into the experimental group (n = 53, POL repair) and the control group (n = 51, conservative treatment for POL injury). Knee stability was assessed using Ligs Digital Arthrometer (measuring tibial displacement and medial separation) and the Dial test (measuring external tibial rotation). Knee function was evaluated with IKDC, Lysholm, VAS and ROM scores at baseline and 12-month follow-up. Both groups showed significant improvements in tibial displacement (ACL SSD) and medial separation (MCL SSD) after surgery compared to baseline (p < 0.05). However, intergroup comparisons indicated no statistically significant changes in knee stability metrics (p > 0.05). Functional scores (IKDC, Lysholm, ROM and VAS) improved considerably in both groups from baseline, with no significant differences between groups (p > 0.05). The Dial test revealed a substantial decrease of external tibial rotation in both groups postoperatively, with no intergroup variations. While ACL reconstruction and MCL repair significantly improved knee joint stability, POL suturing did not have a significant impact on the overall knee stability in patients with ACL and MCL injuries.
前交叉韧带(ACL)修复联合内侧副韧带(MCL)损伤修复后膝关节的稳定性至关重要。目前尚不清楚后斜韧带(POL)缝合在这些手术中的作用。本研究旨在评估POL修复对接受ACL重建联合MCL修复患者膝关节稳定性的影响。我们假设,与ACL和MCL联合损伤患者的保守治疗相比,POL修复将进一步提高膝关节稳定性。共纳入104例ACL和III级MCL损伤患者,分为实验组(n = 53,POL修复)和对照组(n = 51,POL损伤保守治疗)。使用Ligs数字关节测量仪(测量胫骨位移和内侧分离)和Dial试验(测量胫骨外旋)评估膝关节稳定性。在基线和12个月随访时,用IKDC、Lysholm、VAS和ROM评分评估膝关节功能。与基线相比,两组术后胫骨位移(ACL SSD)和内侧分离(MCL SSD)均有显著改善(p < 0.05)。然而,组间比较表明膝关节稳定性指标无统计学显著变化(p > 0.05)。两组功能评分(IKDC、Lysholm、ROM和VAS)从基线开始均有显著改善,组间无显著差异(p > 0.05)。Dial试验显示两组术后胫骨外旋均显著降低,组间无差异。虽然ACL重建和MCL修复显著改善了膝关节稳定性,但POL缝合对ACL和MCL损伤患者的整体膝关节稳定性没有显著影响。