• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“两全其美”:建立社区与学术机构的伙伴关系,以便与受法律系统影响的个人开展研究。

The "Best of Both Worlds": Building a community-academic partnership for research with legal system-impacted individuals.

作者信息

Cohen Talia R, Reece Karen, Hicks Aaron, Mejchar Deborah, Alonso Carmen, Cooper Anthony, Koenigs Michael R, Grupe Daniel W

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Department of Psychiatry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

出版信息

Am J Community Psychol. 2025 Jul 24. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.70004.

DOI:10.1002/ajcp.70004
PMID:40704539
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12313296/
Abstract

Equitable community-academic research partnerships provide an innovative way to advance health outcomes among criminal legal system-impacted individuals. The extant literature lacks accounts that detail the process for developing such partnerships, particularly in community-based (rather than carceral) settings and with community organizations (rather than system actors). This First-Person Account-co-written by members of a research team consisting of academic researchers and community partners, including formerly incarcerated individuals-details opportunities and challenges that emerged through a year-long pilot project intended to adapt a mental health intervention for correctional settings. The narrow focus of this project expanded dramatically over the course of the year as team members adapted to working together and realized the potential for the sustained impact of a long-term collaboration. Key elements allowing for successful partnership development included (1) devoting time to building relationships in addition to "doing business"; (2) flexibility regarding the project aims and approach, which allowed for more equitable decision-making; and (3) striving to understand and trust each other's respective expertise, whether based in academic training or lived experiences. Our experiences translate core principles of community-based participatory research into concrete actions and practical examples of how to center the perspective of criminal legal system-impacted individuals.

摘要

公平的社区-学术研究伙伴关系为改善受刑事法律系统影响人群的健康状况提供了一种创新途径。现有文献缺乏对建立此类伙伴关系过程的详细描述,尤其是在基于社区(而非监禁场所)的环境中以及与社区组织(而非系统参与者)合作的情况。这篇第一人称叙述由一个研究团队的成员共同撰写,该团队包括学术研究人员和社区伙伴,其中有曾被监禁的人员,详细介绍了一个为期一年的试点项目中出现的机遇和挑战,该项目旨在调整一种针对惩教环境的心理健康干预措施。随着团队成员适应共同工作并意识到长期合作产生持续影响的潜力,该项目在这一年中重点大幅拓展。促成伙伴关系成功发展的关键要素包括:(1)除了“开展业务”之外,投入时间建立关系;(2)在项目目标和方法上保持灵活性,这有助于实现更公平的决策;(3)努力理解并信任彼此各自的专业知识,无论是基于学术训练还是生活经验。我们的经验将基于社区的参与性研究的核心原则转化为具体行动以及如何以受刑事法律系统影响人群的视角为中心的实际示例。

相似文献

1
The "Best of Both Worlds": Building a community-academic partnership for research with legal system-impacted individuals.“两全其美”:建立社区与学术机构的伙伴关系,以便与受法律系统影响的个人开展研究。
Am J Community Psychol. 2025 Jul 24. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.70004.
2
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.消费者和卫生服务提供者对合作改善卫生服务设计、提供和评估的看法和认知:一项共同制定的定性证据综合研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2.
3
The Lived Experience of Autistic Adults in Employment: A Systematic Search and Synthesis.成年自闭症患者的就业生活经历:系统检索与综述
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):495-509. doi: 10.1089/aut.2022.0114. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Creating the conditions for meaningful and effective PPIE in community-based public health research: learning from a UK-wide lived experience panel.为基于社区的公共卫生研究中开展有意义且有效的公众及患者参与、介入与合作创造条件:借鉴全英生活经历小组的经验
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jul 17;11(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00727-x.
5
'You feel part of something bigger': Stakeholders' experiences of a long-term community-academic participatory research partnership.“你感觉自己是更宏大事物的一部分”:利益相关者对长期社区-学术参与式研究伙伴关系的体验
Autism. 2025 Jun 19:13623613251348485. doi: 10.1177/13623613251348485.
6
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
7
Hail Lifestyle Medicine consensus position statement as a medical specialty: Middle Eastern perspective.欢呼将生活方式医学作为一门医学专业的共识立场声明:中东视角。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 20;13:1455871. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1455871. eCollection 2025.
8
Effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership on health services planning, delivery and evaluation.消费者和医疗服务提供者合作对卫生服务规划、提供和评估的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 15;9(9):CD013373. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013373.pub2.
9
Development and evaluation of a virtual patient-centered outcomes research training program for the cystic fibrosis community.针对囊性纤维化群体的虚拟以患者为中心的结局研究培训项目的开发与评估。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Dec 4;7(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00328-4.
10
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.

引用本文的文献

1
Contemplative practices and the movement toward a more just criminal legal system.沉思修行与迈向更公正刑事司法系统的行动。
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2025 Feb 17. doi: 10.1037/ort0000830.

本文引用的文献

1
A systematic scoping review exploring how people with lived experience have been involved in prison and forensic mental health research.一项系统的范围综述,旨在探讨有过生活经历的人如何参与监狱和法医心理健康研究。
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2024 Feb;34(1):94-114. doi: 10.1002/cbm.2324. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
2
Building Sustainable Organizational and Community Capacity for Research Partnerships: A Decade of Experience.建设可持续的组织和社区研究伙伴关系能力:十年经验。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2021;15(4):553-560. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2021.0045.
3
Patient and public involvement (PPI) in prisons: the involvement of people living in prison in the research process - a systematic scoping review.患者及公众参与(PPI)在监狱中的情况:监狱服刑人员参与研究过程——一项系统性综述。
Health Justice. 2021 Nov 11;9(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s40352-021-00154-6.
4
Secondary care clinicians and staff have a key role in delivering equivalence of care for prisoners: A qualitative study of prisoners' experiences.二级医疗保健临床医生和工作人员在为囚犯提供同等医疗服务方面发挥着关键作用:一项关于囚犯经历的定性研究。
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Jun 21;24:100416. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100416. eCollection 2020 Jul.
5
Exploring health and wellbeing in prison: a peer research approach.探索监狱中的健康与福祉:一种同伴研究方法。
Int J Prison Health. 2019 Sep 11;16(1):78-92. doi: 10.1108/IJPH-03-2019-0019.
6
Developing a Sexual Health Promotion Intervention With Young Men in Prisons: A Rights-Based Participatory Approach.为监狱中的年轻男性开展性健康促进干预措施:一种基于权利的参与式方法。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Apr 29;8(4):e11829. doi: 10.2196/11829.
7
The Praxis of Decoloniality in Researcher Training and Community-Based Data Collection.《研究者培训和基于社区的数据收集的去殖民化实践》
Am J Community Psychol. 2018 Dec;62(3-4):385-395. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12294. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
8
A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting.一种让早产高危的有色人种女性参与研究优先级设定的新方法。
J Vis Exp. 2018 Jan 12(131):56220. doi: 10.3791/56220.
9
Negotiating Ethical Paradoxes in Conducting a Randomized Controlled Trial: Aligning Intervention Science with Participatory Values.在进行随机对照试验时协商伦理悖论:使干预科学与参与性价值观保持一致。
Am J Community Psychol. 2017 Dec;60(3-4):439-449. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12185. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
10
Critical Reflections on Participatory Action Research in a Prison Setting: Toward Occupational Justice.对监狱环境中参与式行动研究的批判性反思:迈向职业正义。
OTJR (Thorofare N J). 2016 Oct;36(4):244-252. doi: 10.1177/1539449216669132. Epub 2016 Sep 21.