Suppr超能文献

门诊护理中数字健康解决方案的服务质量评估:定性项目库开发研究

Service Quality Assessment of Digital Health Solutions in Outpatient Care: Qualitative Item Repository Development Study.

作者信息

Rigo Dominik, Fehring Leonard, Mortsiefer Achim, Meister Sven

机构信息

Health Care Informatics, Faculty of Health, School of Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany.

Department of Gastroenterology, Helios University Hospital Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany.

出版信息

JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jul 24;9:e68276. doi: 10.2196/68276.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The integration of digital health solutions (DHSs) into health care systems has the potential to significantly enhance service delivery and health outcomes. Despite their benefits, the adoption remains slow, especially in outpatient care, and is hindered by various barriers, such as unclear effectiveness and high costs.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to address the uncertainties regarding the cost-benefit ratio of DHSs by developing a comprehensive instrument to evaluate their impact on health care service quality across diverse settings (eg, across different diseases or types of DHSs).

METHODS

We conducted a multistaged rapid review and semistructured, qualitative interviews to identify and adapt existing instruments evaluating the effects of DHSs. The first rapid review screened 4957 records and included 40 relevant papers to identify instruments currently used for DHS assessment after their deployment, yielding a total of 126 reported outcomes. Subsequently, we conducted interviews with 19 health care practitioners across 4 countries to validate and refine the 7 health care service quality dimensions derived from merging the Outpatient Experience Questionnaire (OPEQ), selected after the first rapid review, and Health Care Service Quality (HEALTHQUAL), an established instrument for measuring health care service quality derived from gray literature. On the basis of the results of the interviews, a second rapid review with 35 papers out of 493 screened records was conducted to identify instruments used to measure patient satisfaction, yielding a total of 29 patient satisfaction instruments.

RESULTS

From the first rapid review, OPEQ was selected out of 18 relevant instruments identified among the 126 reported outcomes and combined with HEALTHQUAL. The interviews with health care professionals confirmed the relevance of all 7 health care service quality dimensions derived from OPEQ and HEALTHQUAL. In addition, 4 interviewees mentioned patient satisfaction as a further dimension missing in the framework presented during the interviews. From the subsequent rapid review, the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short Form was selected out of 6 relevant instruments identified among the 29 identified patient satisfaction instruments. By combining HEALTHQUAL, OPEQ, and Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short Form, we derived the Digital Healthcare Service Quality (DigiHEALTHQUAL) questionnaire, which consists of 51 items across 8 dimensions, including accessibility, efficiency, empathy, general satisfaction, degree of improvements of care services, information, safety, and tangibles.

CONCLUSIONS

The DigiHEALTHQUAL questionnaire aims to provide a standardized approach for assessing the impact of DHSs on health care service quality across various use cases, therapeutic areas, and perspectives, facilitating comparison between DHSs and supporting decision makers in resource allocation and implementation decisions. Future research will focus on validating the DigiHEALTHQUAL in real-life settings and further refining it to comprehensively encompass both patient and health care practitioner perspectives.

摘要

背景

将数字健康解决方案(DHSs)整合到医疗保健系统中有潜力显著提高服务提供水平和健康成果。尽管有诸多益处,但其采用速度仍然缓慢,尤其是在门诊护理中,并且受到各种障碍的阻碍,如效果不明确和成本高昂。

目的

本研究旨在通过开发一种综合工具来评估DHSs在不同场景(如不同疾病或DHSs类型)下对医疗保健服务质量的影响,以解决DHSs成本效益比的不确定性。

方法

我们进行了多阶段快速综述和半结构化定性访谈,以识别和调整现有的评估DHSs效果的工具。第一次快速综述筛选了4957条记录,纳入40篇相关论文,以识别DHSs部署后目前用于评估的工具,共产生126个报告结果。随后,我们对4个国家的19名医疗保健从业者进行了访谈,以验证和完善通过合并第一次快速综述后选择的门诊体验问卷(OPEQ)和医疗保健服务质量(HEALTHQUAL)(一种从灰色文献中得出的用于衡量医疗保健服务质量的既定工具)得出的7个医疗保健服务质量维度。根据访谈结果,对493条筛选记录中的35篇论文进行了第二次快速综述,以识别用于测量患者满意度的工具,共产生29个患者满意度工具。

结果

从第一次快速综述中,在126个报告结果中确定的18个相关工具中选择了OPEQ,并与HEALTHQUAL相结合。对医疗保健专业人员的访谈证实了从OPEQ和HEALTHQUAL得出的所有7个医疗保健服务质量维度的相关性。此外,4名受访者提到患者满意度是访谈中提出的框架中缺失的另一个维度。从随后的快速综述中,在29个确定的患者满意度工具中确定的6个相关工具中选择了患者满意度问卷简表。通过结合HEALTHQUAL、OPEQ和患者满意度问卷简表,我们得出了数字医疗服务质量(DigiHEALTHQUAL)问卷,该问卷由8个维度的51个项目组成,包括可及性、效率、同理心、总体满意度、护理服务改善程度、信息、安全性和有形性。

结论

DigiHEALTHQUAL问卷旨在提供一种标准化方法,用于评估DHSs在各种用例、治疗领域和视角下对医疗保健服务质量的影响,便于不同DHSs之间的比较,并支持决策者进行资源分配和实施决策。未来的研究将集中在现实环境中验证DigiHEALTHQUAL,并进一步完善它以全面涵盖患者和医疗保健从业者的视角。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9315/12332462/1caf9881c138/formative_v9i1e68276_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验