• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Minimal Ablative Margin Quantification Using Hepatic Arterial Versus Portal Venous Phase CT for Colorectal Metastases Segmentation: A Dual-center, Retrospective Analysis.使用肝动脉期与门静脉期CT进行结直肠癌转移灶分割的最小消融切缘定量:一项双中心回顾性分析
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2025 Jul 24. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000001782.
2
Ablative margin quantification using deformable versus rigid image registration in colorectal liver metastasis thermal ablation: a retrospective single-center study.使用可变形与刚性图像配准技术评估结直肠肝转移热消融术的消融边界:一项回顾性单中心研究。
Eur Radiol. 2024 Sep;34(9):5541-5550. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10632-8. Epub 2024 Feb 9.
3
Identification of A0 minimum ablative margins for colorectal liver metastases: multicentre, retrospective study using deformable CT registration and artificial intelligence-based autosegmentation.结直肠肝转移瘤最小消融边界的识别:使用形变 CT 配准和基于人工智能的自动分割的多中心回顾性研究。
Br J Surg. 2024 Aug 30;111(9). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znae165.
4
Three-Dimensional Margin as a Predictor of Local Tumor Progression after Microwave Ablation: Intraprocedural versus 4-8-Week Postablation Assessment.三维边界作为微波消融后局部肿瘤进展的预测指标:术中与消融后 4-8 周评估。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2024 Apr;35(4):523-532.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2024.01.001. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
5
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
6
CT-guided Thermal Ablation of Liver Tumors Using Intraprocedural CT-CT Fusion for Applicator Position and Ablation Completeness Assessment: a Single-Center Comparative Analysis.使用术中CT-CT融合技术进行肝脏肿瘤CT引导热消融的敷贴器位置及消融完整性评估:单中心对比分析
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2025 Jul 10. doi: 10.1007/s00270-025-04111-w.
7
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
8
Computational modeling of microwave ablation of lung tumors: Assessment of model-predictions against post-treatment imaging.肺肿瘤微波消融的计算建模:根据治疗后成像评估模型预测结果
Med Phys. 2025 Jul;52(7):e17897. doi: 10.1002/mp.17897. Epub 2025 May 22.
9
Development and Validation of a Convolutional Neural Network Model to Predict a Pathologic Fracture in the Proximal Femur Using Abdomen and Pelvis CT Images of Patients With Advanced Cancer.利用晚期癌症患者腹部和骨盆 CT 图像建立卷积神经网络模型预测股骨近端病理性骨折的研究
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Nov 1;481(11):2247-2256. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002771. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
10
Intraprocedural Versus Initial Follow-up Minimal Ablative Margin Assessment After Colorectal Liver Metastasis Thermal Ablation: Which One Better Predicts Local Outcomes?结直肠癌肝转移热消融术后术中与初始随访时最小消融边缘评估的比较:哪一种能更好地预测局部疗效?
Invest Radiol. 2024 Apr 1;59(4):314-319. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000001023. Epub 2023 Oct 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Software-based versus visual assessment of the minimal ablative margin in patients with liver tumours undergoing percutaneous thermal ablation (COVER-ALL): a randomised phase 2 trial.基于软件与视觉评估经皮热消融治疗肝肿瘤患者的最小消融边缘(COVER-ALL):一项随机2期试验
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 May;10(5):442-451. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(25)00024-X. Epub 2025 Mar 13.
2
Thermal ablation versus surgical resection of small-size colorectal liver metastases (COLLISION): an international, randomised, controlled, phase 3 non-inferiority trial.小尺寸结直肠癌肝转移灶的热消融与手术切除对比研究(COLLISION):一项国际、随机、对照、3期非劣效性试验
Lancet Oncol. 2025 Feb;26(2):187-199. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00660-0. Epub 2025 Jan 20.
3
Identification of A0 minimum ablative margins for colorectal liver metastases: multicentre, retrospective study using deformable CT registration and artificial intelligence-based autosegmentation.结直肠肝转移瘤最小消融边界的识别:使用形变 CT 配准和基于人工智能的自动分割的多中心回顾性研究。
Br J Surg. 2024 Aug 30;111(9). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znae165.
4
Benign and malignant focal liver lesions displaying rim arterial phase hyperenhancement on CT and MRI.在CT和MRI上表现为边缘动脉期强化的肝脏局灶性良恶性病变。
Insights Imaging. 2024 Jul 18;15(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s13244-024-01756-y.
5
Ablation margin quantification after thermal ablation of malignant liver tumors: How to optimize the procedure? A systematic review of the available evidence.恶性肝肿瘤热消融术后消融边缘的量化:如何优化该操作?对现有证据的系统评价
Eur J Radiol Open. 2023 Jun 27;11:100501. doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2023.100501. eCollection 2023 Dec.
6
Ablative Margins of Colorectal Liver Metastases Using Deformable CT Image Registration and Autosegmentation.使用可变形 CT 图像配准和自动分割技术对结直肠肝转移灶进行消融边界评估。
Radiology. 2023 Apr;307(2):e221373. doi: 10.1148/radiol.221373. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
7
Automated segmentation of colorectal liver metastasis and liver ablation on contrast-enhanced CT images.基于对比增强CT图像的结直肠癌肝转移灶自动分割及肝脏消融
Front Oncol. 2022 Aug 11;12:886517. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.886517. eCollection 2022.
8
3D margin assessment predicts local tumor progression after ablation of colorectal cancer liver metastases.三维边缘评估可预测结直肠癌肝转移消融后局部肿瘤进展。
Int J Hyperthermia. 2022;39(1):880-887. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2022.2055795.
9
3D Quantitative Ablation Margins for Prediction of Ablation Site Recurrence After Stereotactic Image-Guided Microwave Ablation of Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Multicenter Study.3D定量消融边缘用于预测立体定向图像引导下微波消融结直肠癌肝转移灶后消融部位复发:一项多中心研究
Front Oncol. 2021 Nov 15;11:757167. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.757167. eCollection 2021.
10
Imaging of Colorectal Liver Metastasis.结直肠癌肝转移的影像学评估。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 Jan;26(1):245-257. doi: 10.1007/s11605-021-05164-1. Epub 2021 Oct 18.

使用肝动脉期与门静脉期CT进行结直肠癌转移灶分割的最小消融切缘定量:一项双中心回顾性分析

Minimal Ablative Margin Quantification Using Hepatic Arterial Versus Portal Venous Phase CT for Colorectal Metastases Segmentation: A Dual-center, Retrospective Analysis.

作者信息

Siddiqi Noreen S, Lin Yuan-Mao, Marques Silva Jessica Albuquerque, Laimer Gregor, Schullian Peter, Scharll Yannick, Dunker Alexandra M, O'Connor Caleb S, Jones Kyle A, Brock Kristy K, Bale Reto, Odisio Bruno C, Paolucci Iwan

机构信息

Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.

Department of Radiology, Interventional Oncology-Microinvasive Therapy, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

出版信息

J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2025 Jul 24. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000001782.

DOI:10.1097/RCT.0000000000001782
PMID:40705461
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12404250/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the predictive value of minimal ablative margin (MAM) quantification using tumor segmentation on intraprocedural contrast-enhanced hepatic arterial (HAP) versus portal venous phase (PVP) CT on local outcomes following percutaneous thermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM).

METHODS

This dual-center retrospective study included patients undergoing thermal ablation of CRLM with intraprocedural preablation and postablation contrast-enhanced CT imaging between 2009 and 2021. Tumors were segmented in both HAP and PVP CT phases using an artificial intelligence-based auto-segmentation model and reviewed by a trained radiologist. The MAM was quantified using a biomechanical deformable image registration process. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was used to compare the prognostic value for predicting local tumor progression (LTP).

RESULTS

Among 81 patients (60 y±13, 53 men), 151 CRLMs were included. During 29.4 months of median follow-up, LTP was noted in 24/151 (15.9%). Median tumor volumes on HAP and PVP CT were 1.7 mL and 1.2 mL, respectively, with respective median MAMs of 2.3 and 4.0 mm (both P< 0.001). The AUROC for 1-year LTP prediction was 0.78 (95% CI: 0.70-0.85) on HAP and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.78-0.91) on PVP (P= 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

During CT-guided percutaneous thermal ablation, MAM measured based on tumors segmented on PVP images conferred a higher predictive accuracy of ablation outcomes among CRLM patients than those segmented on HAP images, supporting the use of PVP rather than HAP images for segmentation during ablation of CRLMs.

摘要

目的

比较使用肿瘤分割技术对术中对比增强肝动脉期(HAP)与门静脉期(PVP)CT进行最小消融边缘(MAM)定量分析,在经皮热消融结直肠癌肝转移(CRLM)后局部结局方面的预测价值。

方法

这项双中心回顾性研究纳入了2009年至2021年间接受CRLM热消融且术中进行消融前和消融后对比增强CT成像的患者。使用基于人工智能的自动分割模型在HAP和PVP CT期对肿瘤进行分割,并由一名经过培训的放射科医生进行复查。通过生物力学可变形图像配准过程对MAM进行定量分析。采用受试者操作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)来比较预测局部肿瘤进展(LTP)的预后价值。

结果

在81例患者(年龄60岁±13岁,男性53例)中,共纳入151个CRLM。在中位随访29.4个月期间,24/151(15.9%)出现LTP。HAP和PVP CT上肿瘤体积中位数分别为1.7 mL和1.2 mL,相应的MAM中位数分别为2.3 mm和4.0 mm(均P<0.001)。HAP上预测1年LTP的AUROC为0.78(95%CI:0.70 - 0.85),PVP上为0.84(95%CI:0.78 - 0.91)(P = 0.002)。

结论

在CT引导下经皮热消融过程中,基于PVP图像分割的肿瘤测量的MAM在CRLM患者中对消融结局的预测准确性高于基于HAP图像分割的肿瘤,支持在CRLM消融期间使用PVP而非HAP图像进行分割。