Suppr超能文献

Clareon Vivity和PureSee人工晶状体的评估:光学质量、焦深和偏心效应。

Evaluation of Clareon Vivity and PureSee intraocular lenses: optical quality, depth of focus and misalignment effects.

作者信息

Niknahad Ava, Wu Zhiyi, Son Hyeck-Soo, Auffarth Gerd U, Khoramnia Ramin, Łabuz Grzegorz

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, The David J. Apple Center for Vision Research, University of Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.

Eye Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310009, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 24;15(1):26943. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-07970-y.

Abstract

Extended depth of focus (EDoF) intraocular lenses allow cataract and refractive-lens-exchange patients to have improved vision at an intermediate distance. Two EDoF lenses, Clareon Vivity and Tecnis PureSee, were evaluated for optical quality using the OptiSpheric IOL Pro2 according to ISO 11979-2 guidelines and measured using Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) and 1951 USAF resolution test chart at 3.0- and 4.5-mm apertures. The IOLs' tolerance to 0.50 mm decentration and a 5° tilt were tested. The unwanted visual effects were compared using their light distribution at 4.5 mm aperture beyond a polychromatic point spread function center. The two models demonstrated comparable optical qualities at intermediate and far focuses; the predicted visual acuities for the Vivity and PureSee were respectively - 0.04 versus - 0.05logMAR at 0 diopter and 0.05 versus 0.07logMAR at - 1.50 diopters of defocus. Increasing pupil size decreased both lenses' optical quality. While decentration decreased the optical quality of both models, tilt had less of an effect. Both were similar in introducing minimal unwanted side effects through visualizing a halo pattern. The results indicate that these lenses offer a good option for patients interested in EDoF lenses and future clinical studies should contribute further insight into their performance and side effects.

摘要

扩展焦深(EDoF)人工晶状体可使白内障和屈光性晶状体置换患者的中距离视力得到改善。根据ISO 11979-2指南,使用OptiSpheric IOL Pro2对两款EDoF晶状体Clareon Vivity和Tecnis PureSee的光学质量进行了评估,并在3.0毫米和4.5毫米孔径下使用调制传递函数(MTF)和1951年美国空军分辨率测试图进行了测量。测试了这两款人工晶状体对0.50毫米偏心和5°倾斜的耐受性。通过比较它们在4.5毫米孔径下多色点扩散函数中心以外的光分布,对不良视觉效果进行了比较。这两款模型在中焦点和远焦点处表现出相当的光学质量;Vivity和PureSee在0屈光度时的预测视力分别为-0.04和-0.05logMAR,在-1.50屈光度离焦时分别为0.05和0.07logMAR。瞳孔尺寸增大会降低两款晶状体的光学质量。虽然偏心会降低两款模型的光学质量,但倾斜的影响较小。通过观察光晕图案,两者在产生最小不良副作用方面相似。结果表明,对于对EDoF晶状体感兴趣的患者来说,这些晶状体是一个不错的选择,未来的临床研究应能进一步深入了解它们的性能和副作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b389/12290095/751b1bbb1636/41598_2025_7970_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验