• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于预测人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染者失访情况的机器学习模型比较。

Comparison of machine learning models to predict loss to follow-up among people with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV).

作者信息

Ridgway Jessica P, Mason Joseph A, Friedman Eleanor E, Oliwa Tomasz, Flores John, Simon Jodi, Ekong Abbey, Yang Ta-Yun, Schneider John A

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, United States.

Center for Research Informatics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, United States.

出版信息

JAMIA Open. 2025 Jul 24;8(4):ooaf077. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf077. eCollection 2025 Aug.

DOI:10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf077
PMID:40709239
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12289141/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare different machine learning models of loss to follow-up among people with HIV (PWH).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using electronic medical record (EMR) data from 7340 PWH at a federally qualified health center, we developed machine learning models to predict loss to follow-up in HIV care. Unstructured text from clinical notes was analyzed using Bag of Words and Word Embedding natural language processing (NLP) approaches.

RESULTS

A random forest model utilizing structured data and Bag of Words (area under the receiver operating curve [AUC], 0.787; 95% CI, 0.776-0.798) outperformed a random forest model utilizing structured data alone (AUC, 0.753; 95% CI, 0.741-0.765), as well as a random forest model using Bag of Words alone (AUC, 0.624; 95% CI, 0.610-0.638).

DISCUSSION

A model using both structured EMR data as well as NLP of unstructured clinical notes had higher performance than models using structured EMR data alone or NLP alone in predicting loss to follow-up from HIV care.

摘要

目的

比较感染人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)者(PWH)失访的不同机器学习模型。

材料与方法

利用一家联邦合格健康中心7340名PWH的电子病历(EMR)数据,我们开发了机器学习模型来预测HIV治疗中的失访情况。使用词袋法和词嵌入自然语言处理(NLP)方法分析临床记录中的非结构化文本。

结果

利用结构化数据和词袋法的随机森林模型(受试者操作特征曲线下面积[AUC],0.787;95%可信区间[CI],0.776 - 0.798)优于仅利用结构化数据的随机森林模型(AUC,0.753;95% CI,0.741 - 0.765),以及仅使用词袋法的随机森林模型(AUC,0.624;95% CI,0.610 - 0.638)。

讨论

在预测HIV治疗失访方面,使用结构化EMR数据以及非结构化临床记录的NLP的模型比仅使用结构化EMR数据或仅使用NLP的模型具有更高的性能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f62e/12289141/8d4af84d2173/ooaf077f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f62e/12289141/8d4af84d2173/ooaf077f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f62e/12289141/8d4af84d2173/ooaf077f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of machine learning models to predict loss to follow-up among people with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV).用于预测人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染者失访情况的机器学习模型比较。
JAMIA Open. 2025 Jul 24;8(4):ooaf077. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf077. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
3
Comparing Natural Language Processing and Structured Medical Data to Develop a Computable Phenotype for Patients Hospitalized Due to COVID-19: Retrospective Analysis.比较自然语言处理和结构化医学数据以开发COVID-19住院患者的可计算表型:回顾性分析
JMIR Med Inform. 2023 Aug 22;11:e46267. doi: 10.2196/46267.
4
Identifying Functional Status Impairment in People Living With Dementia Through Natural Language Processing of Clinical Documents: Cross-Sectional Study.通过对临床文档的自然语言处理识别痴呆患者的功能状态障碍:横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Feb 13;26:e47739. doi: 10.2196/47739.
5
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
6
Identifying Asthma-Related Symptoms From Electronic Health Records Using a Hybrid Natural Language Processing Approach Within a Large Integrated Health Care System: Retrospective Study.在大型综合医疗保健系统中使用混合自然语言处理方法从电子健康记录中识别哮喘相关症状:回顾性研究
JMIR AI. 2025 May 2;4:e69132. doi: 10.2196/69132.
7
Predicting Fatal Drug Poisoning Among People Living with HIV-HCV Co-Infection.预测艾滋病毒-丙型肝炎病毒合并感染人群中的致命药物中毒情况。
Can Liver J. 2025 Mar 12;8(2):295-308. doi: 10.3138/canlivj-2024-0060. eCollection 2025 May.
8
Using Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning to classify the status of kidney allograft in Electronic Medical Records written in Spanish.使用自然语言处理和机器学习对西班牙语电子病历中同种异体肾移植的状态进行分类。
PLoS One. 2025 May 8;20(5):e0322587. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322587. eCollection 2025.
9
Identifying Diabetes Related-Complications in a Real-World Free-Text Electronic Medical Records in Hebrew Using Natural Language Processing Techniques.使用自然语言处理技术在真实世界的希伯来语自由文本电子病历中识别糖尿病相关并发症。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Jan 30:19322968241228555. doi: 10.1177/19322968241228555.
10
Predicting 30-Day Postoperative Mortality and American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Using Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models: Development and Validation Study.使用检索增强大语言模型预测术后30天死亡率和美国麻醉医师协会身体状况:开发与验证研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 3;27:e75052. doi: 10.2196/75052.

本文引用的文献

1
Editorial Commentary: Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence Are Valuable Tools yet Dependent on the Data Input.
Arthroscopy. 2025 Jun;41(6):1909-1911. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.09.030. Epub 2024 Sep 24.
2
ChatGPT hallucinating: can it get any more humanlike?ChatGPT产生幻觉:它能变得更像人类吗?
Eur Heart J. 2024 Feb 1;45(5):321-323. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad766.
3
Hallucinations in ChatGPT: A Cautionary Tale for Biomedical Researchers.ChatGPT中的幻觉:给生物医学研究人员的警示故事。
Am J Med. 2023 Nov;136(11):1059-1060. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2023.06.012. Epub 2023 Jun 25.
4
Predictive Modeling of Lapses in Care for People Living with HIV in Chicago: Algorithm Development and Interpretation.预测芝加哥艾滋病毒感染者护理中断:算法开发与解释。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 May 17;9:e43017. doi: 10.2196/43017.
5
Measures of Retention in HIV Care: A Study Within a Review.艾滋病护理留存率的衡量:一项综述中的研究
AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2023 Apr;37(4):192-198. doi: 10.1089/apc.2022.0225. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
6
One size does not fit all: Preferences for HIV care delivery among out-of-care people living with HIV in the Southeastern United States.一刀切并不适用:美国东南部脱离治疗的 HIV 感染者对 HIV 护理服务传递的偏好。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 17;18(1):e0276852. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276852. eCollection 2023.
7
The prevalence of mental health disorders in people with HIV and the effects on the HIV care continuum.艾滋病毒感染者中心理健康障碍的流行情况及其对艾滋病毒护理连续体的影响。
AIDS. 2023 Feb 1;37(2):259-269. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000003420. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
8
Measuring Retention in HIV Care in the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Impact of Telehealth.测量 COVID-19 大流行第一年的艾滋病毒护理保留率:远程医疗的影响。
AIDS Behav. 2023 May;27(5):1403-1408. doi: 10.1007/s10461-022-03875-3. Epub 2022 Oct 4.
9
Multicenter Development and Validation of a Model for Predicting Retention in Care Among People with HIV.多中心开发和验证一种预测艾滋病毒感染者保留在关怀中的模型。
AIDS Behav. 2022 Oct;26(10):3279-3288. doi: 10.1007/s10461-022-03672-y. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
10
Inaccuracies in electronic health records smoking data and a potential approach to address resulting underestimation in determining lung cancer screening eligibility.电子健康记录中吸烟数据的不准确性及解决由此导致的肺癌筛查资格确定中低估问题的潜在方法。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Apr 13;29(5):779-788. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac020.