Suppr超能文献

接受透明矫治器和固定正畸治疗的错牙合畸形患者口腔微生物特征的比较:最新综述

Comparison of Oral Microbial Profile Among Patients Undergoing Clear Aligner and Fixed Orthodontic Therapies for the Treatment of Malocclusions: An Updated Review.

作者信息

Ponton Emilie, Rossouw Paul Emile, Javed Fawad

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Eastman Institute for Oral Health, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14620, USA.

出版信息

Dent J (Basel). 2025 Jul 16;13(7):322. doi: 10.3390/dj13070322.

Abstract

: The present review aims to compare the oral microbial profile (OMP) of patients undergoing fixed orthodontic therapy (OT) versus clear aligner therapy (CAT) for the treatment of malocclusions. : Clinical studies were included. Case-reports/-series, letters to the editor, reviews, perspectives, and expert opinions were excluded. Indexed databases (MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science) were searched up to the end point of May 2025, without time and language barriers. The study was performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The risk of bias (RoB) and quality of evidence were assessed. : Three randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and seven non-RCTs were included. In all RCTs and five non-RCTs, OMP was assessed using subgingival plaque samples. Periodontopathogenic bacteria and Gram-negative anaerobic microbes were more often identified in patients undergoing fixed OT than CAT. The biofilm mass was higher in patients undergoing fixed OT than CAT. In two RCTs, periodontopathogenic bacteria were dominant among patients undergoing fixed OT than CAT. All RCTs and two non-RCTs had a high RoB. The certainty of evidence was "moderate" in 70% of the studies. : Due to a high RoB, variability in study designs, and lack of power analysis, direct comparisons remain limited.

摘要

本综述旨在比较接受固定正畸治疗(OT)与透明矫治器治疗(CAT)的错颌畸形患者的口腔微生物概况(OMP)。纳入临床研究。排除病例报告/系列、给编辑的信、综述、观点和专家意见。检索截至2025年5月底的索引数据库(MEDLINE/PubMed、Embase、Scopus和Web of Science),无时间和语言限制。本研究按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目指南进行。评估偏倚风险(RoB)和证据质量。纳入三项随机临床试验(RCT)和七项非RCT。在所有RCT和五项非RCT中,使用龈下菌斑样本评估OMP。与接受CAT的患者相比,接受固定OT的患者中牙周病原菌和革兰氏阴性厌氧微生物的检出率更高。接受固定OT的患者的生物膜量高于接受CAT的患者。在两项RCT中,接受固定OT的患者中牙周病原菌比接受CAT的患者中更占优势。所有RCT和两项非RCT的RoB都很高。70%的研究中证据的确定性为“中等”。由于RoB高、研究设计的变异性以及缺乏功效分析,直接比较仍然有限。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7918/12293423/592392bd9755/dentistry-13-00322-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验