Reijnders Lucas
IBED (Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics), Faculty of Science, University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1090 GE Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Nanomaterials (Basel). 2025 Jul 14;15(14):1095. doi: 10.3390/nano15141095.
In scientific literature biosynthesis of gold and silver nanoparticles and synthesis of these nanoparticles using small organic molecules such as citrate have been called: 'green'. It has also been often stated that 'green' synthesis of gold and silver nanoparticle is environment(ally) friendly or ecofriendly. The characterization environment(ally) friendly or ecofriendly is commonly comparative. The comparison is between 'green' and 'chemical' synthesis. The few available comparative life cycle assessments addressing the environmental impacts of 'green synthesis' of Ag and Au nanoparticles, if compared with 'chemical' synthesis, strongly suggest that a 'green' synthesis should not be equated with being environment(ally) friendly or ecofriendly. The term 'green' for Au and Ag nanoparticles obtained by 'green' synthesis is a misnomer. There is a case for only using the terms ecofriendly or environment(ally) friendly for nanoparticle synthesis when there is a firm basis for such characterization in comprehensive comparative cradle-to-nanoparticle life cycle assessment, taking into account the uncertainties of outcomes.
在科学文献中,金和银纳米颗粒的生物合成以及使用柠檬酸盐等小分子合成这些纳米颗粒被称为“绿色”。人们也经常说金和银纳米颗粒的“绿色”合成是环境友好型或生态友好型的。环境友好型或生态友好型的特征通常是比较性的。这种比较是在“绿色”合成和“化学”合成之间进行的。少数针对银和金纳米颗粒“绿色合成”环境影响的可用比较生命周期评估表明,如果与“化学”合成相比,“绿色”合成不应等同于环境友好型或生态友好型。通过“绿色”合成获得的金和银纳米颗粒的“绿色”一词是用词不当。只有在全面比较从摇篮到纳米颗粒的生命周期评估中有确定的依据来进行这种表征,并考虑到结果的不确定性时,才应该在纳米颗粒合成中使用生态友好型或环境友好型这样的术语。