Smith Rebecca, Perkins Elizabeth, Pinchbeck Gina, Ireland Joanne
Department of Equine Clinical Science, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, Faculty of Health & Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, Institute of Population Health, Faculty of Health & Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Equine Vet J. 2025 Jul 27. doi: 10.1111/evj.14562.
Poor pain management in horses is a welfare concern. The 'diagnosis' of pain cannot be separated from the broader set of interactions through which it emerges. The interactions that take place during veterinary consultations shape the ways in which, or whether, pain management is discussed.
To understand owners' and veterinarians' decision making in relation to chronic pain and its management.
Qualitative ethnographic study.
Data were collected from four veterinary practices in Great Britain between May 2023 and April 2024. Around 200 h of ethnographic observation was undertaken, including the observation of 47 consultations. Additionally, semi-structured interviews with 18 veterinarians and 25 owners/carers were conducted. Principles of grounded theory were drawn upon throughout the collection and analysis of data.
This study focusses on the veterinary consultation, discussing how the interplay of actors-both human and nonhuman-affected pain diagnosis and treatment decision making. There were four key processes that were common across the consultations observed: 'Establishing the presence of painful issues', 'Searching for the cause', 'The (de)escalation of issues of concern' and 'Targeting the source of pain'. In each consultation, dynamic multi-actor interactions coproduced matters of concern, and these were the 'things' to which peoples' perceptions of pain were related. Pain diagnosis was not a 'matter of fact', but emerged through relational practices. Consultations could move towards a focus on the horse's management, however, other matters of concern could obfuscate discussions about the subjective experience of the horse.
Focus on leisure horse population.
Pain could become a matter of veterinary concern if it emerged through unique contexts and practices. The nature of presentation to the veterinarian as well as the (re)construction of issues affecting the horse through veterinary medical practices could create tensions for pain management. Opportunities to improve practice are highlighted.
马匹疼痛管理不善是一个福利问题。疼痛的“诊断”不能与其产生的更广泛的相互作用分开。兽医咨询过程中发生的互动塑造了疼痛管理讨论的方式或是否进行讨论。
了解马主和兽医在慢性疼痛及其管理方面的决策。
定性人种学研究。
2023年5月至2024年4月期间,从英国的四家兽医诊所收集数据。进行了约200小时的人种学观察,包括观察47次咨询。此外,还对18名兽医和25名马主/护理人员进行了半结构化访谈。在数据收集和分析过程中借鉴了扎根理论的原则。
本研究聚焦于兽医咨询,讨论了人类和非人类参与者的相互作用如何影响疼痛诊断和治疗决策。在所观察的咨询中,有四个关键过程是常见的:“确定存在疼痛问题”、“寻找病因”、“关注问题的(降)升级”和“确定疼痛来源”。在每次咨询中,动态的多参与者互动共同产生了关注的问题,而这些就是人们对疼痛的认知所关联的“事物”。疼痛诊断不是一个“事实问题”,而是通过关系实践产生的。咨询可能会转向关注马匹的管理,然而,其他关注的问题可能会模糊关于马匹主观体验的讨论。
研究对象为休闲用马群体。
如果疼痛通过独特的背景和实践出现,可能会成为兽医关注的问题。向兽医呈现的情况的性质以及通过兽医医疗实践对影响马匹的问题的(再)构建可能会给疼痛管理带来紧张局面。文中强调了改善实践的机会。