Haugvik Severina, Harel Shiraz, Shaw Heather, de Wit Maartje, Toschi Elena, Hennekes Mareille H C L, Skrivarhaug Torild, Dahl-Jørgensen Knut, Stice Eric, Wisting Line
Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Regional Department for Eating Disorders, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Diabet Med. 2025 Oct;42(10):e70108. doi: 10.1111/dme.70108. Epub 2025 Jul 25.
To examine and describe feedback after participation in a novel eating disorder prevention program for young women with type 1 diabetes (Diabetes Body Project) in a multinational randomised controlled trial.
Written feedback from participants (N = 109) and facilitators (N = 19) at four sites (Europe and US) was analysed using descriptive, manifest content analysis. Open-ended questions included motivation for participation, most/less valuable aspects of the program and suggestions for improvement.
"Community" was the most important motivator and most valued aspect, reported by one-third of participants. When asked about less valued aspects of the program, participants and facilitators most frequently reported "none/not sure/everything was valuable" and "nothing" respectively. Suggestions to improve the program common for participants and facilitators were "more creative exercises", specific for participants after "none" was "limit homework/obligations" and specific for facilitators was "more flexibility to move away from the script". The three most frequently perceived barriers for participation reported by participants and facilitators were "requiring personal vulnerability", "time and energy constraints" and the "group setting".
Participants and facilitators expressed overall high satisfaction with the program, specifically the value of T1D community. Additionally, they suggested incorporating more creative exercises. Future research should aim at widespread implementation and addressing barriers to participation.
在一项跨国随机对照试验中,对参与针对1型糖尿病年轻女性的新型饮食失调预防项目(糖尿病身体计划)后的反馈进行研究和描述。
使用描述性的显性内容分析法,对来自四个地点(欧洲和美国)的参与者(N = 109)和协调员(N = 19)的书面反馈进行分析。开放式问题包括参与的动机、该项目最有价值/最无价值的方面以及改进建议。
“社区”是最重要的动机和最受重视的方面,三分之一的参与者报告了这一点。当被问及该项目不太有价值的方面时,参与者和协调员最常分别报告“没有/不确定/一切都有价值”和“没有”。参与者和协调员提出的改进该项目的常见建议是“更多创造性练习”,参与者在回答“没有”之后提出的具体建议是“限制家庭作业/义务”,协调员提出的具体建议是“更灵活地偏离脚本”。参与者和协调员报告的参与的三个最常见障碍是“需要个人暴露弱点”、“时间和精力限制”以及“小组环境”。
参与者和协调员对该项目总体满意度较高,特别是对1型糖尿病社区的价值。此外,他们建议纳入更多创造性练习。未来的研究应旨在广泛实施并解决参与障碍。