Ismair Selina, Dinzinger Antonia, Markova Gabriela, Schropp Jonas, Brisch Karl Heinz, Sperl Wolfgang, Priewasser Beate
Institute for Early Life Care, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 11;16:1582698. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1582698. eCollection 2025.
This study aims to explore how maternal and paternal attachment representations and their reflective functioning (RF), as operationalization of their mentalizing abilities, influence each other's parental sensitivity within a family systems perspective.
Parental sensitivity is crucial for a child's development, and both parental secure attachment and RF are known to enhance sensitive caregiving. However, the impact of one parent's traits and skills on the other's parenting remains unclear.
In a longitudinal, multi-method study of = 40 first-time families, including 40 fathers, mothers and their infants each, we assessed parental attachment during pregnancy using the Adult Attachment Interview (AAI). RF was measured twice, as RF during pregnancy using the RF scale on the AAI, and as RF when infants were 6 months using the RF scale on the Parent Development Interview. Additionally, parental sensitivity was observed using the Emotional Availability Scales. To investigate associations between parental measures, we employed an actor-partner interdependence model.
We found significant associations between attachment representations and general RF in both mothers and fathers, as well as a mediating effect of fathers' parental RF on the relationship between mothers' general RF and paternal sensitivity. Neither fathers' general RF nor parental RF did influence maternal sensitivity.
The findings suggest interdependencies between mothers' and fathers' reflective functioning and sensitivity, supporting family systems theory. However, given limitations such as a small, homogeneous sample and lack of causal inference, these results should be interpreted cautiously. Yet, the results may have important implications for practice, in that they suggest that both parent's attachment representations and the ability to mentalize in the triadic system should be considered in family interventions.
本研究旨在从家庭系统视角探讨母亲和父亲的依恋表征及其反思功能(RF)(作为其心理化能力的操作性定义)如何相互影响对方的父母敏感性。
父母敏感性对孩子的发展至关重要,已知父母的安全依恋和RF均能增强敏感性养育。然而,一方父母的特质和技能对另一方养育方式的影响仍不明确。
在一项对40个初育家庭的纵向多方法研究中,每个家庭包括40位父亲、母亲及其婴儿,我们在孕期使用成人依恋访谈(AAI)评估父母依恋。RF测量两次,一次是在孕期使用AAI上的RF量表测量孕期RF,另一次是在婴儿6个月大时使用父母发展访谈上的RF量表测量RF。此外,使用情感可及性量表观察父母敏感性。为了研究父母测量指标之间的关联,我们采用了actor - partner相互依赖模型。
我们发现母亲和父亲的依恋表征与一般RF之间存在显著关联,并且父亲的父母RF在母亲的一般RF与父亲敏感性之间的关系中起中介作用。父亲的一般RF和父母RF均未影响母亲的敏感性。
研究结果表明母亲和父亲的反思功能与敏感性之间存在相互依赖关系,支持家庭系统理论。然而,鉴于样本量小、同质性高以及缺乏因果推断等局限性,这些结果应谨慎解释。不过,这些结果可能对实践具有重要意义,因为它们表明在家庭干预中应考虑父母双方的依恋表征以及三元系统中的心理化能力。