• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

设计一份有效的问卷:开展调查的一项基本前提。

Crafting an effective questionnaire: An essential prerequisite of engaging surveys.

作者信息

Sharma Hunny, Ruikar Manisha

机构信息

Department of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India.

出版信息

Perspect Clin Res. 2025 Jul-Sep;16(3):118-126. doi: 10.4103/picr.picr_157_24. Epub 2025 Feb 25.

DOI:10.4103/picr.picr_157_24
PMID:40718890
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12288916/
Abstract

Questionnaires play a crucial role in biomedical research, enabling valuable data collection from individuals. However, the effectiveness of a questionnaire depends on its ability to engage respondents and gather accurate information. This manuscript delves into the intricacies of crafting an effective questionnaire, exploring the essential elements that contribute to their success and impact, and highlights the need for well-crafted questionnaires in biomedical research emphasizing the importance of maximizing respondent engagement, obtaining reliable data, enhancing data completeness, minimizing nonresponse rates and bias, and facilitating data analysis. The article further sheds light on the factors influencing questionnaire effectiveness, including clear and concise language, logical flow and structure, relevance and significance, avoidance of double-barreled and leading questions, and using balanced response options and skip questions. This narrative review examines how each factor contributes to questionnaire quality and offers examples to illustrate their importance. Moreover, it emphasizes the significance of investing time and effort in designing effective questionnaires to ensure the validity and success of biomedical research. By understanding the art of engaging surveys, researchers can optimize their data collection processes and enhance the reliability and validity of their findings.

摘要

问卷在生物医学研究中起着至关重要的作用,能够从个体收集有价值的数据。然而,问卷的有效性取决于其吸引受访者并收集准确信息的能力。本手稿深入探讨了设计有效问卷的复杂性,探究了促成其成功和影响的关键要素,并强调了生物医学研究中精心设计问卷的必要性,即强调最大限度提高受访者参与度、获取可靠数据、增强数据完整性、降低无应答率和偏差以及便于数据分析的重要性。文章还进一步阐明了影响问卷有效性的因素,包括清晰简洁的语言、逻辑流程和结构、相关性和重要性、避免双重提问和诱导性问题,以及使用平衡的回答选项和跳答问题。这篇叙述性综述考察了每个因素如何影响问卷质量,并提供示例来说明其重要性。此外,它强调了投入时间和精力设计有效问卷对于确保生物医学研究的有效性和成功的重要意义。通过理解吸引受访者参与调查的技巧,研究人员可以优化其数据收集过程,并提高研究结果的可靠性和有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8964/12288916/d7f98d6fb0d1/PCR-16-118-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8964/12288916/d7f98d6fb0d1/PCR-16-118-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8964/12288916/d7f98d6fb0d1/PCR-16-118-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Crafting an effective questionnaire: An essential prerequisite of engaging surveys.设计一份有效的问卷:开展调查的一项基本前提。
Perspect Clin Res. 2025 Jul-Sep;16(3):118-126. doi: 10.4103/picr.picr_157_24. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
2
Comparison of self-administered survey questionnaire responses collected using mobile apps versus other methods.使用移动应用程序与其他方法收集的自我管理调查问卷回复的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 27;2015(7):MR000042. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000042.pub2.
3
Accreditation through the eyes of nurse managers: an infinite staircase or a phenomenon that evaporates like water.护士长眼中的认证:是无尽的阶梯还是如流水般消逝的现象。
J Health Organ Manag. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2025-0029.
4
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
5
Culturally Responsive Practices Among Speech-Language Pathologists in Saudi Arabia: Knowledge, Skills, Training Experiences and Attitudes.沙特阿拉伯言语语言病理学家的文化响应性实践:知识、技能、培训经历与态度
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025 Jul-Aug;60(4):e70078. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.70078.
6
Stigma Management Strategies of Autistic Social Media Users.自闭症社交媒体用户的污名管理策略
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):273-282. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0095. eCollection 2025 Jun.
7
Short-Term Memory Impairment短期记忆障碍
8
The measurement and monitoring of surgical adverse events.手术不良事件的测量与监测
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(22):1-194. doi: 10.3310/hta5220.
9
Pain Assessment疼痛评估
10
Neonatal Nurses' Understanding of the Factors That Enhance and Hinder Early Communication Between Preterm Infants and Their Parents: A Narrative Inquiry Study.新生儿护士对促进和阻碍早产儿与其父母早期沟通因素的理解:一项叙事探究研究。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025 Jul-Aug;60(4):e70093. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.70093.

本文引用的文献

1
Construct validity of a questionnaire for measuring student engagement in problem-based learning tutorials.用于测量基于问题的学习辅导中学生参与度的问卷的建构效度。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Nov 7;23(1):844. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04820-1.
2
Educator's blueprint: A how-to guide for survey design.教育者蓝图:调查设计操作指南
AEM Educ Train. 2022 Aug 23;6(4):e10796. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10796. eCollection 2022 Aug.
3
Designing and Using Surveys in Nursing Research: A Contemporary Discussion.护理研究中的设计与使用调查:当代讨论。
Clin Nurs Res. 2022 May;31(4):567-570. doi: 10.1177/10547738211064739. Epub 2021 Dec 7.
4
A Student's Guide to the Classification and Operationalization of Variables in the Conceptualization and Design of a Clinical Study: Part 1.临床研究概念化与设计中变量分类及操作化的学生指南:第1部分
Indian J Psychol Med. 2021 Mar;43(2):177-179. doi: 10.1177/0253717621994334. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
5
Practical Guidelines to Develop and Evaluate a Questionnaire.制定和评估调查问卷的实用指南。
Indian Dermatol Online J. 2021 Mar 2;12(2):266-275. doi: 10.4103/idoj.IDOJ_674_20. eCollection 2021 Mar-Apr.
6
Acquiring data in medical research: A research primer for low- and middle-income countries.医学研究中的数据获取:低收入和中等收入国家研究入门指南
Afr J Emerg Med. 2020;10(Suppl 2):S135-S139. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2020.09.009. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
7
Conducting survey research: Part 1: Use of instruments and permissions: What you need to know.
Nurs Health Sci. 2021 Jun;23(2):297-299. doi: 10.1111/nhs.12674. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
8
A randomised online experimental study to compare responses to brief and extended surveys of health-related quality of life and psychosocial outcomes among women with breast cancer.一项随机在线实验研究,旨在比较乳腺癌女性对健康相关生活质量和心理社会结局简短和扩展调查的反应。
Qual Life Res. 2021 Feb;30(2):407-423. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02651-x. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
9
Maximising engagement and participation of intellectual disability staff in research: Insights from conducting a UK-wide survey.最大限度地提高智障员工在研究中的参与度:来自英国范围内调查的见解。
J Intellect Disabil. 2021 Dec;25(4):554-566. doi: 10.1177/1744629520924141. Epub 2020 May 12.
10
Content Validation through Expert Judgement of an Instrument on the Nutritional Knowledge, Beliefs, and Habits of Pregnant Women.内容验证通过专家判断仪器的孕妇营养知识、信念和习惯。
Nutrients. 2020 Apr 18;12(4):1136. doi: 10.3390/nu12041136.