Prigerson Holly G, Maciejewski Paul K
Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine.
Cornell Center for Research on End-of-Life Care, New York City, NY.
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2025 Jul 1;213(7):159-163. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000001838. Epub 2025 Jul 28.
The purpose of this article is to provide conceptual, technical, and practical explanations for why a single instrument can serve as a multi-purpose measure of grief. Our thesis is based on a conceptualization of Prolonged Grief Disorder (PGD) as persistent, intense grief. We show how grief severity (i.e., a dimensional component) and persistence of intense grief based on the amount of time that has elapsed since the death (i.e., a temporal component) permit a reliable and accurate method for distinguishing pathological grief (i.e., PGD) from nonpathological grief. In principle, any instrument that assesses these basic dimensional and temporal aspects of grief adequately will suffice to assess grief and PGD. Psychiatric measurement tools can be adapted to fit essentially all applications aimed at assessing grief, both pathological and not.
本文旨在对为何单一工具可作为悲伤的多用途测量方法提供概念性、技术性和实用性解释。我们的论点基于将持续性悲伤障碍(PGD)概念化为持续且强烈的悲伤。我们展示了悲伤严重程度(即一个维度成分)以及基于自死亡后经过时间的强烈悲伤的持续性(即一个时间成分)如何允许一种可靠且准确的方法来区分病理性悲伤(即PGD)与非病理性悲伤。原则上,任何能充分评估悲伤这些基本维度和时间方面的工具都足以评估悲伤和PGD。精神科测量工具可进行调整以适应基本上所有旨在评估悲伤的应用,无论病理性与否。