• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于AMFormer的事故责任归因框架:基于交通事故特征的可解释分析

AMFormer-based framework for accident responsibility attribution: Interpretable analysis with traffic accident features.

作者信息

Wang Yahui, Liang Zhoushuo, He Yue, Wu Jiahao, Tian Pengfei, Ling Zhicheng

机构信息

School of Medical Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China.

School of Computer Science, South-Central Minzu University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Jul 28;20(7):e0329107. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329107. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0329107
PMID:40720535
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12303312/
Abstract

Accurately determining responsibility in traffic accidents is crucial for ensuring fairness in law enforcement and optimizing responsibility standards. Traditional methods predominantly rely on subjective judgments, such as eyewitness testimonies and police investigations, which can introduce biases and lack objectivity. To address these limitations, we propose the AMFormer(Arithmetic Feature Interaction Transformer) framework-a deep learning model designed for robust and interpretable traffic accident responsibility prediction. By capturing complex interactions among key factors through spatiotemporal feature modeling, this framework facilitates precise multi-label classification of accident responsibility. Furthermore, we employ SHAP (SHapley Additive Interpretation) analysis to improve transparency by identifying the most influential features in attribution of responsibility, and provide an in-depth analysis of key features and how they combine to significantly influence attribution of responsibility. Experiments conducted on real-world datasets demonstrate that AMFormer outperforms both other deep learning models and traditional approaches, achieving an accuracy of 93.46% and an F1-Score of 93%. This framework not only enhances the credibility of traffic accident responsibility attribution but also establishes a foundation for future research into autonomous vehicle responsibility.

摘要

准确判定交通事故责任对于确保执法公正和优化责任标准至关重要。传统方法主要依赖主观判断,如目击者证词和警方调查,这可能会引入偏差且缺乏客观性。为解决这些局限性,我们提出了AMFormer(算术特征交互变换器)框架——一种为稳健且可解释的交通事故责任预测而设计的深度学习模型。通过时空特征建模捕捉关键因素之间的复杂交互,该框架有助于对事故责任进行精确的多标签分类。此外,我们采用SHAP(Shapley值加法解释)分析,通过识别责任归因中最具影响力的特征来提高透明度,并对关键特征及其如何结合以显著影响责任归因进行深入分析。在真实世界数据集上进行的实验表明,AMFormer优于其他深度学习模型和传统方法,准确率达到93.46%,F1分数达到93%。该框架不仅提高了交通事故责任归因的可信度,还为未来自动驾驶车辆责任研究奠定了基础。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f145/12303312/736aa554b372/pone.0329107.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f145/12303312/21f7c8897ad1/pone.0329107.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f145/12303312/6c221d882eac/pone.0329107.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f145/12303312/6075079985e6/pone.0329107.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f145/12303312/ef32f328ff8b/pone.0329107.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f145/12303312/29f4e50f846b/pone.0329107.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f145/12303312/ac78cfb496ea/pone.0329107.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f145/12303312/736aa554b372/pone.0329107.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f145/12303312/21f7c8897ad1/pone.0329107.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f145/12303312/6c221d882eac/pone.0329107.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f145/12303312/6075079985e6/pone.0329107.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f145/12303312/ef32f328ff8b/pone.0329107.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f145/12303312/29f4e50f846b/pone.0329107.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f145/12303312/ac78cfb496ea/pone.0329107.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f145/12303312/736aa554b372/pone.0329107.g007.jpg

相似文献

1
AMFormer-based framework for accident responsibility attribution: Interpretable analysis with traffic accident features.基于AMFormer的事故责任归因框架:基于交通事故特征的可解释分析
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 28;20(7):e0329107. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329107. eCollection 2025.
2
Short-Term Memory Impairment短期记忆障碍
3
A Responsible Framework for Assessing, Selecting, and Explaining Machine Learning Models in Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes Among People With Type 2 Diabetes: Methodology and Validation Study.用于评估、选择和解释2型糖尿病患者心血管疾病结局机器学习模型的责任框架:方法与验证研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 Jun 27;13:e66200. doi: 10.2196/66200.
4
Vision screening of older drivers for preventing road traffic injuries and fatalities.对老年驾驶员进行视力筛查以预防道路交通伤害和死亡。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 21;2014(2):CD006252. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006252.pub4.
5
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
6
Predicting errors in accident hotspots and investigating satiotemporal, weather, and behavioral factors using interpretable machine learning: An analysis of telematics big data.使用可解释机器学习预测事故热点中的错误并调查时空、天气和行为因素:对远程信息处理大数据的分析
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 8;20(7):e0326483. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326483. eCollection 2025.
7
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
8
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
9
Idiopathic (Genetic) Generalized Epilepsy特发性(遗传性)全身性癫痫
10
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.

本文引用的文献

1
An interpretable stacking ensemble learning model for visual-manual distraction level classification for in-vehicle interactions.
Accid Anal Prev. 2025 Sep;220:108150. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2025.108150. Epub 2025 Jun 27.
2
Prevalence of road traffic injuries in South East and South Asian region - A systematic review.东南亚和南亚地区道路交通伤害的患病率——一项系统评价
J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2023 Apr-Jun;14(2):214-223. doi: 10.25259/JNRP_25_2022. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
3
Are There Any Differences in Road Traffic Injury Outcomes between Older and Younger Adults? Setting the Grounds for Posttraumatic Senior Personal Injury Assessment Guidelines.老年人和年轻人在道路交通伤害结果上有差异吗?为创伤后老年人人身伤害评估指南奠定基础。
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 17;12(6):2353. doi: 10.3390/jcm12062353.
4
Privacy Preserving Image Encryption with Optimal Deep Transfer Learning Based Accident Severity Classification Model.基于最优深度迁移学习的隐私保护图像加密与事故严重程度分类模型。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jan 3;23(1):519. doi: 10.3390/s23010519.
5
Accident Liability Determination of Autonomous Driving Systems Based on Artificial Intelligence Technology and Its Impact on Public Mental Health.基于人工智能技术的自动驾驶系统事故责任认定及其对公众心理健康的影响。
J Environ Public Health. 2022 Aug 31;2022:2671968. doi: 10.1155/2022/2671968. eCollection 2022.
6
The Effects of Personality and Attitude on Risky Driving Behavior Among Public van Drivers: Hierarchical Modeling.个性与态度对公共货车司机危险驾驶行为的影响:分层建模
Saf Health Work. 2022 Jun;13(2):187-191. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2022.03.005. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
7
Are there sex differences in crash and crash-related injury between men and women? A 13-year cohort study of young drivers in Australia.男性和女性在撞车及与撞车相关的伤害方面是否存在性别差异?一项对澳大利亚年轻驾驶员的13年队列研究。
SSM Popul Health. 2021 May 12;14:100816. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100816. eCollection 2021 Jun.
8
Cannabis and crash risk among older drivers.老年人驾车与撞车风险:大麻的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Mar;152:105987. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.105987. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
9
Predicting On-Road Driving Skills, Fitness to Drive, and Prospective Accident Risk in Older Drivers and Drivers with Mild Cognitive Impairment: The Importance of Non-Cognitive Risk Factors.预测老年驾驶员和轻度认知障碍驾驶员的道路驾驶技能、驾驶适应性和未来事故风险:非认知风险因素的重要性。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2021;79(1):401-414. doi: 10.3233/JAD-200943.
10
Factors associated with driver injury severity of lane changing crashes involving younger and older drivers.与年轻和年长驾驶员变道事故驾驶员受伤严重程度相关的因素。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Jan;149:105867. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105867. Epub 2020 Nov 14.