• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成年人的语义变化并非主要是一种代际现象。

Semantic change in adults is not primarily a generational phenomenon.

作者信息

Kamath Gaurav, Yang Michelle, Reddy Siva, Sonderegger Morgan, Card Dallas

机构信息

Department of Linguistics, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 1A7, Canada.

Mila-Quebec AI Institute, Montreal, QC H2S 3H1, Canada.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Aug 5;122(31):e2426815122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2426815122. Epub 2025 Jul 28.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.2426815122
PMID:40720652
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12337318/
Abstract

A central question in the study of language change is whether or not such change is generational. If a language changes over time generation-by-generation, the process looks as follows: New generations of speakers introduce innovations, while older speakers conserve their usage patterns, and the language changes as new generations replace older ones. At the opposite extreme, language change could be a zeitgeist phenomenon, in which changes are universally adopted by speakers simultaneously, regardless of age or generational cohort. This paper asks this question in the context of word meaning change. We analyze meaning change in over 100 words across more than 7.9 million U.S. congressional speeches, to observe whether, when a word sense rises or falls in prominence, adult speakers from different generations uniformly adopt it, or those from older generations conserve their prior usage. Using language model-based word sense induction methods, we identify different senses of each word, and then model the prevalence of each of these word senses as a function of time and speaker age. We find that most words show a small but statistically significant effect of speaker age; across almost 140 y of Congress, older speakers typically take longer than younger speakers to follow changes in word usage, but nevertheless do so within a few years. Our findings indicate that despite minor age-based differences, word meaning change among mature speakers is likely not a generational process, but rather a zeitgeist process, in which older adult speakers can readily adopt new word usage patterns.

摘要

语言变化研究中的一个核心问题是这种变化是否具有代际性。如果一种语言随着时间代代相传地发生变化,其过程如下:新一代的使用者引入创新,而年长的使用者保留他们的使用模式,随着新一代取代老一代,语言也随之改变。与之相反的极端情况是,语言变化可能是一种时代精神现象,即无论年龄或代际群体如何,使用者会同时普遍采用这些变化。本文在词义变化的背景下探讨这个问题。我们分析了超过790万份美国国会演讲中100多个单词的意义变化,以观察当一个词义的突出程度上升或下降时,不同代的成年使用者是一致采用它,还是老一辈使用者保留他们先前的用法。使用基于语言模型的词义归纳方法,我们识别出每个单词的不同词义,然后将这些词义的流行程度建模为时间和使用者年龄的函数。我们发现,大多数单词显示出使用者年龄的微小但具有统计学意义的影响;在近140年的国会历史中,年长的使用者通常比年轻的使用者需要更长时间来跟上词汇用法的变化,但最终也会在几年内做到。我们的研究结果表明,尽管存在基于年龄的微小差异,但成熟使用者之间的词义变化可能不是一个代际过程,而是一个时代精神过程,在这个过程中,年长的成年使用者可以很容易地采用新的词汇使用模式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0eae/12337318/b2133b459053/pnas.2426815122fig06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0eae/12337318/07dc9c53100c/pnas.2426815122fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0eae/12337318/a7eaefef4db7/pnas.2426815122fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0eae/12337318/0d32e4e84017/pnas.2426815122fig03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0eae/12337318/cccd896266cf/pnas.2426815122fig04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0eae/12337318/09a93344a58b/pnas.2426815122fig05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0eae/12337318/b2133b459053/pnas.2426815122fig06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0eae/12337318/07dc9c53100c/pnas.2426815122fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0eae/12337318/a7eaefef4db7/pnas.2426815122fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0eae/12337318/0d32e4e84017/pnas.2426815122fig03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0eae/12337318/cccd896266cf/pnas.2426815122fig04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0eae/12337318/09a93344a58b/pnas.2426815122fig05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0eae/12337318/b2133b459053/pnas.2426815122fig06.jpg

相似文献

1
Semantic change in adults is not primarily a generational phenomenon.成年人的语义变化并非主要是一种代际现象。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Aug 5;122(31):e2426815122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2426815122. Epub 2025 Jul 28.
2
Short-Term Memory Impairment短期记忆障碍
3
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
4
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
5
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
6
Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor.择期引产的母婴结局
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2009 Mar(176):1-257.
7
Automated monitoring compared to standard care for the early detection of sepsis in critically ill patients.与标准护理相比,自动监测用于危重症患者脓毒症的早期检测
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 25;6(6):CD012404. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012404.pub2.
8
Idiopathic (Genetic) Generalized Epilepsy特发性(遗传性)全身性癫痫
9
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
10
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗成人慢性疼痛的疼痛管理:一项网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(62):1-155. doi: 10.3310/MKRT2948.

本文引用的文献

1
Stan: A Probabilistic Programming Language.斯坦:一种概率编程语言。
J Stat Softw. 2017;76. doi: 10.18637/jss.v076.i01. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
2
Computational analysis of 140 years of US political speeches reveals more positive but increasingly polarized framing of immigration.对 140 年来美国政治演讲的计算分析显示,移民问题的表述更加积极,但两极分化也日益严重。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Aug 2;119(31):e2120510119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2120510119. Epub 2022 Jul 29.
3
More evidence from over 1.1 million subjects that the critical period for syntax closes in late adolescence.
超过 110 万受试者的更多证据表明,句法的关键期在青春期后期结束。
Cognition. 2021 Sep;214:104706. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104706. Epub 2021 May 27.
4
A Standardized Project Gutenberg Corpus for Statistical Analysis of Natural Language and Quantitative Linguistics.一个用于自然语言统计分析和定量语言学的标准化古登堡计划语料库。
Entropy (Basel). 2020 Jan 20;22(1):126. doi: 10.3390/e22010126.
5
A critical period for second language acquisition: Evidence from 2/3 million English speakers.第二语言习得的关键期:来自 200 万英语使用者的证据。
Cognition. 2018 Aug;177:263-277. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.04.007. Epub 2018 May 2.
6
Cultural Shift or Linguistic Drift? Comparing Two Computational Measures of Semantic Change.文化转变还是语言演变?比较语义变化的两种计算方法。
Proc Conf Empir Methods Nat Lang Process. 2016 Nov;2016:2116-2121. doi: 10.18653/v1/d16-1229.
7
Vocabulary, Grammar, Sex, and Aging.词汇、语法、性别与衰老
Cogn Sci. 2017 May;41(4):950-975. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12367. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
8
When does cognitive functioning peak? The asynchronous rise and fall of different cognitive abilities across the life span.认知功能何时达到顶峰?不同认知能力在整个生命周期中的异步起伏。
Psychol Sci. 2015 Apr;26(4):433-43. doi: 10.1177/0956797614567339. Epub 2015 Mar 13.
9
Diffusion of lexical change in social media.社交媒体中词汇变化的传播
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 19;9(11):e113114. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113114. eCollection 2014.
10
Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books.利用数百万本数字化书籍进行文化的定量分析。
Science. 2011 Jan 14;331(6014):176-82. doi: 10.1126/science.1199644. Epub 2010 Dec 16.