• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

摄影角度对骨盆X线片髋臼指数及中心边缘角变化的量化分析

Quantification of the changes in acetabular index and Center-edge angle of pelvic radiograph induced by photography angles.

作者信息

Xie Kunjie, Lei Wei, Yan Yabo

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Jul 28;26(1):718. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08904-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12891-025-08904-5
PMID:40722076
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12302830/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In regions lacking professional digital imaging equipment, parents sometimes use smartphones to take photos of pelvic X-ray films and transmit them to clinicians via a messaging application for consultation. However, the accuracy of measuring parameters through photos is unknown. Certain factors that affect photograph quality may lead to deviations in pelvic radiographic measurements. This study investigates the impact of photography angles on measurements of the Acetabular Index (AI) and Center-edge Angle (CEA).

METHOD

We collected pelvic radiographs from 50 patients who were suspected of having DDH. We constructed an experimental setup incorporating a tripod and a film viewer, and captured 850 photos across a range of smartphone tilt or rotation angles from - 20° to 20°, with a gradient of 5[Formula: see text]. Photos with zero-degree tilt and rotation were considered standard. Two researchers independently measure the AI and CEA. A one-way ANOVA and Dunnett T3 post-test were used to compare the relationship between photography angle and parameter variances. Simple linear regression was used to quantify the relationship between the two. An independent samples t-test was performed to compare differences in hip parameter changes between DDH and normal individuals.

RESULT

The measurements of the AI and CEA on the photographs captured by smartphones show excellent consistency with those on the radiographic films (ICC ranges from 0.940 to 0.998). The smartphone's high-angle shot, right rotation, and left rotation will cause an increase in bilateral CEA, right AI, and left AI, respectively. Other changes will lead to a decrease in CEA or AI. Linear regression analysis revealed that the right AI increased by approximately 0.09 ° for each 1° increase in right rotation. Conversely, it decreased by 0.09°, 0.06°, or 0.09° for each 1° increase in high-angle shot, low-angle shot, or left rotation, respectively. The right CEA increased by about 0.21° for each 1° in photography tilt and decreased by about 0.08° or 0.13° for each 1° in left or right rotation. The left hip also exhibits a similar pattern. The change in AI caused by smartphone tilt is greater in patients with DDH than in normal individuals.

CONCLUSION

Capturing radiographic photos with a smartphone can serve as a potential alternative for the follow-up and evaluation of DDH. Photography angles can directly affect the measurement of hip parameters. Clinicians must assess the quality of the photographs before providing suggestions. Quantifying the relationship between photography angles and hip parameter variance can assist clinicians in making more comprehensive and accurate assessments in DDH.

摘要

背景

在缺乏专业数字成像设备的地区,家长有时会用智能手机拍摄骨盆X光片,并通过即时通讯应用程序将其发送给临床医生进行咨询。然而,通过照片测量参数的准确性尚不清楚。某些影响照片质量的因素可能导致骨盆影像学测量出现偏差。本研究调查摄影角度对髋臼指数(AI)和中心边缘角(CEA)测量的影响。

方法

我们收集了50例疑似患有发育性髋关节发育不良(DDH)患者的骨盆X光片。我们构建了一个包含三脚架和胶片观察器的实验装置,并在智能手机倾斜或旋转角度从-20°到20°、梯度为5°的范围内拍摄了850张照片。倾斜和旋转角度为零度的照片被视为标准照片。两名研究人员独立测量AI和CEA。采用单因素方差分析和Dunnett T3事后检验来比较摄影角度与参数差异之间的关系。使用简单线性回归来量化两者之间的关系。进行独立样本t检验以比较DDH患者和正常个体髋关节参数变化的差异。

结果

智能手机拍摄的照片上AI和CEA的测量结果与X光片上的测量结果具有极好的一致性(组内相关系数范围为0.940至0.998)。智能手机的高角度拍摄、向右旋转和向左旋转将分别导致双侧CEA、右侧AI和左侧AI增加。其他变化将导致CEA或AI降低。线性回归分析显示,向右旋转每增加1°,右侧AI增加约0.09°。相反,高角度拍摄、低角度拍摄或向左旋转每增加1°,右侧AI分别降低0.09°、0.06°或0.09°。摄影倾斜每增加1°,右侧CEA增加约0.21°,向左或向右旋转每增加1°,右侧CEA分别降低约0.08°或0.13°。左侧髋关节也呈现类似模式。智能手机倾斜导致的AI变化在DDH患者中比在正常个体中更大。

结论

用智能手机拍摄X光照片可作为DDH随访和评估的一种潜在替代方法。摄影角度可直接影响髋关节参数的测量。临床医生在提供建议前必须评估照片质量。量化摄影角度与髋关节参数差异之间的关系可帮助临床医生在DDH中进行更全面准确的评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18c2/12302830/b58888d31d19/12891_2025_8904_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18c2/12302830/bac4442d6df5/12891_2025_8904_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18c2/12302830/f1711e81feae/12891_2025_8904_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18c2/12302830/3c587d9fe1a5/12891_2025_8904_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18c2/12302830/fc1e4164d0b8/12891_2025_8904_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18c2/12302830/5a0c0ffeae36/12891_2025_8904_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18c2/12302830/b58888d31d19/12891_2025_8904_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18c2/12302830/bac4442d6df5/12891_2025_8904_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18c2/12302830/f1711e81feae/12891_2025_8904_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18c2/12302830/3c587d9fe1a5/12891_2025_8904_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18c2/12302830/fc1e4164d0b8/12891_2025_8904_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18c2/12302830/5a0c0ffeae36/12891_2025_8904_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18c2/12302830/b58888d31d19/12891_2025_8904_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Quantification of the changes in acetabular index and Center-edge angle of pelvic radiograph induced by photography angles.摄影角度对骨盆X线片髋臼指数及中心边缘角变化的量化分析
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Jul 28;26(1):718. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08904-5.
2
What Are the Sex-Based Differences of Acetabular Coverage Features in Hip Dysplasia?髋关节发育不良中髋臼覆盖特征的性别差异有哪些?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Nov 1;482(11):1971-1983. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003126. Epub 2024 Jul 12.
3
How Does Radiographic Acetabular Morphology Change Between the Supine and Standing Positions in Asymptomatic Volunteers?无症状志愿者仰卧位和站立位时髋臼的放射学形态变化如何?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1550-1561. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003073. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
4
Is Prior Nonoperative or Operative Treatment of Dysplasia of the Hip Associated With Poorer Results of Periacetabular Osteotomy?髋关节发育不良的术前或术后治疗是否与髋臼周围截骨术的结果较差相关?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Nov 1;482(11):1987-1996. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003150. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
5
Erect Weight-Bearing Pelvic Radiographs are Superior to Supine Radiographs for Diagnosis of Mixed Type Acetabular Retroversion Plus Developmental Dysplasia Hip Deformity.站立负重骨盆X线片在诊断混合型髋臼后倾合并发育性髋关节发育不良畸形方面优于仰卧位X线片。
Arthroscopy. 2025 Jul;41(7):2364-2373. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.10.035. Epub 2024 Nov 6.
6
What Is the Functional Spinopelvic Relationship in Three Dimensions? A CT and EOS Study.三维空间中功能性脊柱骨盆关系是什么?一项CT和EOS研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Mar 28. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003473.
7
Which Acetabular Measurements Most Accurately Differentiate Between Patients and Controls? A Comparative Study.哪些髋臼测量指标能最准确地区分患者和对照者?一项比较研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Feb 1;482(2):259-274. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002768. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
8
Does Periacetabular Osteotomy Change Sagittal Spinopelvic Alignment?髋臼周围截骨术是否改变矢状位脊柱骨盆排列?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1659-1667. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003031. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
9
Is Quantitative Radiographic Measurement of Acetabular Version Reliable in Anteverted and Retroverted Hips?髋臼前倾角和后倾角时髋臼版本的定量放射测量可靠吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2136-2144. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003159. Epub 2024 Jul 12.
10
Radiographically Apparent Acetabular Sourcil Landmarks Are Created by Comparable Regions of the Pelvis With Extraarticular Bone Variably Confounding Estimates of Joint Coverage.影像学上明显的髋臼眉弓标志是由骨盆的可比区域形成的,关节外骨骼的变化会混淆关节覆盖范围的估计。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Feb 1;483(2):343-358. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003268. Epub 2024 Oct 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Modified Center-Edge Angle in Children with Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip.发育性髋关节发育不良患儿的改良中心边缘角
J Imaging. 2024 Dec 27;11(1):3. doi: 10.3390/jimaging11010003.
2
Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH): Etiology, Diagnosis, and Management.发育性髋关节发育不良(DDH):病因、诊断与治疗
Cureus. 2023 Aug 9;15(8):e43207. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43207. eCollection 2023 Aug.
3
Clinical thought-based software for diagnosing developmental dysplasia of the hip on pediatric pelvic radiographs.基于临床思维的软件,用于在儿科骨盆X光片上诊断发育性髋关节发育不良。
Front Pediatr. 2023 Mar 30;11:1080194. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1080194. eCollection 2023.
4
Detection of developmental dysplasia of the hip in X-ray images using deep transfer learning.基于深度迁移学习的 X 射线图像发育性髋关节发育不良检测
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Aug 13;22(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01957-9.
5
Reliability of different smartphones measuring the hallux valgus parameters in a new rapid method: a follow-up study.不同智能手机在新快速测量方法中测量拇外翻参数的可靠性:随访研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Apr 2;23(1):315. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05217-9.
6
What Is the Best Way for Patients to Take Photographs of Medical Images (Radiographs, CT, and MRI) Using a Smartphone?患者使用智能手机拍摄医学影像(X 光片、CT 和 MRI)的最佳方式是什么?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Oct 1;479(10):2228-2235. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001731.
7
Evaluating paediatric orthopaedic teleradiology services at a tertiary care centre.评估三级医疗中心的儿科矫形放射服务。
J Pediatr Orthop B. 2022 Jan 1;31(1):e69-e74. doi: 10.1097/BPB.0000000000000850.
8
Clinical application of artificial intelligence-assisted diagnosis using anteroposterior pelvic radiographs in children with developmental dysplasia of the hip.人工智能辅助前后位骨盆 X 线片在儿童发育性髋关节发育不良中的临床应用。
Bone Joint J. 2020 Nov;102-B(11):1574-1581. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B11.BJJ-2020-0712.R2.
9
Evaluation of Usability, Perception of Usefulness, and Efficiency of an Application in Interpreting Imaging Examinations and Supporting Decision-Making in Orthopedics.评估一款应用程序在解读影像检查和支持骨科决策方面的可用性、实用性感知和效率。
Telemed J E Health. 2021 May;27(5):561-567. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2020.0108. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
10
Reliability and validity of angle measurements using radiograph and smartphone applications: experimental research on protractor.使用X线片和智能手机应用程序进行角度测量的可靠性和有效性:量角器的实验研究
J Phys Ther Sci. 2017 Oct;29(10):1869-1873. doi: 10.1589/jpts.29.1869. Epub 2017 Oct 21.