Yuzuncu Yil University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Van, Turkey.
Yuzuncu Yil University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pathology, Van, Turkey.
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2018 Mar;21:416-420. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2018.02.018. Epub 2018 Feb 24.
Although antimicrobial efficacy of photodynamic therapy has been studied several times, there is no study investigating its efficacy on pericoronitis. This study aimed to determine whether antimicrobial photodynamic therapy combined with antibiotic therapy is clinically and histologically superior to antibiotic therapy alone in pericoronitis treatment.
Patients (n = 40) with pericoronitis were divided into two groups (20 patients for each) to receive either antibiotic + indocyanine green + 810 nm wavelength diode laser (antimicrobial photodynamic therapy group) or antibiotic alone. Initial biopsy samples were obtained from the affected tissue of the patients at their first presentation to the clinic before any intervention. The second biopsy samples were obtained on the 3rd day of treatment in both groups from the tissue part not biopsied before; tooth extraction was then performed. All tissue samples were histologically examined to assess inflammatory cell response. Patients' pain (using Visual Analogue Scale) and lymphadenopathy (presence or absence) were clinically evaluated in the first 3 days and on the 7th day of treatment.
In the antimicrobial photodynamic therapy group, 100% improvement was achieved regarding pain and lymphadenopathy at the end of the 7th day. Comparison of the inflammatory cell scores of the 2nd biopsy samples between the antibiotic alone and antimicrobial photodynamic therapy groups revealed a significant difference in favor of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy group.
Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy combined with antibiotic therapy for pericoronitis treatment was found to be more successful as compared with the antibiotic therapy alone regarding clinical and histological outcomes.
尽管光动力疗法的抗菌效果已经多次被研究,但目前尚无研究调查其在冠周炎治疗中的疗效。本研究旨在确定抗菌光动力疗法联合抗生素治疗在冠周炎治疗中的临床和组织学效果是否优于单独使用抗生素治疗。
将 40 名患有冠周炎的患者分为两组(每组 20 名患者),分别接受抗生素+吲哚菁绿+810nm 波长二极管激光(抗菌光动力疗法组)或单独使用抗生素治疗。在首次就诊时,在任何干预措施之前,从患者受影响的组织中获取初始活检样本。在两组的第 3 天,从之前未进行活检的组织部分获取第二次活检样本,然后进行拔牙。所有组织样本均进行组织学检查以评估炎症细胞反应。在治疗的前 3 天和第 7 天,通过视觉模拟量表评估患者的疼痛(疼痛)和淋巴结病(存在或不存在)情况。
在第 7 天结束时,抗菌光动力疗法组在疼痛和淋巴结病方面的改善率达到 100%。比较单独使用抗生素和抗菌光动力疗法组的第二次活检样本的炎症细胞评分显示,抗菌光动力疗法组具有显著优势。
与单独使用抗生素治疗相比,抗菌光动力疗法联合抗生素治疗冠周炎在临床和组织学结果方面更成功。