Smits Eva J C, Wenzel Niklas, de Bruin Anique
Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Department of Educational Research & Development, School of Health Professions Education, Faculty of Health, Medicine, and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, 6211 LK Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jun 25;15(7):861. doi: 10.3390/bs15070861.
Effective break taking during study sessions is crucial for maintaining performance, especially in self-regulated learning settings where students plan their own tasks. However, research on break taking in these contexts is limited. This study investigates the effect of self-regulated, Pomodoro, and Flowtime breaks on subjective study experiences, task completion, and flow. Ninety-four university students participated in an online intervention that provided instruction on how to take breaks in a 2 h authentic study session. In the self-regulated break condition ( = 25), students decided when and how long to take breaks. In the Pomodoro condition ( = 36), students took 5 min breaks after every 25 min of studying. In the Flowtime group ( = 33), participants decided when to take breaks; however, the break duration was determined based on prior study duration. Results showed that Pomodoro breaks led to a faster increase in fatigue, and Pomodoro and Flowtime breaks led to a faster decrease in motivation compared with self-regulated breaks; however, these differences did not result in overall differences in fatigue or motivation levels between conditions. Similarly, no differences were found in productivity levels, task completion, and flow. Future research should further examine these techniques by including variables like personality and mental effort.
在学习期间进行有效的休息对于保持学习表现至关重要,尤其是在学生自行规划任务的自主学习环境中。然而,在这些情境下关于休息的研究有限。本研究调查了自主调节、番茄工作法和基于学习时长的休息方式对主观学习体验、任务完成情况和心流状态的影响。94名大学生参与了一项在线干预,该干预提供了关于如何在2小时的真实学习时段中进行休息的指导。在自主调节休息条件组(n = 25)中,学生自行决定何时休息以及休息多长时间。在番茄工作法条件组(n = 36)中,学生每学习25分钟后休息5分钟。在基于学习时长的休息组(n = 33)中,参与者自行决定何时休息;然而,休息时长是根据之前的学习时长来确定的。结果显示,与自主调节休息相比,番茄工作法的休息方式导致疲劳感上升更快,且番茄工作法和基于学习时长的休息方式导致学习动机下降更快;然而,这些差异并未导致不同条件下疲劳或动机水平的总体差异。同样,在学习效率水平、任务完成情况和心流状态方面未发现差异。未来的研究应通过纳入人格和脑力投入等变量来进一步检验这些方法。