• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Italian Version of the Fundamentals of Care Framework and the Fundamentals of Care Practice Process: A Comprehensive Validation Study.

作者信息

Bagnasco Annamaria, Lusignani Maura, Pagnucci Nicola, Sallai Talita, Catania Gianluca, Napolitano Francesca, Dal Molin Alberto, Mazzoleni Beatrice, Cosmai Simone, Cattani Daniela, Mansi Laura, Montani Doriana, Zavaglio Andreina, Sanvito Paola, Cartabia Chiara, Consolo Letteria, Giuseppe Luca, Zanini Milko, Sasso Loredana

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.

Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

J Adv Nurs. 2025 Jul 28. doi: 10.1111/jan.70099.

DOI:10.1111/jan.70099
PMID:40726058
Abstract

AIMS

To translate, culturally adapt and validate the Italian version of Fundamentals of Care Framework and the Fundamentals of Care Practice Process.

DESIGN

Qualitative tool validation study.

METHODS

The study followed internationally recommended procedures, including forward-backward translation, expert committee review, content validation through cognitive interviews and face validity testing with nurses and nursing students. Data were collected between January and October 2023.

RESULTS

Key terms were culturally and linguistically adapted to enhance clarity and contextual relevance, with changes informed by expert feedback. Content validation confirmed conceptual equivalence, and face validity testing demonstrated that Italian versions were perceived as clear, appropriate and applicable across clinical and educational settings.

CONCLUSION

Cultural adaptation of theoretical frameworks is essential for ensuring their relevance and usability in local contexts. The Italian versions of the Fundamentals of Care Framework and the Fundamentals of Care Practice Process will provide a robust, evidence-based foundation for person-centred care across education, research and clinical practice.

IMPACT

By making these tools accessible in Italian, this study supports the integration of fundamentals of care into national nursing education and practice, promoting international consistency in person-centred care. It lays the groundwork for curriculum reform, clinical implementation and global collaboration in nursing.

REPORTING METHOD

Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) checklist.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

This study did not involve any patient or public contribution.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05177627.

摘要

相似文献

1
Italian Version of the Fundamentals of Care Framework and the Fundamentals of Care Practice Process: A Comprehensive Validation Study.
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Jul 28. doi: 10.1111/jan.70099.
2
Testing a model for person-centred pain management: A systematic review and synthesis guided by the Fundamentals of Care framework.测试以患者为中心的疼痛管理模型:以关怀基本要素框架为指导的系统评价和综合研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2023 Oct;32(19-20):6811-6831. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16770. Epub 2023 May 27.
3
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
4
Experiences of gynecological cancer patients receiving care from specialist nurses: a qualitative systematic review.妇科癌症患者接受专科护士护理的体验:一项定性系统综述。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2017 Aug;15(8):2087-2112. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003126.
5
The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.医疗机构内协作的测量:对测量工具属性的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159.
6
Person-Centred Learning: Enabling Development of Clinical Competence in Nursing Students Following Initial Failure During Clinical Education-A Grounded Theory Study.以患者为中心的学习:在临床教育初期失败后促进护生临床能力发展——一项扎根理论研究
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Jul 15. doi: 10.1111/jan.70080.
7
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
8
Neonatal Nurses' Understanding of the Factors That Enhance and Hinder Early Communication Between Preterm Infants and Their Parents: A Narrative Inquiry Study.新生儿护士对促进和阻碍早产儿与其父母早期沟通因素的理解:一项叙事探究研究。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025 Jul-Aug;60(4):e70093. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.70093.
9
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.消费者和卫生服务提供者对合作改善卫生服务设计、提供和评估的看法和认知:一项共同制定的定性证据综合研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2.
10
Accreditation through the eyes of nurse managers: an infinite staircase or a phenomenon that evaporates like water.护士长眼中的认证:是无尽的阶梯还是如流水般消逝的现象。
J Health Organ Manag. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2025-0029.