• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估突破性感染:Covishield(延迟接种方案)与Covaxin——普通人群中的前瞻性比较分析

Assessing breakthrough infections: Covishield (late schedule) versus Covaxin - A prospective comparative analysis in the general population.

作者信息

Nadda Anuradha, Kapoor Neha, Sharma Sahil, Sharma Nikita, Viswanathan Viyusha T, Soni Anamika, Attri Ritu, Kaur Taranjot, Gupta Nishu, Govil Nikhil, Goel Kapil, Gupta Rahul

机构信息

Department of Community Medicine, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar State Institute of Medical Sciences, Mohali, Punjab, India.

Department of Community and Family Medicine, AIIMS, Bilaspur, Himachal Pradesh, India.

出版信息

J Family Med Prim Care. 2025 Jun;14(6):2307-2312. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1714_24. Epub 2025 Jun 6.

DOI:10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1714_24
PMID:40726698
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12296376/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Breakthrough infections (BTI) threaten the progress of the COVID-19 vaccination program towards pandemic control. To better understand the future vaccine, knowing the BTI in the general population over a while is important.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

The study aimed to compare the BTI among the general population after 1 year of completion of the primary series of Covishield and Covaxin.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This hospital-based prospective study was conducted among the general population beneficiaries of a COVID-19 vaccination center. Clients aged 18 years or above who had completed second vaccine dose were enrolled using systematic random sampling and followed up for 1 year. Using a semi-structured questionnaire, participants were telephonically interviewed within 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months of the second vaccine dose.

RESULTS

Out of 1682 participants who completed the study, 958 (57.0%) and 724 (43.0%) participants received Covaxin and Covishield, respectively. Twenty-nine (3.0%) Covaxin recipients and 25 (3.5%) Covishield recipients reported BTI after 1 year of follow-up with no statistically significant difference among both groups (-0.624). The binary logistic regression model showed that participants with either diabetes or hypertension had 1.22 times the risk of BTI compared to those without comorbidities (aOR: 1.219, CI: 0.072-20.716, -0.891). BTI was not significantly associated with the type of vaccine, sex, employment status, and age category of the participants.

CONCLUSION

The study suggests that regardless of the type of vaccine received, the population will be at the same risk and require similar future containment strategies.

摘要

引言

突破性感染(BTI)威胁着新冠疫苗接种计划在控制疫情方面的进展。为了更好地了解未来的疫苗,了解一段时间内普通人群中的突破性感染情况很重要。

目的

本研究旨在比较接种Covishield和Covaxin首剂系列疫苗1年后普通人群中的突破性感染情况。

材料与方法

这项基于医院的前瞻性研究在一个新冠疫苗接种中心的普通人群受益者中进行。采用系统随机抽样方法,纳入18岁及以上已完成第二剂疫苗接种的受种者,并随访1年。使用半结构化问卷,在第二剂疫苗接种后的1个月、6个月和12个月对参与者进行电话访谈。

结果

在完成研究的1682名参与者中,分别有958名(57.0%)和724名(43.0%)参与者接种了Covaxin和Covishield。随访1年后,29名(3.0%)接种Covaxin的受种者和25名(3.5%)接种Covishield的受种者报告发生了突破性感染,两组之间无统计学显著差异(-0.624)。二元逻辑回归模型显示,患有糖尿病或高血压的参与者发生突破性感染的风险是无合并症者的1.22倍(调整后比值比:1.219;可信区间:0.072 - 20.716;-0.891)。突破性感染与疫苗类型、性别、就业状况和参与者年龄类别均无显著关联。

结论

该研究表明,无论接种何种疫苗,人群面临的风险相同,未来需要采取类似的防控策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ad9/12296376/5c744eefa3ce/JFMPC-14-2307-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ad9/12296376/5c744eefa3ce/JFMPC-14-2307-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ad9/12296376/5c744eefa3ce/JFMPC-14-2307-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing breakthrough infections: Covishield (late schedule) versus Covaxin - A prospective comparative analysis in the general population.评估突破性感染:Covishield(延迟接种方案)与Covaxin——普通人群中的前瞻性比较分析
J Family Med Prim Care. 2025 Jun;14(6):2307-2312. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1714_24. Epub 2025 Jun 6.
2
Persistence of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies for a Year Following SARS-CoV-2 Vaccinations (BBV152 and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19).SARS-CoV-2疫苗(BBV152和ChAdOx1 nCoV-19)接种后一年内SARS-CoV-2抗体的持续存在情况
Indian J Clin Biochem. 2025 Jan;40(1):111-120. doi: 10.1007/s12291-023-01149-w. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
3
COVID-19 Vaccines2019冠状病毒病疫苗
4
Efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines.新型冠状病毒疫苗的有效性和安全性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Dec 7;12(12):CD015477. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015477.
5
Immunogenicity and seroefficacy of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.肺炎球菌结合疫苗的免疫原性和血清效力:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Jul;28(34):1-109. doi: 10.3310/YWHA3079.
6
Vaccines for preventing infections in adults with haematological malignancies.用于预防血液系统恶性肿瘤成人感染的疫苗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 May 21;5(5):CD015530. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015530.pub2.
7
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
8
Risk of thromboembolism in patients with COVID-19 who are using hormonal contraception.COVID-19 患者使用激素避孕的血栓栓塞风险。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 9;1(1):CD014908. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014908.pub2.
9
Safety and immunogenicity of a pentavalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine targeting serogroups A, C, W, Y, and X when co-administered with routine childhood vaccines at ages 9 months and 15 months in Mali: a single-centre, double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 3, non-inferiority trial.在马里,9月龄和15月龄儿童五价脑膜炎球菌结合疫苗(针对A、C、W、Y和X血清群)与常规儿童疫苗同时接种时的安全性和免疫原性:一项单中心、双盲、随机、对照、3期、非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2025 Mar 29;405(10484):1069-1080. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)00046-7. Epub 2025 Mar 11.
10
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.

本文引用的文献

1
Immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines BBV152 (COVAXIN®) and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (COVISHIELD™) in seronegative and seropositive individuals in India: a multicentre, nonrandomised observational study.SARS-CoV-2疫苗BBV152(COVAXIN®)和ChAdOx1 nCoV-19(COVISHIELD™)在印度血清阴性和血清阳性个体中的免疫原性:一项多中心、非随机观察性研究。
Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia. 2024 Feb 27;22:100361. doi: 10.1016/j.lansea.2024.100361. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
Breakthrough infection among healthcare personnel following exposure to COVID-19: Experience after one year of the world's largest vaccination drive.医护人员接触新冠病毒后的突破性感染:全球最大规模疫苗接种运动一年后的经验
J Family Med Prim Care. 2023 Oct;12(10):2328-2337. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_529_23. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
3
Risk of COVID-19 breakthrough infection and hospitalization in individuals with comorbidities.合并症患者 COVID-19 突破性感染和住院的风险。
Vaccine. 2023 Apr 6;41(15):2447-2455. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.02.038. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
4
Prevalence, severity, and risk factor of breakthrough infection after vaccination with either the Covaxin or the Covishield among healthcare workers: A nationwide cross-sectional study.医护人员接种Covaxin或Covishield疫苗后突破性感染的患病率、严重程度及危险因素:一项全国性横断面研究。
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Jul;38(Suppl 1):S66-S78. doi: 10.4103/joacp.joacp_436_21. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
5
Effectiveness of BBV152/Covaxin and AZD1222/Covishield vaccines against severe COVID-19 and B.1.617.2/Delta variant in India, 2021: a multi-centric hospital-based case-control study.印度 2021 年 BBV152/Covaxin 和 AZD1222/Covishield 疫苗对严重 COVID-19 和 B.1.617.2/Delta 变异株的有效性:一项多中心医院病例对照研究。
Int J Infect Dis. 2022 Sep;122:693-702. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.07.033. Epub 2022 Jul 16.
6
Comparison of in-hospital COVID-19 related outcomes between COVISHIELD and COVAXIN recipients.接种COVISHIELD疫苗者与接种COVAXIN疫苗者之间新冠肺炎相关院内结局的比较。
Lung India. 2022 May-Jun;39(3):305-306. doi: 10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_141_22.
7
Clinico-Epidemiological Profile of Breakthrough COVID-19 Infection among Vaccinated Beneficiaries from a COVID-19 Vaccination Centre in Bihar, India.印度比哈尔邦一个 COVID-19 疫苗接种中心接种者突破性 COVID-19 感染的临床流行病学特征。
Ethiop J Health Sci. 2022 Jan;32(1):15-26. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v32i1.3.
8
Immunogenic and reactogenic efficacy of Covaxin and Covishield: a comparative review.科瓦克辛和科维希尔德的免疫原性和反应原性疗效:比较评价。
Immunol Res. 2022 Jun;70(3):289-315. doi: 10.1007/s12026-022-09265-0. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
9
Impact of prior vaccination with Covishield and Covaxin® on mortality among symptomatic COVID-19 patients during the second wave of the pandemic in South India during April and May 2021: a cohort study.2021 年 4 月至 5 月印度南部第二波大流行期间,科维希尔德和科瓦辛®疫苗接种对有症状 COVID-19 患者死亡率的影响:一项队列研究。
Vaccine. 2022 Mar 18;40(13):2107-2113. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.02.023. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
10
SARS-CoV-2 Reinfection Rate and Estimated Effectiveness of the Inactivated Whole Virion Vaccine BBV152 Against Reinfection Among Health Care Workers in New Delhi, India.印度新德里卫生保健工作者中 SARS-CoV-2 再感染率和 BBV152 灭活全病毒疫苗预防再感染的估计效力。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jan 4;5(1):e2142210. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.42210.