• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

苏里南使用国际疾病分类第11版综合死亡证明系统进行死亡报告的数字化转型。

Digital transformation of mortality reporting using an ICD-11 integrated death certificate system in Suriname.

作者信息

Toelsie Jerry, Mendes Richard, Dhanpat Ritesh, Ori Radjesh, Adams Rosmond, van Gool Coen, Alsokhn Carine, Kontio Katri, Ouattara Yafflo

机构信息

Anton de Kom University of Suriname Paramaribo Suriname Anton de Kom University of Suriname, Paramaribo, Suriname.

Ministry of Health Paramaribo Suriname Ministry of Health, Paramaribo, Suriname.

出版信息

Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2025 Jul 28;49:e85. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2025.85. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.26633/RPSP.2025.85
PMID:40727262
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12302431/
Abstract

The Ministry of Health of Suriname has replaced the outdated 1958 paper-based death certificate with an adapted digital version based on the World Health Organization international form of Medical Certificate of Cause of Death, integrated with the International Classification of Diseases 11th Revision (ICD-11) coding tool. This digital system, which comprises a mobile application and a web-based platform, enables direct selection of diagnoses using the ICD-11 codes, including post-coordination (code combinations) and the use of extension codes. Acting as a centralized hub, it allows the Ministry of Health to efficiently extract and analyze mortality data. Training programs have been provided for all medical doctors to ensure effective adoption. This initiative aligns with the Pan American Health Organization's Information Systems for Health 2024-2030 strategy, which emphasizes digital transformation to strengthen health systems in the Americas. It also reflects Suriname's commitment to the 2019 World Health Assembly resolution to adopt ICD-11 as the global standard for cause-of-death reporting. By improving data quality, flow, and accessibility, the system supports timely reporting and reduces workload. Furthermore, it addresses a critical gap, as limited published research exists on the implementation of electronic Medical Certificate of Cause of Death (eMCCD) in the Americas. The system will undergo evaluation after one year to assess its impact and guide further improvements.

摘要

苏里南卫生部已将过时的1958年纸质死亡证明替换为基于世界卫生组织国际死亡原因医学证明表格的适配数字版本,并与国际疾病分类第11次修订版(ICD-11)编码工具相结合。这个数字系统包括一个移动应用程序和一个基于网络的平台,能够使用ICD-11编码直接选择诊断结果,包括后协调(编码组合)和扩展编码的使用。作为一个集中枢纽,它使卫生部能够高效地提取和分析死亡率数据。已为所有医生提供培训项目,以确保有效采用。这一举措符合泛美卫生组织《2024-2030年卫生信息系统战略》,该战略强调数字转型以加强美洲的卫生系统。它还体现了苏里南对2019年世界卫生大会决议的承诺,即采用ICD-11作为死因报告的全球标准。通过提高数据质量、流通性和可及性,该系统支持及时报告并减轻工作量。此外,它填补了一个关键空白,因为关于美洲实施电子死亡原因医学证明(eMCCD)的已发表研究有限。该系统将在一年后接受评估,以评估其影响并指导进一步改进。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f611/12302431/64940b4a01e0/rpsp-49-e85-Figure3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f611/12302431/522c19beb03a/rpsp-49-e85-Figure1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f611/12302431/85182c7b63e7/rpsp-49-e85-Figure2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f611/12302431/64940b4a01e0/rpsp-49-e85-Figure3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f611/12302431/522c19beb03a/rpsp-49-e85-Figure1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f611/12302431/85182c7b63e7/rpsp-49-e85-Figure2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f611/12302431/64940b4a01e0/rpsp-49-e85-Figure3.jpg

相似文献

1
Digital transformation of mortality reporting using an ICD-11 integrated death certificate system in Suriname.苏里南使用国际疾病分类第11版综合死亡证明系统进行死亡报告的数字化转型。
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2025 Jul 28;49:e85. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2025.85. eCollection 2025.
2
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
3
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
4
Community and hospital-based healthcare professionals perceptions of digital advance care planning for palliative and end-of-life care: a latent class analysis.社区和医院的医疗保健专业人员对姑息治疗和临终关怀的数字预立医疗计划的看法:一项潜在类别分析。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun 25:1-22. doi: 10.3310/XCGE3294.
5
Comparison of self-administered survey questionnaire responses collected using mobile apps versus other methods.使用移动应用程序与其他方法收集的自我管理调查问卷回复的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 27;2015(7):MR000042. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000042.pub2.
6
Convalescent plasma for people with COVID-19: a living systematic review.COVID-19 患者恢复期血浆治疗:一项实时系统评价。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 10;5(5):CD013600. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013600.pub6.
7
Convalescent plasma for people with COVID-19: a living systematic review.COVID-19 患者恢复期血浆治疗:一项实时系统评价。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 1;2(2):CD013600. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013600.pub5.
8
Technology-enabled CONTACT tracing in care homes in the COVID-19 pandemic: the CONTACT non-randomised mixed-methods feasibility study.新冠疫情期间养老院中基于技术的接触者追踪:CONTACT非随机混合方法可行性研究
Health Technol Assess. 2025 May;29(24):1-24. doi: 10.3310/UHDN6497.
9
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
10
Factors that impact on the use of mechanical ventilation weaning protocols in critically ill adults and children: a qualitative evidence-synthesis.影响重症成人和儿童机械通气撤机方案使用的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 4;10(10):CD011812. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011812.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Improving completeness & reducing errors in medical certification of cause of death: The impact of electronic mortality software in a tertiary care centre in South India.提高死亡原因医学证明的完整性并减少错误:电子死亡软件在印度南部一家三级护理中心的影响。
Indian J Med Res. 2025 Apr;161(4):420-424. doi: 10.25259/IJMR_1394_2024.
2
Improving medical certification of cause of death in Assiut University Children Hospital: an intervention study.提高艾西尤特大学儿童医院死亡原因医学证明的质量:一项干预研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 29;24(1):1506. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11804-4.
3
eHealth literacy among hospital health care providers: a systematic review.
医院卫生保健提供者的电子健康素养:系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Oct 24;23(1):1144. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10103-8.
4
Provider reported challenges with completing death certificates: A focus group study demonstrating potential sources of error.报告者称完成死亡证明有困难:一项显示潜在错误来源的焦点小组研究。
PLoS One. 2022 May 20;17(5):e0268566. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268566. eCollection 2022.
5
Prevalence and determinants of death registration and certification uptake in Uganda.乌干达死亡登记和认证率的流行情况及决定因素。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 4;17(3):e0264742. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264742. eCollection 2022.
6
Improving quality of medical certification of causes of death in health facilities in Tanzania 2014-2019.提高 2014-2019 年坦桑尼亚医疗机构死亡原因医学证明的质量。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Sep 13;21(Suppl 1):214. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06189-7.
7
Delay in death reporting affects timely monitoring and modeling of the COVID-19 pandemic.死亡报告的延迟影响了对 COVID-19 大流行的及时监测和建模。
Cad Saude Publica. 2021 Aug 13;37(7):e00292320. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00292320. eCollection 2021.
8
Common errors in reporting cause-of-death statement on death certificates: A systematic review and meta-analysis.死亡证明中死因报告常见错误:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Forensic Leg Med. 2021 Aug;82:102220. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2021.102220. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
9
Effectiveness of training interventions to improve quality of medical certification of cause of death: systematic review and meta-analysis.培训干预措施提高死亡原因医学证明质量的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Med. 2020 Dec 11;18(1):384. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01840-2.
10
Improving the quality of cause of death data for public health policy: are all 'garbage' codes equally problematic?提高用于公共卫生政策的死因数据质量:所有“垃圾”编码的问题都一样大吗?
BMC Med. 2020 Mar 9;18(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01525-w.