Clinic of Cardiology, St. Olavs hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, P.O. box 3250, Torgarden, Trondheim, NO-7006, Norway.
Lovisenberg Diaconal University College, Lovisenberggatat 15, Oslo, NO-0456, Norway.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Oct 24;23(1):1144. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10103-8.
eHealth literacy is a key concept in the implementation of eHealth resources. However, most eHealth literacy definitions and frameworks are designed from the perceptive of the individual receiving eHealth care, which do not include health care providers' eHealth literacy or acceptance of delivering eHealth resources.
To identify existing research on eHealth literacy domains and measurements and identify eHealth literacy scores and associated factors among hospital health care providers.
This systematic review was reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 checklist. A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, Cinahl, Embase, Scopus, PEDro, AMED and Web of Science. Quantitative studies assessing eHealth literacy with original research, targeting hospital health care providers were included. Three eHealth literacy domains based on the eHealth literacy framework were defined a priori; (1) Individual eHealth literacy, (2) Interaction with the eHealth system, and (3) Access to the system. Pairs of authors independently assessed eligibility, appraised methodological quality and extracted data.
Fourteen publications, of which twelve publications were conducted in non-Western countries, were included. In total, 3,666 health care providers within eleven different professions were included, with nurses being the largest group. Nine of the included studies used the eHealth literacy scale (eHEALS) to measure eHealth literacy, representing the domain of individual eHealth literacy. A minority of the studies covered domains such as interaction with the eHealth system and access to the system. The mean eHEALS score in the studies ranged from 27.8 to 31.7 (8-40), indicating a higher eHealth literacy. One study reported desirable eHealth literacy based on the Digital Health Literacy Instrument. Another study reported a relatively high score on the Staff eHealth literacy questionnaire. eHealth literacy was associated with socio-demographic factors, experience of technology, health behaviour and work-related factors.
Health care providers have good individual eHealth literacy. However, more research is needed on the eHealth literacy domains dependent on interaction with the eHealth system and access to the system. Furthermore, most studies were conducted in Eastern and Central-Africa, and more research is thus needed in a Western context.
PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42022363039).
电子健康素养是实施电子健康资源的关键概念。然而,大多数电子健康素养定义和框架都是从接受电子健康护理的个体角度设计的,其中不包括医疗保健提供者的电子健康素养或接受提供电子健康资源。
确定现有的电子健康素养领域和测量研究,并确定医院医疗保健提供者的电子健康素养得分和相关因素。
本系统评价按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)2020 清单进行报告。对 MEDLINE、Cinahl、Embase、Scopus、PEDro、AMED 和 Web of Science 进行了系统文献检索。纳入了针对医院医疗保健提供者的具有原始研究的评估电子健康素养的定量研究。基于电子健康素养框架,预先定义了三个电子健康素养领域;(1)个体电子健康素养,(2)与电子健康系统的交互,和(3)系统访问。由两名作者独立评估资格、评估方法学质量并提取数据。
纳入了 14 篇出版物,其中 12 篇出版物来自非西方国家。总共纳入了 11 个不同专业的 3666 名医疗保健提供者,其中护士是最大的群体。纳入的 9 项研究使用电子健康素养量表(eHEALS)来衡量电子健康素养,代表个体电子健康素养领域。少数研究涵盖了与电子健康系统交互和系统访问等领域。研究中的平均 eHEALS 得分范围为 27.8 至 31.7(8-40),表明电子健康素养较高。一项研究根据数字健康素养工具报告了理想的电子健康素养。另一项研究报告了员工电子健康素养问卷的相对较高分数。电子健康素养与社会人口统计学因素、技术经验、健康行为和工作相关因素有关。
医疗保健提供者具有良好的个体电子健康素养。然而,需要更多关于依赖于与电子健康系统交互和访问系统的电子健康素养领域的研究。此外,大多数研究都在东非和中非进行,因此在西方背景下需要更多的研究。
PROSPERO 国际前瞻性系统评价注册(CRD42022363039)。