• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

了解斯洛文尼亚初级医疗保健中(不)公开性取向和性别认同的情况:来自LGBT+群体和全科医生的观点。

Understanding (non)disclosure of sexual orientation and gender identity in Slovenian primary healthcare: Perspectives from LGBT+ individuals and general practitioners.

作者信息

Jerala Nina, Petek Davorina

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, University Psychiatric Clinic Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Department of Family Medicine, University Psychiatric Clinic Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

出版信息

Eur J Gen Pract. 2025 Dec;31(1):2536236. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2025.2536236. Epub 2025 Jul 29.

DOI:10.1080/13814788.2025.2536236
PMID:40728745
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Disclosure ('coming out') is an ongoing process for LGBT+ individuals, impacting various aspects of their lives. While research underscores the importance of disclosure for the health and well-being of LGBT+ people, concerns about stigma and discrimination often lead to non-disclosure, affecting healthcare access and outcomes. In Slovenia, where general practitioners (GPs) play a pivotal role in healthcare, understanding the dynamics of disclosure within primary healthcare settings is crucial.

METHODS

This qualitative study utilised an online survey with open-ended questions to explore the experiences and expectations of both LGBT+ individuals and GPs regarding disclosure. Thematic analysis was employed to identify key themes and subthemes from the data collected between October and December 2021.

RESULTS

Among 214 LGBT+ participants and 28 GPs, four main themes emerged: the necessity and relevance of disclosure; fear, insecurity, or neutrality towards non-disclosure; characteristics and actions of GPs helpful for disclosure; and GPs' self-evaluation of reactions to disclosure. Some participants viewed disclosure as essential for quality healthcare, disclosing their sexual orientation when necessary for medical treatment or to establish a trusting relationship with their GP, but others feared discrimination and preferred non-disclosure. GPs' characteristics and actions, such as creating a safe environment and using inclusive language, were crucial for facilitating disclosure.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings reinforce the significance of GP engagement in fostering safe and supportive environments for disclosure, ultimately improving healthcare access and outcomes for LGBT+ individuals in Slovenia.

摘要

背景

公开身份(“出柜”)对LGBT+群体来说是一个持续的过程,会影响他们生活的各个方面。虽然研究强调公开身份对LGBT+群体健康和福祉的重要性,但对污名化和歧视的担忧往往导致他们不公开身份,进而影响医疗服务的获取和治疗效果。在斯洛文尼亚,全科医生在医疗保健中起着关键作用,了解初级医疗保健环境中的公开身份动态至关重要。

方法

这项定性研究通过一项带有开放式问题的在线调查,来探索LGBT+群体和全科医生在公开身份方面的经历和期望。采用主题分析法从2021年10月至12月收集的数据中识别关键主题和子主题。

结果

在214名LGBT+参与者和28名全科医生中,出现了四个主要主题:公开身份的必要性和相关性;对不公开身份的恐惧、不安或中立态度;有助于公开身份的全科医生的特征和行为;以及全科医生对公开身份反应的自我评价。一些参与者认为公开身份对获得高质量医疗保健至关重要,会在必要时为了治疗或与全科医生建立信任关系而公开自己的性取向,但另一些人则担心受到歧视,倾向于不公开。全科医生的特征和行为,如营造安全的环境和使用包容性语言,对促进公开身份至关重要。

结论

我们的研究结果强化了全科医生参与营造安全和支持性公开身份环境的重要性,最终改善斯洛文尼亚LGBT+群体的医疗服务获取情况和治疗效果。

相似文献

1
Understanding (non)disclosure of sexual orientation and gender identity in Slovenian primary healthcare: Perspectives from LGBT+ individuals and general practitioners.了解斯洛文尼亚初级医疗保健中(不)公开性取向和性别认同的情况:来自LGBT+群体和全科医生的观点。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2025 Dec;31(1):2536236. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2025.2536236. Epub 2025 Jul 29.
2
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
3
Enhancing LGBT + primary healthcare in Slovenia: A national qualitative study of experiences and expectations of LGBT + people and family doctors.增强斯洛文尼亚的 LGBT+ 初级保健:LGBT+ 人群和家庭医生的经验和期望的国家定性研究。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2024 Dec;30(1):2373121. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2024.2373121. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
4
Development of a Conceptual Framework for Understanding Shared Decision making Among African-American LGBT Patients and their Clinicians.构建一个概念框架以理解非裔美国LGBT患者与其临床医生之间的共同决策过程。
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Jun;31(6):677-87. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3616-3.
5
Addressing Inequalities in Long Covid Healthcare: A Mixed-Methods Study on Building Inclusive Services.解决长期新冠医疗保健中的不平等问题:一项关于建立包容性服务的混合方法研究。
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70336. doi: 10.1111/hex.70336.
6
How Much Bullying and Discrimination Are Reported by Sexual and Gender Minorities in Orthopaedics?性少数群体和跨性别者在骨科报告的欺凌和歧视有多少?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Aug 1;482(8):1282-1292. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003009. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
7
Factors that influence caregivers' and adolescents' views and practices regarding human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination for adolescents: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响照顾者和青少年对青少年人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗接种的看法及做法的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Apr 15;4(4):CD013430. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013430.pub2.
8
Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of lay health worker programmes to improve access to maternal and child health: qualitative evidence synthesis.实施非专业卫生工作者项目以改善孕产妇和儿童健康服务可及性的障碍与促进因素:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 8;2013(10):CD010414. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010414.pub2.
9
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
10
Mistrust and missed opportunities: BDSM practitioner experiences in healthcare.不信任和错失的机会:BDSM 从业者在医疗保健中的体验。
J Sex Med. 2024 Oct 31;21(11):1047-1053. doi: 10.1093/jsxmed/qdae125.

本文引用的文献

1
Enhancing LGBT + primary healthcare in Slovenia: A national qualitative study of experiences and expectations of LGBT + people and family doctors.增强斯洛文尼亚的 LGBT+ 初级保健:LGBT+ 人群和家庭医生的经验和期望的国家定性研究。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2024 Dec;30(1):2373121. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2024.2373121. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
2
Assessing LGBTQ+ stigma among healthcare professionals: An application of the health stigma and discrimination framework in a qualitative, community-based participatory research study.评估医疗保健专业人员中的 LGBTQ+ 污名:在一项基于社区的定性参与式研究中应用健康污名和歧视框架。
J Health Psychol. 2022 Aug;27(9):2181-2196. doi: 10.1177/13591053211027652.
3
Strategies used by transmasculine and non-binary adults assigned female at birth to resist transgender stigma in healthcare.
出生时被认定为女性的跨性别男性和非二元性别成年人在医疗保健中抵制跨性别歧视所采用的策略。
Int J Transgend Health. 2020 Jul 2;21(3):350-365. doi: 10.1080/26895269.2020.1781017. eCollection 2020.
4
Health Impact of Stigma, Discrimination, Prejudice, and Bias Experienced by Transgender People: A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies.跨性别者所经历的污名、歧视、偏见和偏见对健康的影响:定量研究的系统评价。
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2022 Feb;43(2):111-118. doi: 10.1080/01612840.2021.1961330. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
5
A Systematic Review of the Discrimination Against Sexual and Gender Minority in Health Care Settings.医疗环境中对性少数群体和性别少数群体歧视的系统评价。
Int J Health Serv. 2020 Jan;50(1):44-61. doi: 10.1177/0020731419885093. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
6
Discrimination in the United States: Experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer Americans.美国的歧视:女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别和酷儿美国人的经历。
Health Serv Res. 2019 Dec;54 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):1454-1466. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13229. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
7
Training to reduce LGBTQ-related bias among medical, nursing, and dental students and providers: a systematic review.培训以减少医学、护理和牙科学生和提供者中与 LGBTQ 相关的偏见:系统评价。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Aug 30;19(1):325. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1727-3.
8
Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer/Questioning (LGBTQ) Perceptions and Health Care Experiences.女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别者、酷儿/疑问者(LGBTQ)的认知与医疗保健经历。
J Gay Lesbian Soc Serv. 2015;27(2):246-261. doi: 10.1080/10538720.2015.1022273. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
9
Primary Care Providers' Attitudes Related to LGBTQ People: A Narrative Literature Review.基层医疗服务提供者对 LGBTQ 群体的态度:一项叙述性文献综述。
Health Promot Pract. 2019 Mar;20(2):173-187. doi: 10.1177/1524839918778835. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
10
Sexual orientation disclosure in health care: a systematic review.性取向在医疗保健中的披露:系统评价。
Br J Gen Pract. 2018 Mar;68(668):e187-e196. doi: 10.3399/bjgp18X694841. Epub 2018 Jan 29.