Pastucha Małgorzata, Gos Elżbieta, Kochanek Krzysztof, Skarżyński Henryk, Jedrzejczak Wieslaw Wiktor
Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Warsaw, Poland.
World Hearing Center, Kajetany, Poland.
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 29;20(7):e0327726. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327726. eCollection 2025.
Traditional diagnostic methods of hearing assessment, such as pure tone audiometry, may not be equally accessible to everyone due to geographical or mobility limitations. Utilizing a mobile application (app) for self-assessment of hearing is a promising alternative. However, the effectiveness of apps, as well as their usability across different age groups, remains largely unexplored. The objective of the present study was to assess, across different age groups, the usability of the "Hearing Test" app which allows self-testing of hearing on a mobile phone.
The study was conducted on 77 participants from three age groups (16-39 years, 40-59 years, 60 years and older) who self-tested their hearing thresholds using the mobile app and who later underwent pure tone audiometry with an audiologist. The usability of the app was evaluated using a questionnaire based on the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS), which was complemented by participant observation and interview.
The app generally yielded results comparable to pure tone audiometry. However, older age groups tended to report higher levels of difficulty across several usability dimensions. Specifically, the oldest group rated the app lower in terms of functionality (M = 2.30; SD = 1.27) and engagement-customization (M = 2.11; SD = 1.28). For the oldest participants, the greatest difficulties related to installation (48%), and interpretation of results (26%). None of the participants aged 60 or older were able to complete the test independently, in contrast to 67% of the youngest participants and 28% of the middle-aged who did not require assistance. All age groups expressed a preference for a conventional hearing test over an app-based assessment, although the youngest group showed the greatest openness to using mobile apps.
The "Hearing Test" app has demonstrated its potential as a tool for initial hearing assessment, particularly among younger users. However, older individuals often encounter difficulties with installation, interpretation of results, and overall usability. Adapting the interface to meet the specific needs of older users, including user-friendly tutorials and clear presentation of results, is crucial for enhancing its usability.
传统的听力评估诊断方法,如纯音听力测试,由于地理或行动限制,并非对每个人都同样适用。利用移动应用程序(app)进行听力自我评估是一种很有前景的替代方法。然而,应用程序的有效性以及它们在不同年龄组中的可用性在很大程度上仍未得到探索。本研究的目的是评估不同年龄组中允许在手机上进行听力自测的“听力测试”应用程序的可用性。
该研究对来自三个年龄组(16 - 39岁、40 - 59岁、60岁及以上)的77名参与者进行,他们使用移动应用程序自测听力阈值,随后由听力学家进行纯音听力测试。基于移动应用程序评分量表(MARS)使用问卷对应用程序的可用性进行评估,并辅以参与者观察和访谈。
该应用程序通常产生与纯音听力测试相当的结果。然而,年龄较大的组在几个可用性维度上往往报告更高的难度水平。具体而言,最年长的组在功能(M = 2.30;标准差 = 1.27)和参与度 - 定制方面对应用程序的评分较低(M = 2.11;标准差 = 1.28)。对于最年长的参与者,最大的困难与安装(48%)和结果解释(26%)有关。与67%的最年轻参与者和28%的中年参与者无需帮助就能完成测试相比,60岁及以上的参与者中没有人能够独立完成测试。所有年龄组都表示更喜欢传统的听力测试而不是基于应用程序的评估,尽管最年轻的组对使用移动应用程序表现出最大的开放性。
“听力测试”应用程序已证明其作为初步听力评估工具的潜力,特别是在年轻用户中。然而,老年人在安装、结果解释和整体可用性方面经常遇到困难。调整界面以满足老年用户的特定需求,包括用户友好的教程和清晰的结果呈现,对于提高其可用性至关重要。