Suppr超能文献

药物预先授权及其对医疗服务提供者行为的影响:潜在类别分析

Prior Authorization of Medication and Its Influence on Provider Behavior: Latent Class Analysis.

作者信息

Salzbrenner Stephen, Scheier Lawrence M, Qiu Fang

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 985575 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, 68198, United States, 1 4025526007, 1 4025526035.

Lars Research Institute, Sun City, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jul 29;27:e75361. doi: 10.2196/75361.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Insurance companies frequently require prior authorization (PA) for medication prescriptions to ensure quality control and safety. The added layer of scrutiny can contribute to provider dissatisfaction and has been associated with adverse patient outcomes. Health care providers have changed prescribing behaviors to avoid PA. Understanding factors contributing to this phenomenon can facilitate systemic change and better patient care.

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of this study are to identify unique unobserved subgroups of prescribers with similar PA-related behaviors using a finite mixture modeling approach; characterize subgroup membership by important covariates; and examine the influence of subgroup membership on 3 relevant prescribing outcomes.

METHODS

A cross-sectional, web-based, nationwide survey of 1173 prescribers was oversampled for psychiatry in support of developing a software-as-a-solution to facilitate PA. Latent class analysis included 12 indicators assessing the degree of PA involvement, provider-insurance communication, and the methods of obtaining or avoiding PA. Covariates included age, gender, race, provider role, specialty, number of prescribers, and patient load. Three clinical decision outcomes included prescribing medication other than initially preferred due to PA delays, avoiding newer medications due to anticipated need for PA, and modifying a diagnosis to obtain PA.

RESULTS

In total, 1147 prescribers responded with 1144 usable surveys (age, median 50.003 [range 25.00, 72.00] years; 569 (49.74%) females; 67.13% White; 44.84% psychiatrists). In total, 4 unique classes were obtained based on 12 indicators assessing PA-related activities. Classes included a high PA denial class (291 [25.15%]), a Low Volume PA (178 [15.93%]), a class denoted by Problematic Communication Issues with insurers (227 [19.96%]), and a Low Volume PA Class with Problematic Experiences (446 [38.97%]). Only 3 of the 7 covariates (age, specialty type, and patient load) provided additional means to characterize class membership. The observation that certain demographics (race and gender) and provider characteristics (specialty) may not be informative has policy implications and can inform means to improve provider-insurer communication. The largest class reporting problematic PA experiences had significantly higher mean levels for changing their prescribing and diagnostic behaviors than the remaining classes.

CONCLUSIONS

Providers are not homogeneous regarding their experience with PA and insurance companies. It is, therefore, important to recognize subtle behavioral differences and find ways to accommodate the PA process to their unique needs. This will facilitate the appropriate implementation of PA by insurance companies. Providers can then avoid the need to alter medications, change diagnoses, or resist prescribing newer, effective medications that may require lengthy clinical documentation.

摘要

背景

保险公司经常要求对药物处方进行事先授权(PA),以确保质量控制和安全。这一额外的审查层次可能导致医疗服务提供者不满,并与患者不良结局相关。医疗服务提供者已经改变了处方行为以避免事先授权。了解导致这一现象的因素有助于系统变革和更好的患者护理。

目的

本研究的目的是使用有限混合模型方法识别具有相似PA相关行为的独特未观察到的开处方者亚组;通过重要协变量表征亚组成员资格;并检查亚组成员资格对3个相关处方结果的影响。

方法

对1173名开处方者进行了一项基于网络的全国性横断面调查,对精神病学进行了过度抽样,以支持开发一种软件解决方案来促进事先授权。潜在类别分析包括12个指标,评估事先授权的参与程度、提供者与保险公司的沟通以及获得或避免事先授权的方法。协变量包括年龄、性别、种族、提供者角色、专业、开处方者数量和患者负荷。三个临床决策结果包括由于事先授权延迟而开具非最初首选的药物、由于预期需要事先授权而避免使用更新的药物以及修改诊断以获得事先授权。

结果

共有1147名开处方者回复,其中1144份调查问卷可用(年龄中位数50.003岁[范围25.00,72.00];569名(49.74%)女性;67.13%为白人;44.84%为精神科医生)。基于评估PA相关活动的12个指标,共获得了4个独特的类别。类别包括高PA拒绝类别(291名[25.15%])、低数量PA类别(178名[15.93%])、与保险公司存在沟通问题的类别(227名[19.96%])以及有问题经历的低数量PA类别(446名[38.97%])。7个协变量中只有3个(年龄、专业类型和患者负荷)提供了表征亚组成员资格的额外方法。某些人口统计学特征(种族和性别)以及提供者特征(专业)可能没有信息价值这一观察结果具有政策意义,并可为改善提供者与保险公司沟通的方法提供参考。报告有PA问题经历的最大类别在改变处方和诊断行为方面的平均水平显著高于其他类别。

结论

医疗服务提供者在PA和保险公司方面的经历并非同质化。因此,认识到细微的行为差异并找到方法根据他们的独特需求调整PA流程非常重要。这将有助于保险公司适当实施PA。医疗服务提供者随后可以避免更改药物、改变诊断或拒绝开具可能需要冗长临床文件的更新、有效的药物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/953a/12306842/5741f29b7e3f/jmir-v27-e75361-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验