• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项观察性研究中专业背景对模拟心肺复苏视频评估的影响。

Influence of professional background on assessment of simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation videos in an observational study.

作者信息

Wetzel Thomas, Wienstroer Jan, Sopka Saša, Schroeder Hanna, Felzen Marc, Brokmann Jörg C, Plata Christopher

机构信息

Department for Acute and Emergency Medicine, Medical Faculty RWTH, Aachen University, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.

Institute for Medical Informatics, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 29;15(1):27648. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-12306-x.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-12306-x
PMID:40730845
Abstract

Video-assisted dispatcher support in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (VA-CPR) has shown beneficial effects on CPR quality. This study examines the influence of professional background on the ability to identify typical errors in CPR performance using video-based assessments. Within this simulation-based observational study, 61 participants (31 EMS personnel, 30 emergency physicians) evaluated nine video sequences showing simulated CPR or ventilation. Participants were grouped by profession, not randomly. The primary endpoint was the correct identification of expert-defined errors in the presented videos, analyzed in relation to professional background. Evaluation accuracy for CPR and ventilation videos was examined in relation to participant characteristics. Overall, n = 427 CPR videos were correctly classified in 73.3% of cases by EMS personnel and 75.7% by emergency physicians (β = 0.370, SE = 0.297, 95% CI: -0.21 to 0.95, p = 0.213). Ventilation scenarios (n = 122) were correctly classified in 93.5% (EMS) and 98.3%, (EP) (β = 4.50, SE = 6.73, 95% CI: -8.82 to 17.82, p = 0.505). The models assessing classification accuracy for CPR and ventilation did not reach statistical significance (p=0.869 and p=0.183), and none of the tested predictors were significantly associated with evaluation accuracy. No significant differences in evaluation accuracy for CPR and ventilation videos were observed between professional groups or across tested participant characteristics.

摘要

心肺复苏术中的视频辅助调度员支持(VA-CPR)已显示出对心肺复苏质量有有益影响。本研究使用基于视频的评估方法,考察专业背景对识别心肺复苏操作中典型错误能力的影响。在这项基于模拟的观察性研究中,61名参与者(31名急救医疗服务人员、30名急诊医生)评估了9个显示模拟心肺复苏或通气的视频序列。参与者按职业分组,而非随机分组。主要终点是正确识别所呈现视频中专家定义的错误,并根据专业背景进行分析。针对参与者特征,考察了心肺复苏和通气视频的评估准确性。总体而言,急救医疗服务人员在73.3%的病例中正确分类了n = 427个心肺复苏视频,急诊医生的正确分类率为75.7%(β = 0.370,标准误 = 0.297,95%置信区间:-0.21至0.95,p = 0.213)。通气场景(n = 122)的正确分类率在急救医疗服务人员中为93.5%,在急诊医生中为98.3%(β = 4.50,标准误 = 6.73,95%置信区间:-8.82至17.82,p = 0.505)。评估心肺复苏和通气分类准确性的模型未达到统计学显著性(p = 0.869和p = 0.183),且没有一个测试预测因子与评估准确性显著相关。在专业组之间或在所测试的参与者特征中,未观察到心肺复苏和通气视频评估准确性的显著差异。

相似文献

1
Influence of professional background on assessment of simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation videos in an observational study.一项观察性研究中专业背景对模拟心肺复苏视频评估的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 29;15(1):27648. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-12306-x.
2
Impact of a short training on the recognition of excessively deep chest compressions during video-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized controlled simulation trial.短期培训对视频辅助心肺复苏期间识别过深胸外按压的影响:一项随机对照模拟试验。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 11;25(1):1033. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07524-w.
3
Quality of audio-assisted versus video-assisted dispatcher-instructed bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.音频辅助与视频辅助调度员指导旁观者心肺复苏的质量:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Resuscitation. 2018 Feb;123:77-85. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.12.010. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
4
Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and outcomes of mass cardiac arrests caused by a crowd crush.旁观者心肺复苏与人群挤压导致的大规模心脏骤停的结局
Resuscitation. 2025 Jan;206:110476. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110476. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
5
Continuous chest compression versus interrupted chest compression for cardiopulmonary resuscitation of non-asphyxial out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.持续胸外按压与间断胸外按压用于非窒息性院外心脏骤停心肺复苏的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 27;3(3):CD010134. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010134.pub2.
6
Effectiveness of different compression-to-ventilation methods for cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A systematic review.不同心肺复苏按压-通气方法的有效性:系统评价。
Resuscitation. 2017 Sep;118:112-125. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.05.032. Epub 2017 Jun 2.
7
Influence of different relationships of bystanders to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients on the effectiveness of dispatcher-assisted CPR.旁观者与院外心脏骤停患者的不同关系对调度员辅助心肺复苏效果的影响。
BMC Emerg Med. 2025 Jun 3;25(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12873-025-01244-6.
8
Feasibility of video-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation when the lay responder is alone with the victim: a randomized controlled crossover pilot study.当现场急救者单独面对受害者时实施视频辅助心肺复苏的可行性:一项随机对照交叉试点研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 19;15(1):26268. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-12014-6.
9
A Pilot Randomized Controlled Study to Determine the Effect of Real-Time Videos With Smart Glass on the Performance of the Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.一项确定智能眼镜实时视频对心肺复苏操作影响的前瞻性随机对照研究。
Comput Inform Nurs. 2025 Feb 1;43(2):e01211. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000001211.
10
Cardiac Arrest in Outpatient Hemodialysis Units: A National Cross-Sectional Survey of Dialysis Technicians.门诊血液透析单位的心脏骤停:对透析技术员的全国横断面调查
Am J Kidney Dis. 2025 Jul;86(1):43-51.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2024.12.012. Epub 2025 Feb 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Quality of Layperson CPR Instructions From Artificial Intelligence Voice Assistants.人工智能语音助手提供的非专业心肺复苏指导的质量
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2331205. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.31205.
2
[Implementation status of dispatch-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic].[调度辅助心肺复苏的实施现状及新型冠状病毒肺炎大流行的影响]
Notf Rett Med. 2022;25(7):519-520. doi: 10.1007/s10049-022-01017-9. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
3
Dispatcher Self-assessment and Attitude Toward Video Assistance as a New Tool in Simulated Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.
调度员自我评估与对视频辅助作为模拟心肺复苏新工具的态度。
West J Emerg Med. 2022 Feb 28;23(2):229-234. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2021.12.53027.
4
Outcomes of audio-instructed and video-instructed dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.音频指导和视频指导调度员辅助心肺复苏的结果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Med. 2022 Dec;54(1):464-471. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2022.2032314.
5
Live video from bystanders' smartphones to improve cardiopulmonary resuscitation.旁观者使用智能手机实时传输视频以改善心肺复苏术。
Resuscitation. 2021 Nov;168:35-43. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.08.048. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
6
Live video from bystanders' smartphones to medical dispatchers in real emergencies.在真正的紧急情况下,旁观者的智能手机向医疗调度员实时传输视频。
BMC Emerg Med. 2021 Sep 6;21(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12873-021-00493-5.
7
Impact of video quality when evaluating video-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized, controlled simulation trial.评估视频辅助心肺复苏术时视频质量的影响:一项随机、对照模拟试验。
BMC Emerg Med. 2021 Aug 21;21(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12873-021-00486-4.
8
Video-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation: Does the camera perspective matter? A randomized, controlled simulation trial.视频辅助心肺复苏术:摄像机视角重要吗?一项随机对照模拟试验。
J Telemed Telecare. 2024 Jan;30(1):98-106. doi: 10.1177/1357633X211028490. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
9
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Basic Life Support.《2021年欧洲复苏委员会指南:基础生命支持》
Resuscitation. 2021 Apr;161:98-114. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.009. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
10
Survival Following Lay Resuscitation.存活于非专业急救后
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2020 Dec 21;117(51-52):871-877. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2020.0871.