Bates Geoff, Newberry Pablo, McClatchey Rachael, Newman Jack, Ayres Sarah
Institute for Policy Research, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.
School of Civil, Aerospace and Design Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 Jul 29;23(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12961-025-01379-9.
In the United Kingdom the government's new health mission aims to reduce the burden on healthcare services by shifting from treating poor health to prevention. Delivering this requires action on health in policy arenas outside of the health sector such as urban development, as urban environments are key health determinants. However, change is challenging in complex and long-established policy systems and structures. Systems methods can enhance research into such contexts and demonstrate opportunities for delivering cross-cutting preventative health agendas.
This study aimed to enhance understanding of how health is integrated in urban development policymaking, and how to bring about change to support healthier development. It was undertaken over two stages. Firstly, a thematic analysis of data from interviews with 37 United Kingdom policy officials exploring urban development decision-making in central government. Secondly, the development of a causal loop diagram based on the variables and connections between them, identified in the interview data.
Analysis revealed how health is not well integrated in urban development policymaking. Through mapping 15 important influencing variables, we identified four main areas where change can be delivered: senior leadership on preventative health, responsibility in urban development teams for health, opportunities in urban development for health experts to promote ideas, and the capacity and capability of officials to act. Addressing any of the factors identified will likely have benefits, but it is by bringing change to multiple highlighted areas that health integration will be maximized.
If the United Kingdom Government's health mission is to be effective, policymakers must be empowered and incentivized to act on health in areas such as urban development. There is recent evidence of enhanced leadership on health prevention, but this must be supported in in several ways simultaneously, with increased funding, facilitating joined up working across sectors, and enhancing the use of tools and evidence to understand and promote health outcomes. By taking a systems approach this study adds value to existing understandings by going beyond isolated challenges and opportunities, to illustrate the connections between them and, therefore, how any changes are likely to have wider effects.
在英国,政府的新健康使命旨在通过从治疗健康问题转向预防,来减轻医疗服务的负担。要实现这一目标,需要在卫生部门以外的政策领域(如城市发展)采取促进健康的行动,因为城市环境是健康的关键决定因素。然而,在复杂且长期存在的政策体系和结构中,变革具有挑战性。系统方法可以加强对这类背景的研究,并展示实现跨领域预防性健康议程的机会。
本研究旨在增进对健康如何融入城市发展政策制定,以及如何促成变革以支持更健康发展的理解。研究分两个阶段进行。首先,对37名英国政策官员进行访谈,对探讨中央政府城市发展决策的数据进行主题分析。其次,根据访谈数据中确定的变量及其之间的联系,绘制因果循环图。
分析表明,健康在城市发展政策制定中并未得到很好的整合。通过梳理15个重要影响变量,我们确定了可以实现变革的四个主要领域:预防性健康方面的高层领导、城市发展团队对健康的责任、城市发展中健康专家推广理念的机会,以及官员采取行动的能力。解决所确定的任何一个因素可能都会带来益处,但要使健康整合最大化,就需要在多个突出领域带来变革。
如果英国政府的健康使命要取得成效,政策制定者必须被赋予权力并受到激励,在城市发展等领域采取促进健康的行动。最近有证据表明在健康预防方面的领导力有所增强,但这必须同时在多个方面得到支持,包括增加资金、促进跨部门协同工作,以及加强使用工具和证据来理解和促进健康成果。通过采用系统方法,本研究超越了孤立的挑战和机会,阐述了它们之间的联系,以及因此任何变革可能如何产生更广泛的影响,从而为现有认识增添了价值。