Suppr超能文献

口腔修复学中陶瓷材料、表面处理及粘结水门汀对剪切粘结强度影响的体外评估

An In Vitro Evaluation of the Effect of Ceramic Material, Surface Treatment, and Adhesive Cement on Shear Bond Strength in Prosthodontics.

作者信息

Mureșan Izabella Éva, Cerghizan Diana, Gergely Attila, Farmos Rudolf-László, Jakab-Farkas László, Șimon John-Jason, Kerekes-Máthé Bernadette, Giliga Dóra-Anna, Kis Esztella Éva, Jánosi Kinga Mária, Mártha Krisztina

机构信息

Faculty of Dental Medicine, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Targu Mureș, 38 Gh. Marinescu Str., 540139 Targu Mures, Romania.

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Technical and Human Sciences, Sapientia Hungarian University of Transylvania, 2 Calea Sighișoarei Str., 540485 Targu Mures, Romania.

出版信息

Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jun 20;61(7):1118. doi: 10.3390/medicina61071118.

Abstract

: Ensuring the optimal shear bond strength (SBS) is essential for the long-term success of prosthodontic restorations. Our in vitro study aimed to evaluate the SBS of three types of ceramics (feldspathic, alumina, and lithium disilicates) using three adhesive cements (Variolink Esthetic LC, Variolink Esthetic DC, and Maxcem Elite). : Healthy molars were prepared, and ceramic blocks were cemented following universally accepted luting protocols. SBS tests were performed using a custom-made testing machine. A multiple linear regression model assessed the effects of ceramic type, surface treatment, and luting agent on SBS. : The regression model explained 61.3% of the variation in SBS values (R = 0.613); the adjusted R = 0.605 confirmed the model's robustness. The global F-test was statistically significant (F = 78.96, < 0.001). The total-etch technique (+4.47), the use of feldspathic ceramic, and 5% hydrofluoric acid treatment (+3.28) significantly affected SBS. Feldspathic ceramic and lithium disilicate showed superior performance against alumina. Light-cured and self-cured cement showed negative effects. : Ceramic material and cement type have combined effects on SBS. Optimal results were obtained with the total-etch technique, feldspathic ceramic, 5% hydrofluoric acid treatment, and dual-cured cement.

摘要

确保最佳的剪切粘结强度(SBS)对于口腔修复体的长期成功至关重要。我们的体外研究旨在使用三种粘结剂(Variolink Esthetic LC、Variolink Esthetic DC和Maxcem Elite)评估三种类型陶瓷(长石质陶瓷、氧化铝陶瓷和二硅酸锂陶瓷)的SBS。

准备健康的磨牙,并按照普遍接受的粘结方案粘结陶瓷块。使用定制测试机进行SBS测试。多元线性回归模型评估陶瓷类型、表面处理和粘结剂对SBS的影响。

回归模型解释了SBS值变化的61.3%(R = 0.613);调整后的R = 0.605证实了模型的稳健性。全局F检验具有统计学意义(F = 78.96,P < 0.001)。全酸蚀技术(+4.47)、使用长石质陶瓷以及5%氢氟酸处理(+3.28)对SBS有显著影响。长石质陶瓷和二硅酸锂陶瓷相对于氧化铝陶瓷表现出更好的性能。光固化粘结剂和自固化粘结剂显示出负面影响。

陶瓷材料和粘结剂类型对SBS有综合影响。采用全酸蚀技术、长石质陶瓷、5%氢氟酸处理和双重固化粘结剂可获得最佳结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验