• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抗癌药物与直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)的药代动力学药物相互作用推荐意见的差异:不同临床决策支持系统及来源的比较分析

Discrepancies in Recommendations on Pharmacokinetic Drug Interactions for Anticancer Medications and Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOAC): A Comparative Analysis of Different Clinical Decision Support Systems and Sources.

作者信息

Nowinski Karolina, Chaireti Roza

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Karolinska University Hospital, SE 14186 Stockholm, Sweden.

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, SE 17176 Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025 Jul 16;18(7):1044. doi: 10.3390/ph18071044.

DOI:10.3390/ph18071044
PMID:40732331
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12299613/
Abstract

In some cases of concomitant use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) and certain anticancer medications, pharmacokinetic interactions are expected; however, clinical data is scarce. This report reviews the recommendations on the use of DOAC concurrently with anticancer drugs according to different clinical decision support systems and sources, with a focus on discrepancies. We reviewed the recommendations from the American Heart Association (AHA), European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), summary of product characteristics (SPC) in FASS (Swedish medicine information portal), the Swedish clinical decision support system Janusmed, and information from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on the concomitant use of apixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban (activated factor X (FXa) inhibitors) and 80 anticancer drugs from 11 categories (240 drug pairs). No warnings of expected pharmacokinetic drug interactions between FXa inhibitors and anticancer drugs were found for 155 drug pairs (65%) across all sources. The remaining 35% of drug pairs were flagged as having possible interactions with FXa inhibitors according to at least one source. Discrepancies in the recommendations from the different sources were reported. The reported discrepancies were, for the most part, associated with different assessments of the mechanism and the extent of pharmacokinetic interactions of each anticancer medication. Also, knowledge sources have different approaches to reporting potential interactions, in some cases reporting clinically relevant strictly pharmacokinetic interactions, whereas others include even patient-specific factors. The lack of clinical data and different recommendations can make clinical decisions on the concomitant use of DOAC and anticancer drugs difficult. Our compilation is meant to assist clinicians in making decisions based on the available evidence, even if it is scarce.

摘要

在某些直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)与某些抗癌药物联合使用的情况下,预计会发生药代动力学相互作用;然而,临床数据却很匮乏。本报告根据不同的临床决策支持系统和信息来源,回顾了DOAC与抗癌药物联合使用的相关建议,重点关注其中的差异。我们查阅了美国心脏协会(AHA)、欧洲心律协会(EHRA)、瑞典药品信息门户网站FASS中的产品特性摘要(SPC)、瑞典临床决策支持系统Janusmed,以及美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)关于阿哌沙班、依度沙班和利伐沙班(活化因子X(FXa)抑制剂)与11类80种抗癌药物联合使用的信息(共240种药物组合)。在所有信息来源中,155种药物组合(65%)未发现FXa抑制剂与抗癌药物之间存在预期的药代动力学药物相互作用的警告。其余35%的药物组合至少在一个信息来源中被标记为可能与FXa抑制剂存在相互作用。报告了不同信息来源建议中的差异。所报告的差异大多与对每种抗癌药物药代动力学相互作用的机制和程度的不同评估有关。此外,知识来源在报告潜在相互作用方面有不同的方法,在某些情况下报告严格意义上的临床相关药代动力学相互作用,而其他一些则甚至包括患者特异性因素。临床数据的缺乏和不同的建议可能会使关于DOAC与抗癌药物联合使用的临床决策变得困难。我们的汇编旨在帮助临床医生根据现有证据(即使证据稀少)做出决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2dba/12299613/639119968f2c/pharmaceuticals-18-01044-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2dba/12299613/639119968f2c/pharmaceuticals-18-01044-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2dba/12299613/639119968f2c/pharmaceuticals-18-01044-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Discrepancies in Recommendations on Pharmacokinetic Drug Interactions for Anticancer Medications and Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOAC): A Comparative Analysis of Different Clinical Decision Support Systems and Sources.抗癌药物与直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)的药代动力学药物相互作用推荐意见的差异:不同临床决策支持系统及来源的比较分析
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025 Jul 16;18(7):1044. doi: 10.3390/ph18071044.
2
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
3
Comparison of the effectiveness of inhaler devices in asthma and chronic obstructive airways disease: a systematic review of the literature.吸入装置在哮喘和慢性阻塞性气道疾病中的有效性比较:文献系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(26):1-149. doi: 10.3310/hta5260.
4
Interventions to improve safe and effective medicines use by consumers: an overview of systematic reviews.改善消费者安全有效用药的干预措施:系统评价概述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 29;2014(4):CD007768. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007768.pub3.
5
Interventions for preventing and reducing the use of physical restraints for older people in all long-term care settings.预防和减少所有长期护理环境中老年人使用身体约束的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 28;7(7):CD007546. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007546.pub3.
6
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
7
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
8
The quantity, quality and findings of network meta-analyses evaluating the effectiveness of GLP-1 RAs for weight loss: a scoping review.评估胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1 RAs)减肥效果的网状Meta分析的数量、质量及结果:一项范围综述
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jun 25:1-73. doi: 10.3310/SKHT8119.
9
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
10
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训

本文引用的文献

1
Potential Adverse Drug Events Identified with Decision Support Algorithms from Janusmed Risk Profile-A Retrospective Population-Based Study in a Swedish Region.通过Janusmed风险评估中的决策支持算法识别出的潜在药物不良事件——瑞典某地区一项基于人群的回顾性研究
Pharmacy (Basel). 2024 Nov 15;12(6):168. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy12060168.
2
A practical assessment protocol for clinically relevant P-glycoprotein-mediated drug-drug interactions.一种针对临床相关P-糖蛋白介导的药物相互作用的实用评估方案。
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Sep 30;15:1412692. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1412692. eCollection 2024.
3
2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS).
2024年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)心房颤动管理指南,与欧洲心胸外科学会(EACTS)联合制定。
Eur Heart J. 2024 Sep 29;45(36):3314-3414. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae176.
4
Polypharmacy and drug interactions in older patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy: associated factors.癌症化疗老年患者的多种药物治疗和药物相互作用:相关因素。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jun 25;24(1):557. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05135-6.
5
Atrial fibrillation: epidemiology, screening and digital health.心房颤动:流行病学、筛查与数字健康。
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2024 Feb 1;37:100786. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100786. eCollection 2024 Feb.
6
Pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions with direct anticoagulants in the management of cancer-associated thrombosis.癌症相关血栓形成的管理中直接抗凝药物的药物代谢动力学药物-药物相互作用。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2023 Aug;89(8):2369-2376. doi: 10.1111/bcp.15785. Epub 2023 May 23.
7
American Geriatrics Society 2023 updated AGS Beers Criteria® for potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults.美国老年医学学会 2023 年更新了老年人潜在不适当药物使用的 AGS Beers 标准®。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Jul;71(7):2052-2081. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18372. Epub 2023 May 4.
8
Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis and Treatment in Patients With Cancer: ASCO Guideline Update.静脉血栓栓塞症预防和治疗癌症患者:ASCO 指南更新。
J Clin Oncol. 2023 Jun 1;41(16):3063-3071. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.00294. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
9
Pharmacological Risk Assessment Among Older Patients with Polypharmacy Using the Clinical Decision Support System Janusmed Risk Profile: A Cross-Sectional Register Study.使用 Janusmed 风险分析工具评估老年多病患者的药物治疗风险:一项基于登记资料的横断面研究
Drugs Aging. 2023 Apr;40(4):369-376. doi: 10.1007/s40266-023-01021-9. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
10
Interaction alerts: A comparison of classifications and recommendations for clinical management between Janusmed and three other knowledge resources.相互作用警报:Janusmed与其他三种知识资源之间的分类及临床管理建议比较
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2023 May;132(5):403-415. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.13843. Epub 2023 Feb 21.