Garg Ayushi, Rao Rohit, Tejawinata Felicia, Shamita Gazi Amena Noor, Herpel McKay S, Yoshida Akihiro, Goolamier Gordon, Sidiropoulos Jessica, Sheng Iris Y, Abboud Salim-Tamuz, Rothermel Luke D, Azar Nami, Mangla Ankit
Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.
Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Vaccines (Basel). 2025 Jul 3;13(7):727. doi: 10.3390/vaccines13070727.
Checkpoint inhibitor therapy revolutionized the treatment of patients with melanoma. However, in patients where melanoma exhibits resistance to checkpoint inhibitor therapy, the treatment options are limited. Oncolytic viruses are a unique form of immunotherapy that uses live viruses to infect and lyse tumor cells to release the elusive neoantigen picked up by the antigen-presenting cells, thus increasing the chances of an immune response against cancer. Coupled with checkpoint inhibitors, intratumoral injections of the oncolytic virus can help an enhanced immune response, especially in a tumor that displays resistance to checkpoint inhibitors. However, oncolytic viruses are not bereft of challenges and face several obstacles in the tumor microenvironment. From the historical use of wild viruses to the sophisticated use of genetically modified viruses in the current era, oncolytic virus therapy has evolved tremendously in the last two decades. Increasing the ability of the virus to select the malignant cells over the non-malignant ones, circumventing the antiviral immune response from the body, and enhancing the oncolytic properties of the viral platform by attaching various ligands are some of the several improvements made in the last three decades. In this manuscript, we trace the journey of the development of oncolytic virus therapy, especially in the context of melanoma. We review the clinical trials of talimogene laherparepvec in patients with melanoma. We also review the data available from the clinical trials of vusolimogene oderparepvec in patients with melanoma. Finally, we review the use of various oncolytic viruses and their challenges in clinical development. This manuscript aims to create a comprehensive literature review for clinicians to understand and implement oncolytic virus therapy in patients diagnosed with melanoma.
检查点抑制剂疗法彻底改变了黑色素瘤患者的治疗方式。然而,对于黑色素瘤对检查点抑制剂疗法产生耐药性的患者,治疗选择有限。溶瘤病毒是一种独特的免疫疗法,它利用活病毒感染并裂解肿瘤细胞,释放出抗原呈递细胞捕捉到的难以捉摸的新抗原,从而增加针对癌症的免疫反应机会。与检查点抑制剂联合使用时,瘤内注射溶瘤病毒有助于增强免疫反应,尤其是在对检查点抑制剂耐药的肿瘤中。然而,溶瘤病毒并非没有挑战,在肿瘤微环境中面临着几个障碍。从过去使用野生病毒到如今巧妙地使用基因改造病毒,溶瘤病毒疗法在过去二十年中取得了巨大进展。在过去三十年中取得的一些改进包括提高病毒区分恶性细胞和非恶性细胞的能力、规避机体的抗病毒免疫反应,以及通过连接各种配体增强病毒平台的溶瘤特性。在本手稿中,我们追溯溶瘤病毒疗法的发展历程,特别是在黑色素瘤背景下。我们回顾了talimogene laherparepvec治疗黑色素瘤患者的临床试验。我们还回顾了vusolimogene oderparepvec治疗黑色素瘤患者的临床试验所获得的数据。最后,我们回顾了各种溶瘤病毒的使用情况及其在临床开发中面临的挑战。本手稿旨在为临床医生创建一篇全面的文献综述,以帮助他们理解并在诊断为黑色素瘤的患者中实施溶瘤病毒疗法。