文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

翻修单侧双孔道内镜腰椎手术的要点与陷阱:技术说明

Pearls and Pitfalls of Revision Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Technical Note.

作者信息

Fong Jiawen, Chou Zi Xian Justin, Wong Walter-Soon-Yaw, Huang Yilun

机构信息

Orthopaedic Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore, SGP.

Orthopaedic Surgery, Total Orthopaedic Care and Surgery, Singapore, SGP.

出版信息

Cureus. 2025 Jun 29;17(6):e86958. doi: 10.7759/cureus.86958. eCollection 2025 Jun.


DOI:10.7759/cureus.86958
PMID:40734892
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12306511/
Abstract

We aim to describe our revision unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar spine surgery (RUBELSS) approach, emphasising pre-operative planning, surgical technique, and management of complications. Key steps include utilising various endoscopic approaches based on the compression site, pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and radiograph analysis for surgical planning, and meticulous decompression with attention to anatomical landmarks. Additionally, potential complications like dural tears and intra-operative bleeding, as well as their bailout options, are discussed. Revision decompression for degenerative lumbar disease traditionally involves open or microscopic approaches. Endoscopic spine surgery (ESS) offers advantages over these approaches, including improved visualisation, reduced soft tissue disruption, and better short-term outcomes. Overall, RUBELSS presents a viable alternative for revision decompression, offering advantages over traditional techniques with superior short-term outcomes, faster operating times, and reduced complications.

摘要

我们旨在描述我们的改良单侧双孔道内镜腰椎手术(RUBELSS)方法,重点介绍术前规划、手术技术和并发症处理。关键步骤包括根据压迫部位采用各种内镜方法、术前利用磁共振成像(MRI)和X线片分析进行手术规划,以及注意解剖标志进行细致减压。此外,还讨论了硬膜撕裂和术中出血等潜在并发症及其补救措施。传统上,退变性腰椎疾病的翻修减压手术采用开放或显微镜下手术方法。内镜脊柱手术(ESS)相对于这些方法具有优势,包括视野改善、软组织损伤减少以及短期效果更好。总体而言,RUBELSS为翻修减压提供了一种可行的替代方法,与传统技术相比具有优势,短期效果更佳、手术时间更短且并发症减少。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9029/12306511/1ff8b7ada51b/cureus-0017-00000086958-i09.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9029/12306511/7592d537684d/cureus-0017-00000086958-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9029/12306511/935dc5f4212f/cureus-0017-00000086958-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9029/12306511/8e2bc3a2d9ac/cureus-0017-00000086958-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9029/12306511/68c06be3eaf3/cureus-0017-00000086958-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9029/12306511/8ce9182df987/cureus-0017-00000086958-i05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9029/12306511/11b42394483b/cureus-0017-00000086958-i06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9029/12306511/1af67db9f833/cureus-0017-00000086958-i07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9029/12306511/472bf379544b/cureus-0017-00000086958-i08.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9029/12306511/1ff8b7ada51b/cureus-0017-00000086958-i09.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9029/12306511/7592d537684d/cureus-0017-00000086958-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9029/12306511/935dc5f4212f/cureus-0017-00000086958-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9029/12306511/8e2bc3a2d9ac/cureus-0017-00000086958-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9029/12306511/68c06be3eaf3/cureus-0017-00000086958-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9029/12306511/8ce9182df987/cureus-0017-00000086958-i05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9029/12306511/11b42394483b/cureus-0017-00000086958-i06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9029/12306511/1af67db9f833/cureus-0017-00000086958-i07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9029/12306511/472bf379544b/cureus-0017-00000086958-i08.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9029/12306511/1ff8b7ada51b/cureus-0017-00000086958-i09.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Pearls and Pitfalls of Revision Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Technical Note.

Cureus. 2025-6-29

[2]
Percutaneous Endoscopic Decompression for Lumbar Central and Lateral Recess Spinal Stenosis: A Combined Uni-Portal and Bi-Portal Approach.

JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2025-7-17

[3]
Advances in endoscopic lumbar spine surgery: a comprehensive review of the techniques used for the treatment of lumbar disc herniations and spinal stenosis and lumbar spinal fusion.

Spine J. 2025-6-25

[4]
Comprehensive Review of Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery: History, Techniques, and Implications in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2025-3-19

[5]
Comparison of short-term clinical outcomes and muscle injury in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis undergoing arthroscopic-assisted uni-portal spinal surgery, unilateral biportal endoscopic surgery, and percutaneous interlaminar lumbar discectomy: a six-month follow-up.

J Orthop Surg Res. 2025-7-21

[6]
Clinical Efficacy of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

World Neurosurg. 2025-1

[7]
Clinical Efficacy of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy with Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression.

World Neurosurg. 2025-1

[8]
History of endoscopic spine surgery: where did it all begin? Development of indications and techniques.

Spine J. 2025-7-11

[9]
The utilization of a novel Outpatient Appropriateness Fragility Score to predict inpatient stay following biportal lumbar endoscopic decompression.

N Am Spine Soc J. 2025-6-18

[10]
Endoscopic spinal surgery in adjacent segment disease-a viable alternative to transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a case report.

J Spine Surg. 2025-6-27

本文引用的文献

[1]
Hospital cost differences between open and endoscopic lumbar spine decompression surgery.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2024-1-1

[2]
Complications and Management of Endoscopic Spinal Surgery.

Neurospine. 2023-3

[3]
Contraindications and Complications of Full Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Systematic Review.

World Neurosurg. 2022-12

[4]
Complications of Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy versus Open Lumbar Microdiscectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

World Neurosurg. 2022-12

[5]
A Narrative Review of Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Using Interlaminar Approach.

World Neurosurg. 2022-12

[6]
Successful Criteria for Indirect Decompression With Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Neurospine. 2022-9

[7]
Incidence of Revision Surgery After Decompression With vs Without Fusion Among Patients With Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

JAMA Netw Open. 2022-7-1

[8]
Advantages of Revision Transforaminal Full-Endoscopic Spine Surgery in Patients who have Previously Undergone Posterior Spine Surgery.

J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2023-11

[9]
Endoscopic decompression for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2022-4-1

[10]
Fibrin sealants in lumbar annuloplasty after endoscopic discectomy as a method to prevent recurrent lumbar disc herniation.

Eur J Transl Myol. 2020-3-4

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索