• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤后应激障碍动态静息态功能连接的数据驱动方法:一项ENIGMA-PGC创伤后应激障碍研究

Data-Driven Approach to Dynamic Resting State Functional Connectivity in Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: An ENIGMA-PGC PTSD Study.

作者信息

Tomas Carissa W, Fitzgerald Jacklynn M, Baird C Lexi, Haswell Courtney C, Abdallah Chadi G, Angstadt Michael, Baker Justin T, Berg Hannah, Blackford Jennifer U, Cisler Josh, Cotton Andrew S, Daniels Judith K, Davenport Nicholas D, Davidson Richard J, deRoon-Cassini Terri A, Disner Seth G, El Hage Wissam, Fani Negar, Frijling Jessie L, Gordon Evan M, Grupe Daniel W, He Xiaofu, Herringa Ryan, Hofmann David, Huggins Ashley A, Hussain Ahmed, Ipser Jonathan, Jahanshad Neda, Jovanovic Tanja, Kaufman Milissa L, Kim Yoojean, King Anthony, Koch Saskia B J, Koopowitz Sheri, Lazarov Amit, Lebois Lauren A M, Liberzon Isreal, Lissek Shmuel, Manthey Antje, May Geoffrey, McLaughlin Katie A, Nawijn Laura, Nelson Steven M, Neria Yuval, Nitschke Jack B, Olatunji Bunmi O, Olff Miranda, Peverill Matthew, Quidé Yann, Ravid Orren, Ressler Kerry, Ross Marisa, Salminen Lauren E, Sambrook Kelly, Shih Chiahao, Sierk Anika, Sponheim Scott R, Stein Dan J, Stevens Jennifer, Straube Thomas, Suarez-Jimenez Benjamin, Thompson Paul M, van der Wee Nic J A, van der Werff Steven J A, van Rooij Sanne J H, van Zuiden Mirjam, Veltman Dick J, Vermeiren Robert R J M, Walter Henrik, Wang Xin, Xie Hong, Zhu Xi, Zilcha-Mano Sigal, Larson Christine L, Morey Rajendra

机构信息

Division of Epidemiology and Social Sciences, Institute of Health and Equity, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.

Comprehensive Injury Center, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.

出版信息

Hum Brain Mapp. 2025 Aug 1;46(11):e70116. doi: 10.1002/hbm.70116.

DOI:10.1002/hbm.70116
PMID:40736265
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12308910/
Abstract

Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) have been associated with aberrations in brain networks in the absence of a given cognitive demand or task, called resting-state networks. Prior work has focused on disruption in the static functional connectivity (FC) among specific regions constrained by a priori hypotheses. However, dynamic FC, an approach that examines brain network characteristics over time, may provide a more sensitive measure to understand the network properties underlying dysfunction in PTSD. Further, using a data-driven analytic approach may reveal the contribution of other larger network disturbances beyond those revealed by hypothesis-driven examinations of ROIs or canonical networks. Therefore, the current study used group independent components analysis (ICA) and graph theory principles to identify, characterize, and subsequently compare brain network dynamics and recurrent connectivity states in a large sample of trauma exposed individuals (N = 1035) with and without PTSD from the ENIGMA-PGC PTSD workgroup. Neither static FC nor dynamic FC results showed robust differences between groups. There were also no group differences in dwell time or number of transitions of recurrent connectivity states. This multi-cohort sample with heterogenous trauma types and demographic features offers a significantly larger scale approach than prior literature with smaller homogenous trauma cohorts. Heterogeneity of PTSD, especially within diffuse brain networks, may not be captured by evaluating only diagnostic groups, further work should be done to evaluate brain network dynamics with respect to specific symptom profiles and trauma types.

摘要

使用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)技术,创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的症状已被发现与静息态网络(即在没有特定认知需求或任务的情况下大脑网络的异常)有关。先前的研究主要集中在先验假设所限定的特定区域之间静态功能连接(FC)的破坏上。然而,动态功能连接(一种随时间检查大脑网络特征的方法)可能为理解PTSD功能障碍背后的网络特性提供更敏感的测量手段。此外,使用数据驱动的分析方法可能会揭示除假设驱动的感兴趣区域(ROI)或典型网络检查所揭示的之外的其他更大网络干扰的作用。因此,本研究使用组独立成分分析(ICA)和图论原理,对来自ENIGMA-PGC PTSD工作组的一大群有创伤暴露经历的个体(N = 1035)进行研究,这些个体中有或没有PTSD,以识别、表征并随后比较大脑网络动力学和反复连接状态。静态FC和动态FC结果均未显示出组间的显著差异。反复连接状态的停留时间或转换次数在组间也没有差异。与之前较小的同质创伤队列研究相比,这个具有异质创伤类型和人口统计学特征的多队列样本提供了一个规模显著更大的研究方法。PTSD的异质性,尤其是在弥漫性脑网络中,仅通过评估诊断组可能无法捕捉到,应进一步开展工作以评估针对特定症状特征和创伤类型的脑网络动力学。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b55/12308910/fcd02e75ba5f/HBM-46-e70116-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b55/12308910/b268dee6aeb0/HBM-46-e70116-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b55/12308910/b11d1854f79e/HBM-46-e70116-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b55/12308910/fcd02e75ba5f/HBM-46-e70116-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b55/12308910/b268dee6aeb0/HBM-46-e70116-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b55/12308910/b11d1854f79e/HBM-46-e70116-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b55/12308910/fcd02e75ba5f/HBM-46-e70116-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Data-Driven Approach to Dynamic Resting State Functional Connectivity in Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: An ENIGMA-PGC PTSD Study.创伤后应激障碍动态静息态功能连接的数据驱动方法:一项ENIGMA-PGC创伤后应激障碍研究
Hum Brain Mapp. 2025 Aug 1;46(11):e70116. doi: 10.1002/hbm.70116.
2
A Method for Estimating Dynamic Functional Network Connectivity Gradients (dFNGs) From ICA Captures Smooth Inter-Network Modulation.一种从独立成分分析(ICA)估计动态功能网络连通性梯度(dFNGs)的方法可捕捉到网络间的平滑调制。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2025 Jul;46(10):e70262. doi: 10.1002/hbm.70262.
3
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
4
Altered Functional Connectivity and Amyloid Deposition in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder-Associated Cognitive Impairment.创伤后应激障碍相关认知障碍中的功能连接改变与淀粉样蛋白沉积
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2025 Aug 1;46(8):1660-1669. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A8694.
5
Psychological therapies for post-traumatic stress disorder and comorbid substance use disorder.创伤后应激障碍及共病物质使用障碍的心理治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 4;4(4):CD010204. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010204.pub2.
6
Connectome-Based Predictive Modeling of PTSD Development Among Recent Trauma Survivors.基于连接组的近期创伤幸存者创伤后应激障碍发展的预测模型
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Mar 3;8(3):e250331. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0331.
7
Examining Rates of Traumatic Events and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms Among Autistic Adults.自闭症成年人创伤性事件发生率及创伤后应激障碍症状研究
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Sep 16;6(3):374-387. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0022. eCollection 2024 Sep.
8
Differential dynamic functional network connectivity in different motor subtypes of Parkinson's disease.帕金森病不同运动亚型中的差异动态功能网络连接性
Brain Res Bull. 2025 Sep;229:111460. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2025.111460. Epub 2025 Jul 9.
9
Adverse childhood experiences and post-traumatic stress impacts on brain connectivity and alcohol use in adolescence.童年不良经历和创伤后应激对青少年大脑连接性及酒精使用的影响。
Child Neuropsychol. 2025 Aug;31(6):850-870. doi: 10.1080/09297049.2025.2451799. Epub 2025 Jan 17.
10
Psychological, social and welfare interventions for psychological health and well-being of torture survivors.针对酷刑幸存者心理健康和福祉的心理、社会及福利干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 11;2014(11):CD009317. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009317.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Smaller total and subregional cerebellar volumes in posttraumatic stress disorder: a mega-analysis by the ENIGMA-PGC PTSD workgroup.创伤后应激障碍中小脑总体积和各分区域体积减小:ENIGMA-PGC PTSD 工作组的 mega 分析。
Mol Psychiatry. 2024 Mar;29(3):611-623. doi: 10.1038/s41380-023-02352-0. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
2
Why is everyone talking about brain state?为什么大家都在谈论大脑状态?
Trends Neurosci. 2023 Jul;46(7):508-524. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2023.04.001. Epub 2023 May 8.
3
Correction: Why Most Published Research Findings Are False.
勘误:为何大多数已发表的研究结果是错误的。
PLoS Med. 2022 Aug 25;19(8):e1004085. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004085. eCollection 2022 Aug.
4
ENIGMA HALFpipe: Interactive, reproducible, and efficient analysis for resting-state and task-based fMRI data.ENIGMA 半管:用于静息态和任务态 fMRI 数据的交互式、可重复和高效分析。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2022 Jun 15;43(9):2727-2742. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25829. Epub 2022 Mar 19.
5
Reproducible brain-wide association studies require thousands of individuals.可复制的全脑关联研究需要数千人参与。
Nature. 2022 Mar;603(7902):654-660. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04492-9. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
6
A symptom-based definition of resilience in times of pandemics: patterns of psychological responses over time and their predictors.基于症状的大流行时期韧性定义:随时间变化的心理反应模式及其预测因素。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2021 Feb 2;12(1):1871555. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2020.1871555. eCollection 2021.
7
What have we really learned from functional connectivity in clinical populations?我们从临床人群的功能连接中真正学到了什么?
Neuroimage. 2021 Nov 15;242:118466. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118466. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
8
The resilience paradox.复原力悖论
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2021 Jun 30;12(1):1942642. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2021.1942642. eCollection 2021.
9
The functional connectome in posttraumatic stress disorder.创伤后应激障碍中的功能连接组。
Neurobiol Stress. 2021 Mar 31;14:100321. doi: 10.1016/j.ynstr.2021.100321. eCollection 2021 May.
10
Altered large-scale functional brain organization in posttraumatic stress disorder: A comprehensive review of univariate and network-level neurocircuitry models of PTSD.创伤后应激障碍中大脑功能的大规模改变:创伤后应激障碍神经回路模型的单变量和网络水平的综合综述。
Neuroimage Clin. 2020;27:102319. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102319. Epub 2020 Jun 23.