• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用双层嵌入式框架对农村社区实施支持计划的评估。

Evaluation of an implementation support program for rural communities using a two-tiered, embedded framework.

作者信息

Shin Michelle B, Vu Thuy, Masud Manal, Duran Miriana C, Escoffery Ngoc Cam, Bishop Sonia, Winer Rachel L, Ko Linda K

机构信息

Department of Child, Family, and Population Health Nursing, School of Nursing, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.

Cancer Epidemiology Prevention Program, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, USA.

出版信息

Cancer Causes Control. 2025 Jul 30. doi: 10.1007/s10552-025-02037-9.

DOI:10.1007/s10552-025-02037-9
PMID:40739416
Abstract

PURPOSE

Evaluate the impact of Implementation Studio (the "Studio") on community-based organizations' (CBOs) EBI implementation, including changes in breast and colorectal (CRC) cancer screening status among Hispanic/Latino/a EBI recipients.

METHODS

A two-tiered, embedded framework consisted of 1) surveys (n = 38) comparing up-to-date breast and CRC screening status among EBI recipients pre/post-EBI delivery (Tier 1); and semi-structured interviews (n = 13 total; n = 7 leaders, n = 6 community health workers) with CBO staff assessing EBI implementation outcomes using rapid qualitative analysis methods (Tier 2) guided by Proctor's Implementation Research Outcomes Framework. Surveys and interviews were conducted in Spanish/English by phone/virtually September 2022-September 2023.

RESULTS

Up-to-date screening status increased by 16.6% for breast and 19.3% for CRC screening pre/post-EBI implementation, albeit not statistically significant overall (p = 0.168). CBOs reported that implementing EBIs cultivated their confidence and enhanced CBOs' workforce capacity (acceptability). CHWs (the primary EBI implementers) proficiently used the Studio tools to adapt the EBIs to improve fit and implement them in the rural Hispanic/Latino/a communities (appropriateness). Remote delivery increased the EBI accessibility for the community (feasibility). Key drivers of costs were CHWs' time to adapt and implement EBIs (costs). CBOs expressed the need to address clients' social needs to maintain EBI's impact (sustainability).

CONCLUSION

CBOs successfully implemented CHW-led EBIs, and their efforts increased up-to-date cancer screening among rural Hispanic/Latino/a community members. These findings demonstrate that Studio is a promising strategy for building CBOs' capacity to implement EBIs and increase cancer screening.

摘要

目的

评估实施工作室(“工作室”)对社区组织(CBO)实施循证干预措施(EBI)的影响,包括西班牙裔/拉丁裔EBI接受者的乳腺癌和结直肠癌(CRC)筛查状况的变化。

方法

采用两层嵌入式框架,包括:1)调查(n = 38),比较EBI实施前/后EBI接受者的最新乳腺癌和CRC筛查状况(第1层);以及与CBO工作人员进行的半结构化访谈(共n = 13;n = 7名领导者,n = 6名社区卫生工作者),使用由普罗克特的实施研究成果框架指导的快速定性分析方法评估EBI实施结果(第2层)。2022年9月至2023年9月通过电话/虚拟方式以西班牙语/英语进行调查和访谈。

结果

在EBI实施前/后,乳腺癌的最新筛查状况增加了16.6%,CRC筛查增加了19.3%,尽管总体上无统计学意义(p = 0.168)。CBO报告称,实施EBI增强了他们的信心并提高了CBO的劳动力能力(可接受性)。社区卫生工作者(主要的EBI实施者)熟练使用工作室工具来调整EBI以提高适应性并在农村西班牙裔/拉丁裔社区实施(适宜性)。远程交付增加了社区对EBI的可及性(可行性)。成本的主要驱动因素是社区卫生工作者调整和实施EBI的时间(成本)。CBO表示需要满足客户的社会需求以维持EBI的影响(可持续性)。

结论

CBO成功实施了由社区卫生工作者主导的EBI,他们的努力提高了农村西班牙裔/拉丁裔社区成员的最新癌症筛查率。这些发现表明,工作室是建设CBO实施EBI能力和增加癌症筛查的一种有前景的策略。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of an implementation support program for rural communities using a two-tiered, embedded framework.使用双层嵌入式框架对农村社区实施支持计划的评估。
Cancer Causes Control. 2025 Jul 30. doi: 10.1007/s10552-025-02037-9.
2
Implementation studio: implementation support program to build the capacity of rural community health educators serving immigrant communities to implement evidence-based cancer prevention and control interventions.实施工作室:实施支持计划,以提高服务移民社区的农村社区健康教育者实施基于证据的癌症预防和控制干预措施的能力。
Cancer Causes Control. 2023 Dec;34(Suppl 1):75-88. doi: 10.1007/s10552-023-01743-6. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
3
Preparing to implement Floreciendo with Latina teens and their female caregivers: Integrating implementation science and the multiphase optimization strategy framework.准备与拉丁裔青少年及其女性照顾者一起实施“Floreciendo”:整合实施科学与多阶段优化策略框架。
Transl Behav Med. 2025 Jan 16;15(1). doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibaf005.
4
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
5
Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of lay health worker programmes to improve access to maternal and child health: qualitative evidence synthesis.实施非专业卫生工作者项目以改善孕产妇和儿童健康服务可及性的障碍与促进因素:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 8;2013(10):CD010414. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010414.pub2.
6
Improving animated instructional videos for colorectal cancer screening: An application of learner verification and revision.改进结直肠癌筛查的动画教学视频:学习者验证与修订的应用
Transl Behav Med. 2025 Jan 16;15(1). doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibaf020.
7
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.
8
Implementation and maintenance of breast cancer screening among Chinese rural women: a mixed-methods evaluation based on RE-AIM framework.中国农村妇女乳腺癌筛查的实施与维持:基于RE-AIM框架的混合方法评估
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 18;25(1):2502. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23679-z.
9
Building a Client Resource and Communication Platform for Community-Based Organizations to Address Health and Social Needs: Co-Design Study.为社区组织构建客户端资源和交流平台以满足健康和社会需求:共同设计研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Aug 16;11:e53939. doi: 10.2196/53939.
10
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.