Hall Caitlyn, Melvold Jacqueline
College of Agriculture, Life, and Environmental Sciences and College of Engineering, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Transdisciplinary (TD) School, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2025 Jul 31;383(2302):20240283. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2024.0283.
As hydrology faces the mounting pressures of climate change, researchers grapple with translating their technical advancements into societal impact. Traditional hydrology research often isolates technical solutions, such as optimizing water flows or predicting droughts, from the broader socio-economic, ecological and policy contexts in which water issues unfold. This compartmentalization limits the effectiveness of hydrological research in addressing complex, interconnected water challenges. Transdisciplinary (TD) approaches offer a path forward, emphasizing the integration of diverse knowledge sources, the co-production of solutions with community and policy stakeholders and a reflexive stance that acknowledges researchers' positionality and assumptions. This article advocates for adopting well-established frameworks from other fields to transcend disciplinary boundaries, fostering actionable solutions that resonate with societal needs. By leveraging structured frameworks to manage technical uncertainties, synthesize knowledge and prioritize contextual relevance, hydrologists can enhance the real-world impact of their research. We propose four guiding principles for incorporating TD practice into hydrology and offer five guiding questions to support hydrologists in guiding their shift towards societal impact. We aim to build a research practice that advances scientific understanding and addresses urgent water challenges through collaborative, socially engaged and context-sensitive approaches.This article is part of the discussion meeting issue 'Hydrology in the 21st century: challenges in science, to policy and practice'.
随着水文学面临气候变化带来的日益增大的压力,研究人员努力将其技术进步转化为社会影响。传统的水文学研究常常将技术解决方案,如优化水流或预测干旱,与水问题出现的更广泛的社会经济、生态和政策背景隔离开来。这种划分限制了水文学研究应对复杂、相互关联的水挑战的有效性。跨学科方法提供了一条前进的道路,强调整合不同的知识来源、与社区和政策利益相关者共同制定解决方案,以及一种反思性的立场,承认研究人员的立场和假设。本文主张采用其他领域已确立的框架来超越学科界限,培养与社会需求产生共鸣的可行动解决方案。通过利用结构化框架来管理技术不确定性、整合知识并优先考虑与背景的相关性,水文学家可以增强其研究在现实世界中的影响。我们提出了将跨学科实践纳入水文学的四项指导原则,并提供了五个指导问题,以支持水文学家引导他们向社会影响转变。我们旨在建立一种研究实践,通过协作、社会参与和情境敏感的方法推进科学理解并应对紧迫的水挑战。本文是“21世纪的水文学:科学、政策和实践中的挑战”讨论会议题的一部分。