文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

牙科恐惧与牙科焦虑:100篇被引频次最高论文的文献计量分析

Dental fear and dental anxiety: bibliometric analysis of the 100 most frequently cited papers.

作者信息

Paiva Ana Clara F, Gallagher Jennifer E, Paiva Saul M, Bendo Cristiane B

机构信息

Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Faculdade de Odontologia, Departamento de Odontopediatria, Belo Horizonte, Brasil.

King's College London, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, Dental Public Health Department, London, United kingdom.

出版信息

Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2025 Apr;38(1):246-255. doi: 10.54589/aol.38/1/59.


DOI:10.54589/aol.38/1/59
PMID:40741808
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12317771/
Abstract

UNLABELLED: Dental fear and anxiety are feelings that are often present at dental appointments and have been studied for a long time. AIM: To identify and critically review the 100 most frequently cited papers on dental fear and dental anxiety (DFA). MATERIALS AND METHOD: The 100 most frequently cited papers on DFA were retrieved from Web of Sciences (All databases) using a combined search strategy. Key bibliometric indicators were extracted. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed by the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) except for reviews and systematic reviews, which were evaluated by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) tool. RESULTS: Citations for the 100 most frequently cited papers ranged from 81 to 882. The largest number of papers was from the United States of America (22 papers; 3850 citations). Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology was the journal with highest number of papers (27 papers; 3153 citations). The most frequently cited author was Corah NL (1390 citations). Cross-sectional study design was the most common (67 studies). The topics covered by the studies were diverse, highlighting studies on the development and validation of assessment tools. There were 17 validated assessment tools, of which The Dental Anxiety Scale was the most often used (28 studies). There were five terms used to refer to DFA. Most papers were of intermediate quality. CONCLUSION: This bibliometric analysis identified the 100 most frequently cited papers on DFA and the topics covered. "Dental anxiety" was the term most often used, although more recent research includes both "fear" and "anxiety". The Dental Anxiety scale was the most frequently used assessment tool. Higher quality papers are encouraged to improve knowledge on DFA.

摘要

未标注:牙科恐惧和焦虑是在看牙时经常出现的情绪,并且已经被研究了很长时间。 目的:识别并批判性地回顾关于牙科恐惧和牙科焦虑(DFA)被引用次数最多的100篇论文。 材料与方法:使用组合搜索策略从科学网(所有数据库)中检索关于DFA被引用次数最多的100篇论文。提取关键文献计量指标。除综述和系统评价由乔安娜·布里格斯研究所(JBI)工具评估外,研究的方法学质量由混合方法评估工具(MMAT)评估。 结果:被引用次数最多的100篇论文的引用次数从81到882不等。论文数量最多的国家是美国(22篇论文;3850次引用)。《社区牙科与口腔流行病学》是发表论文数量最多的期刊(27篇论文;3153次引用)。被引用次数最多的作者是科拉·N·L(1390次引用)。横断面研究设计最为常见(67项研究)。研究涵盖的主题多种多样,突出了评估工具的开发和验证方面的研究。有17种经过验证的评估工具,其中牙科焦虑量表使用最为频繁(28项研究)。有五个术语用于指代DFA。大多数论文质量中等。 结论:这项文献计量分析确定了关于DFA被引用次数最多的100篇论文及其涵盖的主题。“牙科焦虑”是最常用的术语,尽管最近的研究同时包括“恐惧”和“焦虑”。牙科焦虑量表是最常用的评估工具。鼓励发表更高质量的论文以增进对DFA的了解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33e0/12317771/a391a88b085f/1852-4834-38-1-59-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33e0/12317771/a391a88b085f/1852-4834-38-1-59-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33e0/12317771/a391a88b085f/1852-4834-38-1-59-g001.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Dental fear and dental anxiety: bibliometric analysis of the 100 most frequently cited papers.

Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2025-4

[2]
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.

JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016-4

[3]
Research status, hotspots and perspectives of artificial intelligence applied to pain management: a bibliometric and visual analysis.

Updates Surg. 2025-6-28

[4]
The experience of adults who choose watchful waiting or active surveillance as an approach to medical treatment: a qualitative systematic review.

JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016-2

[5]
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.

Health Technol Assess. 2001

[6]
Knowledge graph and bibliometric analysis of inflammatory indicators in ovarian cancer.

Front Oncol. 2025-6-30

[7]
Developmental Defects of Enamel: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Top 100 Most-Cited Papers.

Caries Res. 2024

[8]
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.

Med Teach. 2009-4

[9]
The quantity, quality and findings of network meta-analyses evaluating the effectiveness of GLP-1 RAs for weight loss: a scoping review.

Health Technol Assess. 2025-6-25

[10]
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.

Syst Rev. 2024-11-26

本文引用的文献

[1]
Impact of dental visiting patterns on oral health: A systematic review of longitudinal studies.

BDJ Open. 2024-3-6

[2]
Global prevalence of early childhood dental fear and anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

J Dent. 2024-3

[3]
Developmental Defects of Enamel: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Top 100 Most-Cited Papers.

Caries Res. 2024

[4]
Preliminary guideline for reporting bibliometric reviews of the biomedical literature (BIBLIO): a minimum requirements.

Syst Rev. 2023-12-15

[5]
Non-pharmacological Behavior Management Techniques in Pediatric Dentistry: A Bibliometric Analysis.

Cureus. 2023-7-3

[6]
Bibliometric Analysis for Medical Research.

Indian J Psychol Med. 2023-5

[7]
A Bibliometric Analysis on the Early Works of Dental Anxiety.

Dent J (Basel). 2023-2-1

[8]
Factors affecting interpretation of dental radiographs.

Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2023-1

[9]
Clinical and Laboratory Characteristics of Pediatric COVID-19 Population-A Bibliometric Analysis.

J Clin Med. 2022-10-11

[10]
Barriers and enablers in the implementation and sustainability of toothbrushing programs in early childhood settings and primary schools: a systematic review.

BMC Oral Health. 2022-6-18

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索