Liñares Antonio, Maceiras Lucía, Nóvoa Lourdes, González Alejandro, Rodríguez Borja, Batalla Pilar, Leira Yago, Blanco Juan
Periodontology Unit, School of Dentistry, University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2025 Oct;36(10):1335-1345. doi: 10.1111/clr.70005. Epub 2025 Jul 31.
To evaluate changes in the peri-implant marginal bone level at implants restored with narrow or standard-diameter abutments after 12 months.
MATERIAL & METHODS: Twenty-eight partially edentulous patients were randomly allocated to two groups. The test group consisted of 14 patients restored with a 2.9 mm diameter abutment (21 implants), while the control group included 14 patients restored with a 4.1 mm diameter abutment (17 implants). The primary outcome variable was the radiographic change in the peri-implant marginal bone level at 12 months, measured as the distance from the implant shoulder to the first bone-to-implant contact (fBIC). Secondary outcome variables included clinical peri-implant parameters, the papilla index, biological and mechanical complications, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and professional aesthetic assessment.
A per-protocol analysis was conducted on the 22 patients who completed all scheduled follow-up visits. At the patient level, the change in mean radiographic bone level from definitive prosthesis placement to 12 months showed a reduction in the distance from the implant shoulder to the fBIC of 0.16 ± 0.31 mm in the test group and 0.21 ± 0.34 mm in the control group, with no statistically significant differences between the groups. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups for any of the secondary outcomes.
Considering the limitations of this study, no significant differences in peri-implant marginal bone levels were found between bone-level implants restored with narrow and standard diameter abutments after 12-month follow-up. Additionally, no differences were observed in clinical variables, patient-reported outcomes, or complications.
评估使用窄直径或标准直径基台修复的种植体在12个月后种植体周围边缘骨水平的变化。
28例部分牙列缺损患者被随机分为两组。试验组由14例使用直径2.9毫米基台修复的患者(21颗种植体)组成,而对照组包括14例使用直径4.1毫米基台修复的患者(17颗种植体)。主要结局变量是12个月时种植体周围边缘骨水平的影像学变化,通过从种植体肩部到首次骨与种植体接触(fBIC)的距离来测量。次要结局变量包括临床种植体周围参数、乳头指数、生物和机械并发症、患者报告结局(PROs)以及专业美学评估。
对完成所有预定随访的22例患者进行了符合方案分析。在患者层面,从最终修复体放置到12个月时,试验组种植体肩部到fBIC的平均影像学骨水平变化显示距离减少了0.16±0.31毫米,对照组为0.21±0.34毫米,两组之间无统计学显著差异。两组在任何次要结局方面均未观察到统计学显著差异。
考虑到本研究的局限性,在12个月的随访后,使用窄直径和标准直径基台修复的骨水平种植体在种植体周围边缘骨水平上未发现显著差异。此外,在临床变量、患者报告结局或并发症方面也未观察到差异。