Suppr超能文献

血管移植物和腔内移植物感染:关于术语、定义、治疗、结果、随访及报告标准的德尔菲共识文件

Vascular Graft and Endograft Infections: A Delphi Consensus Document on Terminology, Definitions, Treatment, Outcomes, Follow Up, and Reporting Standards.

作者信息

Sörelius Karl, Verhoek Robin, Berard Xavier, Lyons Oliver T A, Puges Mathilde, Wyss Thomas R

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Department of Vascular Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Department of Interventional Radiology and Vascular Surgery, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland.

出版信息

Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2025 Jul 29. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2025.07.044.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

There is a lack of consensus on certain terminology and definitions related to vascular graft and endograft infections (VGEIs) and secondary aorto-enteric erosion/fistula and their treatment, outcome reporting, follow up, and reporting standards. The objective of this study was to complete a Delphi consensus study on these VGEI related issues.

METHODS

The Delphi methodology was used with a panel of 43 international experts (specialists in vascular or cardiovascular surgery, infectious diseases, nuclear medicine, and radiology). Four Delphi rounds were planned using an online questionnaire initially with 31 statements. Panellists rated the statements on a five point Likert scale. Comments on statements were analysed, statements were revised, added, or deleted, and the results were presented in iterative rounds. Consensus was defined as ≥ 75% of the panel rating a statement as strongly agree or agree on the Likert scale, and consensus on the final assessment was defined as Cronbach's α > 0.80. Reporting was performed according to the ACcurate COnsensus Reporting Document (ACCORD) guideline.

RESULTS

All 43 panellists fulfilled all four rounds, resulting in 100% participation. Cronbach's α increased through the rounds: round 1, 0.88; round 2, 0.89; round 3, 0.90; and round 4, 0.90. A final fifth round was performed among all surgeons (n = 27) defining secondary aorto-enteric erosion/fistula, with 100% participation. Agreement was reached for 29 final statements: two on need for consensus, two on definition of multidisciplinary team, three on microbiology diagnosis, six on treatment, three on secondary graft-enteric partial erosion/secondary graft-enteric fistula/secondary aorto-enteric fistula, three on treatment outcomes, nine on follow up, and one on reporting standards including 11 items.

CONCLUSION

Consensus was achieved for 29 statements, which were developed to establish a common perception of VGEI and secondary aorto-enteric erosion/fistula, with the potential to improve research in this field and ultimately patient care.

摘要

目的

在与血管移植物和腔内移植物感染(VGEIs)以及继发性主动脉肠侵蚀/瘘管相关的某些术语、定义及其治疗、结果报告、随访和报告标准方面,目前尚未达成共识。本研究的目的是就这些与VGEI相关的问题完成一项德尔菲共识研究。

方法

采用德尔菲法,邀请了43位国际专家(血管或心血管外科、传染病、核医学和放射学领域的专家)组成专家小组。计划进行四轮德尔菲调查,最初使用在线问卷,包含31条陈述。小组成员根据五点李克特量表对陈述进行评分。对陈述的评论进行分析,对陈述进行修订、添加或删除,并在迭代轮次中呈现结果。共识定义为≥75%的专家小组在李克特量表上对某一陈述评为强烈同意或同意,最终评估的共识定义为克朗巴哈系数α>0.80。报告按照《准确共识报告文件》(ACCORD)指南进行。

结果

所有43位专家小组成员都完成了四轮调查,参与率达100%。克朗巴哈系数α在各轮中逐渐增加:第一轮为0.88;第二轮为0.89;第三轮为0.90;第四轮为​0.90。在所有外科医生(n = 27)中进行了最后一轮第五轮调查,以定义继发性主动脉肠侵蚀/瘘管,参与率达100%。就29条最终陈述达成了一致意见:两条关于达成共识的必要性,两条关于多学科团队的定义,三条关于微生物学诊断,六条关于治疗,三条关于继发性移植物肠部分侵蚀/继发性移植物肠瘘/继发性主动脉肠瘘,三条关于治疗结果,九条关于随访,一条关于报告标准,包括11项内容。

结论

就29条陈述达成了共识,这些陈述旨在建立对VGEI和继发性主动脉肠侵蚀/瘘管的共同认识,有可能改善该领域的研究并最终改善患者护理。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验